The performance of the new prognostic grade and stage groups in conservatively treated prostate cancer.

about

The performance of the new prognostic grade and stage groups in conservatively treated prostate cancer.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q52679869

description

2018 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2018年の論文

@ja

2018年学术文章

@wuu

2018年学术文章

@zh

2018年学术文章

@zh-cn

2018年学术文章

@zh-hans

2018年学术文章

@zh-my

2018年学术文章

@zh-sg

2018年學術文章

@yue

2018年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

The performance of the new pro ...... ively treated prostate cancer.

@en

The performance of the new pro ...... ively treated prostate cancer.

@nl

type

Item

label

The performance of the new pro ...... ively treated prostate cancer.

@en

The performance of the new pro ...... ively treated prostate cancer.

@nl

prefLabel

The performance of the new pro ...... ively treated prostate cancer.

@en

The performance of the new pro ...... ively treated prostate cancer.

@nl

P1476

The performance of the new pro ...... ively treated prostate cancer.

@en

P2093

Chang-Chuan Jiang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Cheng Chen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lin-Kun Hu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ren-Fang Xu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Xiao-Zhou He

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ye Chen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Risk stratification of men with Gleason score 7 to 10 tumors by primary and secondary Gleason score: results from the SEARCH database.

Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome.

Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.

A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score

Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?

Prostate cancer specific mortality and Gleason 7 disease differences in prostate cancer outcomes between cases with Gleason 4 + 3 and Gleason 3 + 4 tumors in a population based cohort.

Interobserver variability in histologic evaluation of radical prostatectomy between central and local pathologists: findings of TAX 3501 multinational clinical trial

The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Independent validation of the prognostic capacity of the ISUP prostate cancer grade grouping system for radiation treated patients with long-term follow-up.

Oncological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on New Gleason Grouping System: A Validation Study From University of Southern California With 3,755 Cases.

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.4103/AJA.AJA_5_18

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2018-02-27T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29493549

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

6038159

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string