Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.
about
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision makingCommunicating uncertainty can lead to less decision satisfaction: a necessary cost of involving patients in shared decision making?Assessing patient preferences for treatment options and process of care in inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review of quantitative dataSharing behavioral data through a grid infrastructure using data standardsWhat is my cancer risk? How internet-based cancer risk assessment tools communicate individualized risk estimates to the public: content analysisPresenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.Effectiveness of the head CT choice decision aid in parents of children with minor head trauma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.Interventions to Improve Care for Patients with Limited Health Literacy.Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimatesParents' preferences for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.Effects of game-like interactive graphics on risk perceptions and decisions.The role of numeracy in informed consent for surveys.Health numeracy: the importance of domain in assessing numeracy.A new adaptive testing algorithm for shortening health literacy assessmentsThe effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics.Numeracy and literacy independently predict patients' ability to identify out-of-range test resultsEffect of various risk/benefit trade-offs on parents' understanding of a pediatric research study.The numeracy understanding in medicine instrument: a measure of health numeracy developed using item response theory.Improving urban African Americans' blood pressure control through multi-level interventions in the Achieving Blood Pressure Control Together (ACT) study: a randomized clinical trial.Text messaging as a community-based survey tool: a pilot study.The impact of physicians' reactions to uncertainty on patients' decision satisfaction.Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%Conceptual problems in laypersons' understanding of individualized cancer risk: a qualitative study.Belief in numbers: When and why women disbelieve tailored breast cancer risk statisticsMeasuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.Health literacy, numeracy, and other characteristics associated with hospitalized patients' preferences for involvement in decision making.Improving the process of informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention: patient outcomes from the Patient Risk Information Services Manager (ePRISM) study.Bridging the digital divide in diabetes: family support and implications for health literacyConcerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.Cool but counterproductive: interactive, Web-based risk communications can backfire.Patient decision making about organ quality in liver transplantation.Factors affecting recall of different types of personal genetic information about Alzheimer's disease risk: the REVEAL study.Presenting research risks and benefits to parents: does format matter?Valuation of health states in the US study to establish disability weights: lessons from the literature.Measuring pain impact versus pain severity using a numeric rating scale.The impact of numeracy on verbatim knowledge of the longitudinal risk for prostate cancer recurrence following radiation therapy.Different Measures, Different Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Performance-Based versus Self-Reported Measures of Health Literacy and Numeracy.Testing Map Features Designed to Convey the Uncertainty of Cancer Risk: Insights Gained From Assessing Judgments of Information Adequacy and Communication Goals.Validation of a Short, 3-Item Version of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale.
P2860
Q24615211-36D60421-58CB-429C-BCA9-3B35EEA6DF07Q24620682-33EF0B2A-C925-4A2E-93C6-A4471F70F7D7Q26864906-3FEB9EE3-E4A4-4267-B9D4-AB2617317E20Q28656438-D1D2DD2E-B68B-400D-93E4-6CF625C2ADFCQ28750489-A0B8F517-E0BD-4A68-9E3F-F584D63FD76FQ30579901-EFB933AD-6740-41B9-9481-D994FD2958B8Q30582682-DBA2E3A7-3331-457C-942B-1838DE6359E0Q33561085-3CC0C109-1EE7-464A-82A6-23729872926AQ33699684-507003B6-CE6C-4CE3-8659-3551BDF1CBB1Q33719736-E9B0425C-A04E-4AEE-8F83-EF52EC850091Q33797571-EB1FCC43-52D7-4681-B7E0-C37DCB6205CAQ33802727-46C3D2A0-C5C1-4D15-89B3-2D3E46C9BBFDQ33930088-1DD736A9-5B70-4E68-85BB-593C9D8A833EQ33984041-2245FEAB-AC0B-4433-AF4C-7B44B85211C2Q34042087-7DE0EFF5-F9E2-4389-94DD-3A1591B3B986Q34063028-6B909B5C-D28D-4788-A095-625935034CB2Q34159633-BC97653B-7227-4B98-972F-32AFD39C2437Q34172683-D656CFE8-D4B7-4AF3-B206-DABF5A426E40Q34212932-B57B0760-68DC-49F9-A828-22C3F6D2C54EQ34217370-F965B355-6E86-4A65-856F-4F9D34B598F7Q34299979-BE6E400C-4211-48AA-AA1C-E3EA5DD1D133Q34361319-272348C9-7C01-43E9-A3F8-F51FA0B1FA0DQ34378266-F1CFEDF1-07C9-48A6-A098-BAA2EC6E6C63Q34398521-A3683505-DD05-4CB1-9141-18F3C15FD3B3Q34653859-1EC35C10-3719-4826-8664-16045D7330A7Q35012575-B156850A-FE40-474D-A6A5-D08C2BB5C7D2Q35043656-59F3C7CB-61D5-45C9-BC6F-DF85F4321C01Q35239489-F942D2EF-B350-42A9-B459-9C58F3E63C18Q35563836-49E81E92-3D20-4AB0-BE78-DFC4CF7138F4Q35567637-62D08092-3909-4708-A3BE-E9888BAD0460Q35583322-E96010B0-FE32-4989-9FB2-8EDB6E40E3CAQ35751095-ECFC24E6-F1C5-42BB-9B42-170A2263F789Q35800763-DBE0539B-D010-4E79-8701-1590111B7968Q35835421-DBC7D22C-EDA1-4111-84AB-885E08E12538Q35888203-E51703B9-014F-400E-B1AE-3BCE44E760ABQ36052438-A31CE369-E808-4FEE-9248-5B2F44B9B774Q36083920-DFDA9C76-5FA4-4D30-80C1-A8A8F502BECEQ36087888-2CBA716D-718E-4992-96A7-7F3F850D698FQ36117582-1EF6AA87-BF26-4F19-A00B-F13BF36BB531Q36132098-A0C96C39-1B25-4D00-858B-E0BCA7930072
P2860
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Validation of the Subjective N ...... ions and utility elicitations.
@en
Validation of the Subjective N ...... ions and utility elicitations.
@nl
type
label
Validation of the Subjective N ...... ions and utility elicitations.
@en
Validation of the Subjective N ...... ions and utility elicitations.
@nl
prefLabel
Validation of the Subjective N ...... ions and utility elicitations.
@en
Validation of the Subjective N ...... ions and utility elicitations.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Validation of the Subjective N ...... ions and utility elicitations.
@en
P2093
Dylan M Smith
Peter A Ubel
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/0272989X07303824
P577
2007-07-24T00:00:00Z