Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection.
about
Novel wireless devices for cardiac monitoringManagement of atrial fibrillationBenefits of monitoring patients with mobile cardiac telemetry (MCT) compared with the Event or Holter monitors.Screening for atrial fibrillation with baseline and intermittent ECG recording in an out-of-hospital populationThe diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring.Ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring.Syncope: review of monitoring modalitiesEfficacy of diagnostic tools for detecting cardiac arrhythmias: systematic literature searchCardiac monitoring in patients with syncope: making that elusive diagnosis.Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoringIncidence and timing of potentially high-risk arrhythmias detected through long term continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring.Recurrence of atrial fibrillation within three months after pulmonary vein isolation for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Analysis using external loop recorder with auto-trigger function.Minimally invasive approach to the child with palpitations.Cryptogenic Stroke And Role Of Loop Recorder.Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring.Diagnosing atrial fibrillation in general practice.Quality of ECG monitoring with a miniature ECG recorder.2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry.Ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring devices for evaluating transient loss of consciousness or other related symptoms.Diagnostic yield of asymptomatic arrhythmias detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry and autotrigger looping event cardiac monitors.Atrial electromechanical interval can identify patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and is associated with CHADS2 score and peak velocity of left atrial appendage.
P2860
Q26828642-E64CC360-107B-4C39-A5C8-86AB4CA76367Q28217428-E1073517-8313-4413-82C9-60B5A17CC88AQ30445652-CFF52B15-0EA7-4CFA-9BFC-B2A10F571506Q31119285-BAEA53D1-FBE8-4886-B1D8-45F3B507B00DQ33154837-7278BDC9-E66E-4C96-8B9B-9F58555CB49BQ33154997-F07083A6-35AD-41A3-9FDC-9CEBB2046AADQ33158070-C6BD4757-D339-4DBB-A231-E3788AC5F667Q33159499-350A20B2-8208-4E18-A3EB-E5EDD1840209Q33162146-91466A71-8F40-4051-BDEC-54B7539EC91DQ34395285-6DCE4BE1-ED56-48CA-AF2C-ADB4DDB97B95Q35925264-E0610524-9D84-4765-8FD3-037444C1B574Q35997414-5F582A69-9B1D-48B7-B32F-F36176AC9544Q36642676-A0051640-744E-4B66-B187-95C03AC17450Q39037073-40E90016-0D21-440F-8163-4ED860172CD9Q39167874-CC58A31C-D38D-4D9C-B43D-E1454FBAA884Q42411572-FF7E2837-CA85-4FAD-AC5E-0BBF938F4ADDQ45765566-B58A1625-F0C5-4792-99BE-2A67BA8CBF3AQ46502909-B0F49486-6C1F-4001-8AB7-C3E23ABC8E5DQ47130959-42926D61-A37C-47F4-8289-849207E8E307Q47643336-575D0319-B457-4507-ABA9-59D5F1DD5E5FQ48852728-006DBD61-BB87-4362-BF36-A693B6008F4B
P2860
Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of autotriggered me ...... tors for arrhythmia detection.
@en
Comparison of autotriggered me ...... tors for arrhythmia detection.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of autotriggered me ...... tors for arrhythmia detection.
@en
Comparison of autotriggered me ...... tors for arrhythmia detection.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of autotriggered me ...... tors for arrhythmia detection.
@en
Comparison of autotriggered me ...... tors for arrhythmia detection.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Comparison of autotriggered me ...... tors for arrhythmia detection.
@en
P2093
James A Reiffel
Maria Murry
Robert Schwarzberg
P304
P356
10.1016/J.AMJCARD.2005.01.025
P407
P577
2005-05-01T00:00:00Z