Are "physiological" and "psychological" addiction really different? well, no! ... um, er, yes?
about
Are "physiological" and "psychological" addiction really different? well, no! ... um, er, yes?
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年学术文章
@wuu
2008年学术文章
@zh
2008年学术文章
@zh-cn
2008年学术文章
@zh-hans
2008年学术文章
@zh-my
2008年学术文章
@zh-sg
2008年學術文章
@yue
2008年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Are "physiological" and "psych ...... nt? well, no! ... um, er, yes?
@en
Are "physiological" and "psych ...... nt? well, no! ... um, er, yes?
@nl
type
label
Are "physiological" and "psych ...... nt? well, no! ... um, er, yes?
@en
Are "physiological" and "psych ...... nt? well, no! ... um, er, yes?
@nl
prefLabel
Are "physiological" and "psych ...... nt? well, no! ... um, er, yes?
@en
Are "physiological" and "psych ...... nt? well, no! ... um, er, yes?
@nl
P2860
P1476
Are "physiological" and "psych ...... nt? well, no! ... um, er, yes?
@en
P2093
David B Newlin
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/10826080802097389
P577
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z