Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
about
Predator feeding choice on conspicuous and non-conspicuous carabid beetles: first resultsA role for phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of aposematismAmbient temperature influences birds' decisions to eat toxic prey.Warning color changes in response to food deprivation in the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenorExperimental evidence suggests that specular reflectance and glossy appearance help amplify warning signals.Prey aggregation is an effective olfactory predator avoidance strategy.Gregariousness does not vary with geography, developmental stage, or group relatedness in feeding redheaded pine sawfly larvae.Approximating optimal behavioural strategies down to rules-of-thumb: energy reserve changes in pairs of social foragers.Seasonal changes in predator community switch the direction of selection for prey defences.Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.Reproduction in Risky Environments: The Role of Invasive Egg Predators in Ladybird Laying StrategiesDoes insect mother know under what conditions it will make their offspring live?Plant Quantity Affects Development and Survival of a Gregarious Insect Herbivore and Its Endoparasitoid Wasp.Warning coloration can be disruptive: aposematic marginal wing patterning in the wood tiger moth.Body size but not warning signal luminance influences predation risk in recently metamorphosed poison frogs.Does avian conspicuous colouration increase or reduce predation risk?Mixed-species aggregations in arthropods.Behavioural, ecological, and evolutionary aspects of diversity in frog colour patterns.Dazzle camouflage, target tracking, and the confusion effect.Evidence for the higher importance of signal size over body size in aposematic signaling in insects.Disturbed flow in an aquatic environment may create a sensory refuge for aggregated preyNot everything is black and white: color and behavioral variation reveal a continuum between cryptic and aposematic strategies in a polymorphic poison frog.The effect of social learning on avoidance of aposematic prey in juvenile great tits (Parus major).Defensive allomones function as aggregation pheromones in diapausing Ladybird Beetles, Hippodamia convergens.The anti-predator role of within-nest emergence synchrony in sea turtle hatchlings.The benefit of being a social butterfly: communal roosting deters predation.Overestimations of food abundance: predator responses to prey aggregation.The importance of pattern similarity between Müllerian mimics in predator avoidance learning.Phylogeny and evolution of Müllerian mimicry in aposematic Dilophotes: evidence for advergence and size-constraints in evolution of mimetic sexual dimorphism.A within-species warning function for an aposematic signal.Aggregation, defence and warning signals: the evolutionary relationship.Unified effects of aggregation reveal larger prey groups take longer to find.Trade-off between warning signal efficacy and mating success in the wood tiger moth.Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges?PERSPECTIVE: THE EVOLUTION OF WARNING COLORATION IS NOT PARADOXICALAvoidance of aposematic prey in European tits (Paridae): learned or innate?Ecological Correlates of Extinction Proneness in Tropical ButterfliesBetter to be bimodal: the interaction of color and odor on learning and memory
P2860
Q21128502-58A9D96D-5441-4E1D-BB7F-915553E1617BQ28765667-075E768E-B856-471F-BCFB-541FAF82EDDFQ30673196-9852A251-6932-4E25-8F6F-07A8E77766CBQ33571395-BA385A47-6B78-4861-BB38-523AC5277263Q33669819-C46C96ED-2818-4E13-BC32-5008EA1094BCQ33710529-009D1C0E-D648-4EF2-BA51-D34553F5FDBAQ33789035-B5D81165-657C-491D-BF3E-EFE7CD7F66C0Q33963906-93B54F14-A85E-442C-A05E-E241393F907AQ34348676-83251F21-BA75-402F-8B62-AFB333988EA1Q35701550-09651411-C6CB-4655-8E80-D0008AD89A19Q35816158-D865FFDA-743F-466E-9A0B-F1A0339071F5Q35855142-ACFE372D-8353-4A0C-A753-CD55A0560C13Q35952602-895B6405-B640-46C6-B02F-E8ECBB962D5EQ36325850-776FF6B3-1024-49F9-814C-CBB84447E079Q36347924-126132CF-0D2A-4167-A069-EBC38675BD97Q38427785-CF3A07F0-E820-4192-8362-E5FE79BA71FDQ38705449-803C1686-1633-479A-879D-681BE6317A9EQ38791378-30872680-BD59-469F-8F92-3578CE21809FQ41118110-1E8FAE36-333D-4C09-ABDC-CAE2AE394B40Q41202115-F66B85C0-93AD-4A93-B254-120E1181792BQ42293310-7567F048-9B9E-4E6B-B442-E5B53ACFF35CQ44902988-35BA986C-B10F-4DB2-A253-0C317AF9889BQ46346357-DE7C846C-D090-4228-A811-2456E7C63BC9Q46439000-7BC5948B-9780-44DA-81D5-9735DD466407Q51280392-D0173453-5F96-4D5E-99A1-946A15F21AD5Q51568043-80E17636-D416-4340-9087-220A8315FB11Q51681470-CA0624BF-AE98-4814-AAB8-84DF6F0F7617Q52090236-B4AA841B-706B-4656-BB20-484E1E9CADC3Q52371950-1E3E910C-CD32-41DC-A9F3-A14249D42005Q52662207-3AC3A65D-FD12-4968-AF14-8ACFC1AEF8F4Q52672154-C0B98E52-E162-4EB6-BA9D-816BD0884102Q52715709-AC7F5B61-BED8-4779-8053-A5D258E8C225Q52722102-180C6DD0-5A9B-42F0-BA92-4C8B33758D35Q53417115-1286547F-6FFA-475D-8725-3EBBC97EE79BQ55954408-2DF95E11-B608-456D-889C-EB788C4B4821Q56689020-C3A5DB30-F1E4-40E1-A4DC-4E1CE4A5B6CBQ57045428-7A2F5ADC-BC29-4AD2-8D82-33FC08B80EE4Q57277749-BF7A6075-9BAA-45AE-9A9F-F0E85E569766
P2860
Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年学术文章
@wuu
2001年学术文章
@zh
2001年学术文章
@zh-cn
2001年学术文章
@zh-hans
2001年学术文章
@zh-my
2001年学术文章
@zh-sg
2001年學術文章
@yue
2001年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
@en
Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
@nl
type
label
Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
@en
Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
@nl
prefLabel
Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
@en
Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
@en
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1038/35097061
P407
P577
2001-10-01T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1003136236