A comparison of Australian and UK obstetricians' and midwives' preferences for screening tests for Down syndrome.
about
Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).Preferences for Prenatal Tests for Cystic Fibrosis: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Compare the Views of Adult Patients, Carriers of Cystic Fibrosis and Health ProfessionalsKnowledge and future preference of Chinese women in a major public hospital in Hong Kong after undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for positive aneuploidy screening: a questionnaire surveyUnderstanding patient preferences and willingness to pay for hemophilia therapies.Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals.A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England.Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature.Women and their partners' preferences for Down's syndrome screening tests: a discrete choice experiment.Preferences for prenatal diagnosis of sickle-cell disorder: A discrete choice experiment comparing potential service users and health-care providers.Women's and healthcare professionals' preferences for prenatal testing: a discrete choice experiment.Women’s and health professionals’ preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive testsDETERMINATION OF INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCE: WHY, HOW AND ALTERNATIVES
P2860
Q30557139-9484CE4C-AAA5-4302-8C9F-53C0D8E092F4Q35667173-A4C59C19-8477-4E16-AC65-CF4D89272BDEQ35761823-2A52F8F1-A5A8-4D68-BB90-5A68E06DADA8Q36284406-A42CD030-F223-4D0F-8F0B-CBE43E8E1F6EQ37351480-6C4292FF-DFCD-4254-AF15-E695ADF38E03Q37737743-6019D2A4-D519-4CE6-AC34-32656A620C58Q38103514-93CD6BE5-FF38-4462-AD84-C01A302F46AAQ45752972-7BBCAA7C-67EA-42FB-8F5B-13AB4D076878Q47152948-F0EF8EF5-1058-4463-84CC-6225CE75213FQ53621688-D5658656-19DF-429F-A390-805ACBBC11CFQ57839583-90AB6CF6-7DAF-4F65-949B-70171B8E35CBQ58029223-D22DD422-3A7E-492B-A4FD-5A19880DC59D
P2860
A comparison of Australian and UK obstetricians' and midwives' preferences for screening tests for Down syndrome.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年学术文章
@wuu
2006年学术文章
@zh
2006年学术文章
@zh-cn
2006年学术文章
@zh-hans
2006年学术文章
@zh-my
2006年学术文章
@zh-sg
2006年學術文章
@yue
2006年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparison of Australian and ...... ening tests for Down syndrome.
@en
A comparison of Australian and ...... ening tests for Down syndrome.
@nl
type
label
A comparison of Australian and ...... ening tests for Down syndrome.
@en
A comparison of Australian and ...... ening tests for Down syndrome.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of Australian and ...... ening tests for Down syndrome.
@en
A comparison of Australian and ...... ening tests for Down syndrome.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
A comparison of Australian and ...... ening tests for Down syndrome.
@en
P2093
Amanda J Bishop
Fiona N Cullinane
Jane L Halliday
Sharon M Lewis
P2860
P356
10.1002/PD.1357
P577
2006-01-01T00:00:00Z