Setting the top 10 research priorities to improve the health of people with Type 2 diabetes: a Diabetes UK-James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

about

Setting the top 10 research priorities to improve the health of people with Type 2 diabetes: a Diabetes UK-James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q52683280

description

2018 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2018年の論文

@ja

2018年学术文章

@wuu

2018年学术文章

@zh

2018年学术文章

@zh-cn

2018年学术文章

@zh-hans

2018年学术文章

@zh-my

2018年学术文章

@zh-sg

2018年學術文章

@yue

2018年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Setting the top 10 research pr ...... Priority Setting Partnership.

@en

Setting the top 10 research pr ...... Priority Setting Partnership.

@nl

type

Item

label

Setting the top 10 research pr ...... Priority Setting Partnership.

@en

Setting the top 10 research pr ...... Priority Setting Partnership.

@nl

prefLabel

Setting the top 10 research pr ...... Priority Setting Partnership.

@en

Setting the top 10 research pr ...... Priority Setting Partnership.

@nl

P1476

Setting the top 10 research pr ...... e Priority Setting Partnership

@en

P2093

A Daly

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

K Cowan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

K Shah

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P Robb

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer.

Discovering the research priorities of people with diabetes in a multicultural community: a focus group study

Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants.

The global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20-79 years: a cost-of-illness study.

Setting research priorities for Type 1 diabetes.

Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs.

The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice?

Making better decisions in groups.

The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease.

Missed opportunities for impact in patient and carer involvement: a mixed methods case study of research priority setting.

P304

862-870

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/DME.13613

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Sarah Finer

Andrew Farmer

P577

2018-03-15T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29485717

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

type-2 diabetes

P932

6032840

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string