Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q51969854

about

An empirical investigation into the role of subjective prior probability in searching for potentially missing items Object-based auditory facilitation of visual search for pictures and words with frequent and rare targets Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search Do prevalence expectations affect patterns of visual search and decision-making in interpreting CT colonography endoluminal videos?The ultra-rare-item effect: visual search for exceedingly rare items is highly susceptible to error.Prevalence of abnormal cases in an image bank affects the learning of radiograph interpretation.Assessing the effect of a true-positive recall case in screening mammography: does perceptual priming alter radiologists' performance?Assessing the feasibility of the American College of Surgeons' benchmarks for the triage of trauma patients.On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness.Visual search for rare targets: distracter tuning as a mechanism for learning from repeated target-absent searches.Triage patterns for medicare patients presenting to nontrauma hospitals with moderate or severe injuries.Infrequent identity mismatches are frequently undetected.Probability cueing influences miss rate and decision criterion in visual searches.Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search.Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect If you don't find it often, you often don't find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening Retrospective review of the drop in observer detection performance over time in lesion-enriched experimental studies.Searching for flavor labels in food products: the influence of color-flavor congruence and association strength.Adaptation and visual search in mammographic images.Comparing Breast Screening Protocols: Inserting Catch Trials Does Not Improve Sensitivity over Double Screening Sources of non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines in trauma triage: a decision science study Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target Unbiased review of digital diagnostic images in practice: informatics prototype and pilot study Visual search of experts in medical image reading: the effect of training, target prevalence, and expert knowledge HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE?Short-term memory for pictures seen once or twice.Can laptops be left inside passenger bags if motion imaging is used in X-ray security screening?Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed A 'snapshot' of the visual search behaviours of medical sonographers Experimental system for measurement of radiologists' performance by visual search task.Pirate stealth or inattentional blindness? The effects of target relevance and sustained attention on security monitoring for experienced and naïve operators.Prevalence of abnormalities influences cytologists' error rates in screening for cervical cancer.The effects of local prevalence and explicit expectations on search termination times.Visual search.Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.Getting satisfied with "satisfaction of search": How to measure errors during multiple-target visual search.Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.Analog Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) information can be more effective than binary marks.When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.

P2860

Q28607981-17DE217C-E6EE-4229-86BC-A855B1F1E9FA Q30466903-DA65E5C6-3A95-438F-81AC-4D6FA91BF25F Q30493046-19E8CB33-006D-4BAC-B7A5-DB4AE7517C24 Q30747692-DDCB476D-830C-462F-8776-04AE64EF4BD6 Q33440284-558CE91B-D2C7-4E2E-BFAC-8804B2228838 Q33454453-857EB1F3-4176-4F68-A56C-A5AA6FDC4D59 Q33823296-49A38A30-8E29-4E40-AD24-A0089FF92387 Q33878145-20820C82-D341-4B59-AE88-1D32277D1C35 Q33887255-B1E3DABD-6C7B-4C54-AE52-A9050723D5DD Q33959760-D7917958-C1FD-4726-9802-4E03D52936C5 Q34250560-A5B58505-456D-4E24-9AEF-F00909E7A072 Q34561075-3AAB92C1-597F-44F8-9782-067787A9A9E0 Q34600247-DD892C77-3395-4445-A95A-F4BD9FC25008 Q34721725-B1625B86-BCC4-4248-A3C4-08C4D584ED34 Q34754680-BB5994C7-7A36-487F-90F6-39FE2686B676 Q34758748-24624CDD-D7C2-4C57-A765-7DDE73277E39 Q35008133-302A5537-C4C2-46B1-9C12-79789912F617 Q35222551-498592C7-F698-4A5C-B1BE-293CEEA4786A Q35561807-56CB5634-998F-44E8-A182-99A7B619144D Q36159315-5EA5FEFC-ECF9-40C1-B862-594111A0EC42 Q36416385-1FCEEDC6-04CA-47E4-8F05-F8ADB166EB2E Q36583527-132D95EB-81AA-4084-985A-3EEDFC9E0893 Q36632117-F128727B-61E0-4E51-A948-84A82565FB65 Q36742794-96140C76-4532-4B94-8B1E-93D704C2F461 Q37015990-BEB39A89-AB28-465C-BED4-B84994ADA014 Q37214562-92468A45-C553-46A8-A34E-22BC4C113B67 Q37235633-E899AEA7-337D-4A04-90A3-A385E08C608C Q37239620-DEC0D680-03F6-45F0-AC76-FC7B5D3A4F6F Q37259364-80FAC127-922A-438D-9380-824962E0385D Q37337445-5FEEBDC6-D0FD-45AA-BDBF-3E0B0105F507 Q37500221-17152E7C-9B65-4BA8-97FF-6D50D205F1F0 Q37663828-9BDB9ECC-2683-4EA4-B38A-BAB0E2DEC853 Q37671034-A3EB0EFE-C79F-4672-A239-C59913ABA237 Q38573192-2F159B82-FBDC-4480-AC15-EA8032291B8E Q38614482-FB77694C-7B5A-4CA2-83BA-2E9111C85143 Q38655119-CB589EC8-FDF0-4F3C-A81D-C28547E70A57 Q38738238-15D30481-7943-4E79-9A80-A37C53198E4F Q39087791-D2BF7E00-F981-4C1D-BA2C-3DF8BB9921EB Q39121165-4A606F39-28B0-42E8-95D5-CF95F3578721 Q39756227-1415C812-5992-40F2-9112-FE5B042D86FB

P2860

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q51969854

description

2007 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2007年の論文

@ja

2007年学术文章

@wuu

2007年学术文章

@zh

2007年学术文章

@zh-cn

2007年学术文章

@zh-hans

2007年学术文章

@zh-my

2007年学术文章

@zh-sg

2007年學術文章

@yue

2007年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

@en

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

@nl

type

label

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

@en

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

@nl

prefLabel

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

@en

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

@nl

P1433

Q51969854-D3E0889C-17AB-42F3-8447-DDB9F95F1858

P1476

Q51969854-78ED2CA6-5511-4696-8CFB-C7BACFD60A0B

P2093

Q51969854-1736C44F-6AD7-48A8-9CDF-71BFC66A562E

Q51969854-32ECCA89-DD19-492C-9739-A7E310D2DC63

Q51969854-A5C6E816-FB4B-4D30-9CE7-DC3CBC1CDB48

Q51969854-D96589CD-E6DB-4B7A-AC87-702B2ED00789

Q51969854-E7F8BEB5-36B3-4677-8537-6F23A9236048

P2860

Q51969854-053A1371-9D47-4557-A452-2509BEE8AAE9

Q51969854-080FA5EF-5938-4C34-AC85-DFA3509E216F

Q51969854-22111003-91CE-4C2F-B873-70DFB0CD577F

Q51969854-2672D1E6-8E90-4BB4-B61C-D2D50A0F1BB6

Q51969854-4729C0FE-39C4-40A8-BCCD-8E281672629F

Q51969854-4922A61E-B57C-41CC-86E1-091A20DB3AC9

Q51969854-4F34E648-9EB9-42BE-AD5A-272BEC949C92

Q51969854-592C1DAE-4A6C-4E86-8EA5-5E0C256BA01D

Q51969854-5BF3FA28-7DBC-471C-AD8D-9BFD56DC792D

Q51969854-6B67C020-9A36-4A26-8460-A07F1FA170A7

P304

Q51969854-C96B5E01-92E0-40EC-B9AB-F4120AC8B54B

P31

Q51969854-A27EC123-854A-4AC5-961A-E0676C025102

P356

Q51969854-D6D062DE-DA0F-4B9B-AAD7-142B7FDF272C

P433

Q51969854-85214661-1CEE-4723-8C00-5FFC25A5DF78

P478

Q51969854-9F987EB8-E405-448D-8ACD-033DE64D358B

P50

Q51969854-511A9B31-1A4A-49B0-AEAB-6DF046091639

P577

Q51969854-499A4881-99D2-4A45-9BD6-9EBAB5A04391

P5875

Q51969854-F53457CF-3B3B-4849-B9F1-8A9B7B084FEA

P698

Q51969854-B53FE0E6-260D-437A-BFF5-A41CF349F241

P932

Q51969854-11CE4723-0DC3-4059-8B97-3DBBF67A8F45

P356

0096-3445.136.4.623

P1433

Journal of Experimental Psychology

P1476

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

@en

P2093

Michael J Van Wert

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Naomi M Kenner

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nour Kibbi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Skyler S Place

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Todd S Horowitz

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Toward a unified theory of decision criterion learning in perceptual categorization.

Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment.

Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey.

Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Context bias. A problem in diagnostic radiology.

Small cell and 'pale' dyskaryosis.

Cognitive psychology: rare items often missed in visual searches.

Satisfaction of search (SOS)

Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.

P304

623-638

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.623

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

136

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Jeremy M. Wolfe

P577

2007-11-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

5846536

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

17999575

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

2662480

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string