Quality improvement, pay for performance, and "outcomes measurement": what makes sense?
about
Quality improvement, pay for performance, and "outcomes measurement": what makes sense?
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Quality improvement, pay for performance, and "outcomes measurement": what makes sense?
@en
Quality improvement, pay for performance, and "outcomes measurement": what makes sense?
@nl
type
label
Quality improvement, pay for performance, and "outcomes measurement": what makes sense?
@en
Quality improvement, pay for performance, and "outcomes measurement": what makes sense?
@nl
prefLabel
Quality improvement, pay for performance, and "outcomes measurement": what makes sense?
@en
Quality improvement, pay for performance, and "outcomes measurement": what makes sense?
@nl
P356
P1433
P1476
Quality improvement, pay for performance, and "outcomes measurement": what makes sense?
@en
P2093
Benjamin Liptzin
P304
P356
10.1176/PS.2009.60.1.108
P577
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z