Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
about
The evolution of Müllerian mimicryThe benefits of being toxic to deter predators depends on prey body size.Ambient temperature influences birds' decisions to eat toxic prey.A mechanism for diversity in warning signals: conspicuousness versus toxicity in poison frogsOptimal-foraging predator favors commensalistic Batesian mimicry.Diversity in Müllerian mimicry: The optimal predator sampling strategy explains both local and regional polymorphism in prey.The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics.Predators' decisions to eat defended prey depend on the size of undefended preyLarval performance and kill rate of convergent ladybird beetles, Hippodamia convergens, on black bean aphids, Aphis fabae, and pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisumThe optimal sampling strategy for unfamiliar prey.Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.Aposematism: balancing salience and camouflage.Toxin constraint explains diet choice, survival and population dynamics in a molluscivore shorebird.Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity.Prey community structure affects how predators select for Mullerian mimicry.Tasting the difference: do multiple defence chemicals interact in Müllerian mimicry?Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences.How can automimicry persist when predators can preferentially consume undefended mimics?Toxicity and taste: unequal chemical defences in a mimicry ring
P2860
Q29999150-A41C4729-552C-4FD8-B41C-DE0A28479B2AQ30367329-1EAF4312-5A42-47A0-A1EE-2E2C6CA9AD0CQ30673196-F28EA1ED-EF7B-4001-A165-274AEB651AB9Q33238094-7AAB3FC6-5800-40D1-93DA-B1E065D77B99Q33377035-785E33E1-F170-4B7E-B55E-44757A9DC792Q35803042-865CD006-85AA-4789-BA11-196819BE8F92Q36237985-083E0C65-2DC1-4721-843A-975DF33F65D8Q36955775-0955612F-FF1B-4DC6-BF21-01079885A79DQ37088834-F0BEC9E5-CD5B-4411-8E26-DFDDB8DB1EA2Q39732327-66B2E3A1-39AA-4C48-A458-BBB06E58DF64Q40659478-B1010AB3-8065-42B3-AC66-3D3CDB9C66F5Q41032877-5553C1E2-D9E7-4FF4-B862-3905F279D64DQ51216571-A198BCD3-37BC-489F-9DB2-3B3A1D23F2CAQ51724270-B11AFB2E-407A-4685-9289-9164EA7B8472Q51826407-D7B3D7EC-C393-4F01-9EAD-739A7372B7C1Q51978153-3579B4F6-6032-4AC2-B3AE-53DF6A2318B6Q51994174-6BA7F4B8-3DD4-4EB2-A6AB-4B69029E677AQ52023143-CE6E738A-E0A9-436F-8184-5FAF2BE5F800Q57892799-B805958E-07C7-41C2-9FCC-8C1E07BFE848
P2860
Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年学术文章
@wuu
2004年学术文章
@zh
2004年学术文章
@zh-cn
2004年学术文章
@zh-hans
2004年学术文章
@zh-my
2004年学术文章
@zh-sg
2004年學術文章
@yue
2004年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
@en
Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
@nl
type
label
Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
@en
Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
@nl
prefLabel
Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
@en
Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
@en
P2093
Graeme D Ruxton
Michael P Speed
Thomas N Sherratt
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JTBI.2003.12.009
P407
P577
2004-05-01T00:00:00Z