Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
about
An empirical investigation into the role of subjective prior probability in searching for potentially missing itemsObject-based auditory facilitation of visual search for pictures and words with frequent and rare targetsVarying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual searchDo prevalence expectations affect patterns of visual search and decision-making in interpreting CT colonography endoluminal videos?The ultra-rare-item effect: visual search for exceedingly rare items is highly susceptible to error.Prevalence of abnormal cases in an image bank affects the learning of radiograph interpretation.Assessing the effect of a true-positive recall case in screening mammography: does perceptual priming alter radiologists' performance?Assessing the feasibility of the American College of Surgeons' benchmarks for the triage of trauma patients.On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness.Visual search for rare targets: distracter tuning as a mechanism for learning from repeated target-absent searches.Triage patterns for medicare patients presenting to nontrauma hospitals with moderate or severe injuries.Infrequent identity mismatches are frequently undetected.Probability cueing influences miss rate and decision criterion in visual searches.Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search.Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effectIf you don't find it often, you often don't find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screeningRetrospective review of the drop in observer detection performance over time in lesion-enriched experimental studies.Searching for flavor labels in food products: the influence of color-flavor congruence and association strength.Adaptation and visual search in mammographic images.Comparing Breast Screening Protocols: Inserting Catch Trials Does Not Improve Sensitivity over Double ScreeningSources of non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines in trauma triage: a decision science studyHybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of targetUnbiased review of digital diagnostic images in practice: informatics prototype and pilot studyVisual search of experts in medical image reading: the effect of training, target prevalence, and expert knowledgeHOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE?Short-term memory for pictures seen once or twice.Can laptops be left inside passenger bags if motion imaging is used in X-ray security screening?Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missedA 'snapshot' of the visual search behaviours of medical sonographersExperimental system for measurement of radiologists' performance by visual search task.Pirate stealth or inattentional blindness? The effects of target relevance and sustained attention on security monitoring for experienced and naïve operators.Prevalence of abnormalities influences cytologists' error rates in screening for cervical cancer.The effects of local prevalence and explicit expectations on search termination times.Visual search.Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.Getting satisfied with "satisfaction of search": How to measure errors during multiple-target visual search.Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.Analog Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) information can be more effective than binary marks.When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.
P2860
Q28607981-17DE217C-E6EE-4229-86BC-A855B1F1E9FAQ30466903-DA65E5C6-3A95-438F-81AC-4D6FA91BF25FQ30493046-19E8CB33-006D-4BAC-B7A5-DB4AE7517C24Q30747692-DDCB476D-830C-462F-8776-04AE64EF4BD6Q33440284-558CE91B-D2C7-4E2E-BFAC-8804B2228838Q33454453-857EB1F3-4176-4F68-A56C-A5AA6FDC4D59Q33823296-49A38A30-8E29-4E40-AD24-A0089FF92387Q33878145-20820C82-D341-4B59-AE88-1D32277D1C35Q33887255-B1E3DABD-6C7B-4C54-AE52-A9050723D5DDQ33959760-D7917958-C1FD-4726-9802-4E03D52936C5Q34250560-A5B58505-456D-4E24-9AEF-F00909E7A072Q34561075-3AAB92C1-597F-44F8-9782-067787A9A9E0Q34600247-DD892C77-3395-4445-A95A-F4BD9FC25008Q34721725-B1625B86-BCC4-4248-A3C4-08C4D584ED34Q34754680-BB5994C7-7A36-487F-90F6-39FE2686B676Q34758748-24624CDD-D7C2-4C57-A765-7DDE73277E39Q35008133-302A5537-C4C2-46B1-9C12-79789912F617Q35222551-498592C7-F698-4A5C-B1BE-293CEEA4786AQ35561807-56CB5634-998F-44E8-A182-99A7B619144DQ36159315-5EA5FEFC-ECF9-40C1-B862-594111A0EC42Q36416385-1FCEEDC6-04CA-47E4-8F05-F8ADB166EB2EQ36583527-132D95EB-81AA-4084-985A-3EEDFC9E0893Q36632117-F128727B-61E0-4E51-A948-84A82565FB65Q36742794-96140C76-4532-4B94-8B1E-93D704C2F461Q37015990-BEB39A89-AB28-465C-BED4-B84994ADA014Q37214562-92468A45-C553-46A8-A34E-22BC4C113B67Q37235633-E899AEA7-337D-4A04-90A3-A385E08C608CQ37239620-DEC0D680-03F6-45F0-AC76-FC7B5D3A4F6FQ37259364-80FAC127-922A-438D-9380-824962E0385DQ37337445-5FEEBDC6-D0FD-45AA-BDBF-3E0B0105F507Q37500221-17152E7C-9B65-4BA8-97FF-6D50D205F1F0Q37663828-9BDB9ECC-2683-4EA4-B38A-BAB0E2DEC853Q37671034-A3EB0EFE-C79F-4672-A239-C59913ABA237Q38573192-2F159B82-FBDC-4480-AC15-EA8032291B8EQ38614482-FB77694C-7B5A-4CA2-83BA-2E9111C85143Q38655119-CB589EC8-FDF0-4F3C-A81D-C28547E70A57Q38738238-15D30481-7943-4E79-9A80-A37C53198E4FQ39087791-D2BF7E00-F981-4C1D-BA2C-3DF8BB9921EBQ39121165-4A606F39-28B0-42E8-95D5-CF95F3578721Q39756227-1415C812-5992-40F2-9112-FE5B042D86FB
P2860
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
@en
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
@nl
type
label
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
@en
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
@nl
prefLabel
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
@en
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
@en
P2093
Michael J Van Wert
Naomi M Kenner
Nour Kibbi
Skyler S Place
Todd S Horowitz
P2860
P304
P356
10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.623
P577
2007-11-01T00:00:00Z