Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.
about
Functional outcomes of acutely infected knee arthroplasty: a comparison of different surgical treatment optionsAssessment of chronic postsurgical pain after knee replacement: a systematic reviewValidation of PROMIS ® Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research.Does concomitant low back pain affect revision total knee arthroplasty outcomes?Functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty revision: new observations on the dimensional nature of outcome.Does a modified STarT Back Tool predict outcome with a broader group of musculoskeletal patients than back pain? A secondary analysis of cohort data.Development of the knee quality of life (KQoL-26) 26-item questionnaire: data quality, reliability, validity and responsivenessEfficiency of immediate postoperative inpatient physical therapy following total knee arthroplasty: an RCTRetention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.Efficacy of methylsulfonylmethane supplementation on osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled study.A 5 to 8 year follow-up study of the Rotaglide mobile bearing total knee arthroplastyHigher body mass index is not associated with worse pain outcomes after primary or revision total knee arthroplastyNurse practitioners can effectively deliver pain coping skills training to osteoarthritis patients with chronic pain: A randomized, controlled trial.A randomized controlled trial comparing patellar retention versus patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty: 5-10 year follow-up.Anabolic steroids after total knee arthroplasty. A double blinded prospective pilot study.What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients?: a systematic review of the literature.Income and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary total knee arthroplasty.Ipsilateral lower extremity joint involvement increases the risk of poor pain and function outcomes after hip or knee arthroplasty.High flexion total knee arthroplasty - mid-term follow up of 5 years.Diabetes: a risk factor for poor functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty.Usefulness of the korean knee score for evaluation of the results of total knee arthroplasty.The PROMIS physical function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness.Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index.Development of a new Knee Society scoring system.The John Insall Award: no functional advantage of a mobile bearing posterior stabilized TKAA new high-flexion knee scoring system to eliminate the ceiling effectTranslation and validation of the simplified Chinese new Knee Society Scoring System.Total knee replacement: an evidence-based analysis.How often is the office visit needed? Predicting total knee arthroplasty revision risk using pain/function scoresWhat is the Responsiveness and Respondent Burden of the New Knee Society Score?Effectiveness of prolonged use of continuous passive motion (CPM), as an adjunct to physiotherapy, after total knee arthroplastyEffect of total knee arthroplasty on type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension: A prospective study.Development and validation of a new evaluation system for patients with a floor-based lifestyle: the Korean knee score.Medical and psychological comorbidity predicts poor pain outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.Patient-reported outcome correlates with knee function after a single-design mobile-bearing TKA.The prognosis and predictors of sports function and activity at minimum 6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population cohort study.Reliability of the "American Knee Society Score" (AKSS)Change in patient concerns following total knee arthroplasty described with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a repeated measures design.Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation.Measuring the impact and distress of osteoarthritis from the patients' perspective.
P2860
Q26822261-0FFC74B7-E661-47BB-BBE7-0A7AB40C7C9EQ27008476-DF58DE8D-3510-4550-AA0A-2BF1408046FBQ28675887-1A432C70-C6FA-46B8-9138-E139150FF788Q30434630-34197B88-1EC8-4557-8CF0-BFDD5B552277Q30443784-790B24E7-1963-4131-BDD5-D8F570A70919Q31136751-FB076924-DB8C-46C5-B2D7-324A57F3B6B3Q31162183-54392F02-C8F7-4E52-88B0-75FD3EBB9724Q33255897-7EEDFDB8-C8E7-49F8-8AB7-808B3B6E116BQ33507736-AD2BADED-BD4B-4470-9B52-6D437DA59D93Q33943890-19346216-D0C0-4DC6-B438-471BCD55D694Q33989836-BE8F11E2-1121-4152-B08F-43989BEAA492Q34095551-498C95D6-12C7-4735-BD34-1D927BEA5F8AQ34224287-A16031A4-FFB9-4871-BD53-95116EA5B736Q34296272-ED42955D-2F70-4107-998E-8393594C89FEQ34439229-C8FE54AE-0C6E-47CB-A3C7-E2F49F296C15Q34477093-78C86058-3860-4776-ACDF-427B8FC19701Q34623081-399A0AAF-0CEE-480A-B9A0-0EB4C4A37F69Q34759591-F43749A8-FEBE-4D12-8A3A-D2F5FBDD49B2Q34978569-417AD8E2-8A57-4B30-B11D-3A6E0E38F650Q35043666-7734AA7A-525A-4CC0-B470-B03C7806DFD3Q35147411-C3AA5D42-A0CA-4F75-BA5D-DCB9D243AE2AQ35335106-585D24C6-D8B7-4D87-A5E8-3FEB435378AFQ35554718-B22FA1D0-5201-4CAB-8252-BB01453E0C59Q35613778-79562AF1-C2A7-49D5-B671-A798A4D65912Q35613863-95B34C41-7CF9-472A-8A09-0218779B7792Q35663268-5BDCA8A0-98E8-4439-8F1A-1C8347EFD90BQ35874685-A975AEC4-1F44-47EF-9DFE-8EE6A468B1AEQ36056179-227BDBEF-7FAB-4F39-B858-270DADFF62FAQ36110634-8919EE76-33A3-4813-86C7-B5383DB9F465Q36335313-D6B51D72-C83F-4ED9-AC44-3903532579F5Q36662314-465F292D-F4C1-4C44-977F-F6FED9556A57Q36695158-C3CCD14C-64F2-44DD-8C93-150AFDADAA27Q36732327-297BBE2D-2CD4-4FCD-B649-F16D475E6BCBQ36778535-A15597FC-00D4-4D64-841F-ADA88F82EAF3Q36931411-35302241-9AE6-46F9-80D5-FF175B628667Q36954606-22B89D99-06DD-416C-8855-24C62B4A6393Q37032585-F4DBE86B-4501-4AA4-8473-D97F7F4887CFQ37040165-3D64C97E-1C54-46FA-8BEA-F106795C957DQ37185567-418302BA-67FB-44E7-BB2E-85198D3A406BQ37196356-4BC6F0EB-5537-44EB-A90A-A9841B1173FB
P2860
Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年学术文章
@wuu
2001年学术文章
@zh
2001年学术文章
@zh-cn
2001年学术文章
@zh-hans
2001年学术文章
@zh-my
2001年学术文章
@zh-sg
2001年學術文章
@yue
2001年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Validity and responsiveness of ...... ison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.
@en
Validity and responsiveness of ...... ison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.
@nl
type
label
Validity and responsiveness of ...... ison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.
@en
Validity and responsiveness of ...... ison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.
@nl
prefLabel
Validity and responsiveness of ...... ison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.
@en
Validity and responsiveness of ...... ison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Validity and responsiveness of ...... rison with the SF-36 and WOMAC
@en
P2093
C B Sledge
E A Lingard
E A Wright
Kinemax Outcomes Group
R J Wright
P304
P356
10.2106/00004623-200112000-00014
P407
P577
2001-12-01T00:00:00Z