Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

about

Relative judgement is relatively difficult: Evidence against the role of relative judgement in absolute identification.Relative judgment and knowledge of the category structure.

P2860

Q38590484-E7CF5068-3158-4C7C-A70D-85F70686730A Q46068128-07849D39-316E-487B-B6F8-446EBA58317E

P2860

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q51869066

description

2009 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2009年の論文

@ja

2009年学术文章

@wuu

2009年学术文章

@zh

2009年学术文章

@zh-cn

2009年学术文章

@zh-hans

2009年学术文章

@zh-my

2009年学术文章

@zh-sg

2009年學術文章

@yue

2009年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

@en

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

@nl

type

Item

label

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

@en

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

@nl

prefLabel

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

@en

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

@nl

P1476

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

@en

P2093

A A J Marley

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification.

Dissociating speed and accuracy in absolute identification: the effect of unequal stimulus spacing.

Relative judgment and knowledge of the category structure.

Is absolute identification always relative? Comment on Stewart, Brown, and Chater (2005).

The dynamics of scaling: a memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification.

From universal laws of cognition to specific cognitive models.

Choice and response time processes in the identification and categorization of unidimensional stimuli.

Bow, range, and sequential effects in absolute identification: a response-time analysis.

A Mapping Model of Bow Effects in Absolute Identification

A revision of the response ratio hypothesis for magnitude estimation

P2888

pbr.16.3.583

P304

583-593

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.3758/PBR.16.3.583

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Andrew Heathcote

Scott D. Brown

Pennie Dodds

P577

2009-06-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

24436207

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1017386922

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

19451389

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

about

P2860

P2860

Purely relative models cannot provide a general account of absolute identification.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P6179

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P6179

P698