Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.
about
Testing Dose-Dependent Effects of the Nectar Alkaloid Anabasine on Trypanosome Parasite Loads in Adult Bumble BeesPossible Synergistic Effects of Thymol and Nicotine Against Crithidia bombi Parasitism in Bumble BeesNicotine in floral nectar pharmacologically influences bumblebee learning of floral featuresDirect and Pollinator-Mediated Effects of Herbivory on Strawberry and the Potential for Improved ResistanceWild tobacco genomes reveal the evolution of nicotine biosynthesis.Herbivory as an important selective force in the evolution of floral traits and pollinator shifts.The only African wild tobacco, Nicotiana africana: alkaloid content and the effect of herbivoryImmediate effects of nectar robbing by Palestine sunbirds (Nectarinia osea) on nectar alkaloid concentrations in tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca).Chemical defense lowers plant competitiveness.Ode to Ehrlich and Raven or how herbivorous insects might drive plant speciation.Nectar sugars and amino acids in day- and night-flowering Nicotiana species are more strongly shaped by pollinators' preferences than organic acids and inorganic ions.Plant mating system transitions drive the macroevolution of defense strategiesBumble bee parasite strains vary in resistance to phytochemicals.Arranging the bouquet of disease: floral traits and the transmission of plant and animal pathogens.Ecological mechanisms for the coevolution of mating systems and defence.Context-dependent medicinal effects of anabasine and infection-dependent toxicity in bumble bees.Variable effects of nicotine, anabasine, and their interactions on parasitized bumble beesNectar Attracts Foraging Honey Bees with Components of Their Queen Pheromones.Lotus japonicus flowers are defended by a cyanogenic β-glucosidase with highly restricted expression to essential reproductive organs.Nectar and Pollen Phytochemicals Stimulate Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Immunity to Viral Infection.The impact of domestication on resistance to two generalist herbivores across 29 independent domestication events.Herbivory and floral signaling: phenotypic plasticity and tradeoffs between reproduction and indirect defense.Difference in defense strategy in flower heads and leaves of Asteraceae: multiple-species approach.Detoxification and elimination of nicotine by nectar-feeding birds.Stochastic eco-evolutionary model of a prey-predator community.Macroevolution of plant defenses against herbivores in the evening primroses.Consequences of toxic secondary compounds in nectar for mutualist bees and antagonist butterflies.Frontiers in chemical ecology and coevolution.Nectar Sugar Modulation and Cell Wall Invertases in the Nectaries of Day- and Night- Flowering Nicotiana.Nectar chemistry mediates the behavior of parasitized bees: consequences for plant fitnessCrop Domestication Alters Floral Reward Chemistry With Potential Consequences for Pollinator HealthPlant secondary metabolites in nectar: impacts on pollinators and ecological functions
P2860
Q28550765-277AC733-1F82-4C9D-A0AA-B421F7485BDEQ28551637-CF1379E1-2B56-4A0B-94DE-E49916810D96Q33694636-D04A21FA-2E38-49E0-93B9-1323C3AC1DACQ33701055-879DF71B-CB1F-4AED-853B-63E1BE58989DQ33790871-54668510-03A9-4A6F-9E08-D8FD70D13A93Q33878695-14F958A5-11F2-4A41-ADC0-1158A9DF9315Q33904922-190374B3-AC4B-4C4C-99F9-A902B8AA9122Q35137794-1F443CE3-FF45-42DD-B6DC-286FC0BC83CEQ35235419-17A5A9B4-36FD-414A-B9BB-6001C06AFA22Q36199431-30C9C21D-5A56-4F89-91C3-7839D651BFD8Q36362020-FF3365BB-19DF-4BA8-A4F6-5763FCD20770Q36673110-78789842-42A3-4920-BDA8-0914E84B86EDQ37435196-18F370D7-F937-4BEC-B3CB-723900501F3CQ38188063-894F7949-3777-4833-8E63-6A9F7C0AAFBFQ38366607-FB100258-6647-4C1B-B8EA-8099101A80C6Q38638309-4CA0D6ED-605B-42B2-A899-12FC3F3A8717Q38919415-FF5302AB-3E1F-4D66-BD42-6120030F3856Q39183347-E422A8C5-BD6D-43F3-94C2-43DC3D4AEB34Q40652792-533D21AD-A70F-4287-A3F9-4EAA2EEA97C2Q41923618-BB859B90-1E29-4521-965C-6CA6FBDFDF96Q42002465-3AF54AFE-D066-4D0A-B4C6-2663CB07909EQ42004159-F7CFA6A5-8F16-4052-A5D2-7019399449E3Q44676337-A443BE5F-D68E-4C7B-B9B1-CB288AC2BF9FQ46424430-7E237A30-ED2B-4FD0-9E38-F6BCFAE76C10Q46725064-AB7771EF-B49F-413C-82C4-E3A4838666E3Q46918344-C005FA38-7CF7-4FF4-AE0B-D461085FCA96Q50476209-A49E56D8-C02C-4433-BF9A-7C83A050C6A3Q51162272-6C1C7EE9-2F1D-41FB-9CA7-9A46B6BB98DDQ54996231-C1C86162-6463-4D33-A8FF-81C5455B2FEFQ57433333-78A99C39-A8B1-4DC3-A068-3ED4078E6B56Q57491647-3951AF4C-07BA-438B-AB92-CDC627F721AFQ59084335-99890128-1B39-422D-B1D5-219F01C144C6
P2860
Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.
@en
Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.
@nl
type
label
Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.
@en
Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.
@nl
prefLabel
Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.
@en
Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.
@en
P2093
Geoffrey E Morse
Lynn S Adler
Megan G Seifert
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1461-0248.2012.01838.X
P407
P50
P577
2012-07-26T00:00:00Z