The feasibility of using Pareto fronts for comparison of treatment planning systems and delivery techniques.
about
Initial evaluation of automated treatment planning softwareFeasibility of constant dose rate VMAT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.Employing the therapeutic operating characteristic (TOC) graph for individualised dose prescription.Toward optimal organ at risk sparing in complex volumetric modulated arc therapy: an exponential trade-off with target volume dose homogeneity.Evaluation of the optimal combinations of modulation factor and pitch for Helical TomoTherapy plans made with TomoEdge using Pareto optimal fronts.Feasibility of identification of gamma knife planning strategies by identification of pareto optimal gamma knife plans.Development of a neuro-fuzzy technique for automated parameter optimization of inverse treatment planning.Comparative analysis of Pareto surfaces in multi-criteria IMRT planningBayesian procedures for phase I/II clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of drug combinations.Treatment plan comparison using grading analysis based on clinical judgment.Introducing multiple treatment plan-based comparison to investigate the performance of gantry angle optimisation (GAO) in IMRT for head and neck cancer.Photon and proton therapy planning comparison for malignant glioma based on CT, FDG-PET, DTI-MRI and fiber tracking.Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.Multi-modality optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning using composite objective values.Clinical evaluation of 3D/3D MRI-CBCT automatching on brain tumors for online patient setup verification - A step towards MRI-based treatment planning.
P2860
Q28275470-5921EEAB-A54F-4A59-B3BB-6F8910E8E2F5Q34463329-08299943-7C08-449C-9309-68217F83B537Q39226561-2248EB5E-45CD-4342-B49F-0C1328826C6BQ39254486-3E7AA31E-7682-4F02-BC5F-A80915184C5EQ40531999-D2C70882-7B50-49F7-B552-D23D4A84575CQ41878291-C13F08FA-0861-4B31-9187-91B99D213721Q42001401-115CCED4-FF70-49BF-AD1F-2990C9D0E895Q42805848-9D788EA3-12CD-4FFF-B0C0-BF00B5EC1EEBQ44002670-2BACFA99-FCCD-4591-A461-3B14FC9BA0F3Q44223510-EDFE1C75-129D-451D-8BC5-A31149B169CCQ47858371-539D5515-403C-410A-98BE-49C6FCFCE176Q49037053-F6F2C6CA-2203-4950-A180-8B8CC957DC55Q51040267-93CAC9A0-521B-44E1-9D78-446B9FD825E9Q51045233-4835E046-A64A-47C6-8065-86DEE8DB19CAQ55463865-1DDE3875-BEEF-437F-9928-1C3C880A1954
P2860
The feasibility of using Pareto fronts for comparison of treatment planning systems and delivery techniques.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The feasibility of using Paret ...... stems and delivery techniques.
@en
The feasibility of using Paret ...... stems and delivery techniques.
@nl
type
label
The feasibility of using Paret ...... stems and delivery techniques.
@en
The feasibility of using Paret ...... stems and delivery techniques.
@nl
prefLabel
The feasibility of using Paret ...... stems and delivery techniques.
@en
The feasibility of using Paret ...... stems and delivery techniques.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
The feasibility of using Paret ...... stems and delivery techniques.
@en
P2093
Anna Karlsson
Claus F Behrens
Crister Ceberg
David Sjöström
Per E Engstrom
Rickard O Ottosson
Tommy Knöös
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/02841860802251559
P577
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z