Prospective evaluation of the reliability, validity, and minimally important difference of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-gastric (FACT-Ga) quality-of-life instrument.
about
Quality of life: A critical outcome for all surgical treatments of gastric cancerEvaluation of the psychometric properties of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix questionnaire in Brazil.Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer.Validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-gastric module for the Chinese population.Measuring patient-reported outcomes in advanced gastric cancerEffective palliation and quality of life outcomes in studies of surgery for advanced, non-curative gastric cancer: a systematic review.Measuring symptoms in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of assessment instruments.Clinical and psychometric validation of the quality of life assessment system for advanced gastric cancer based on traditional Chinese medicine.Validity of the Japanese version of functional assessment of cancer therapy-gastric (FACT-Ga) and its sensitivity to ascites volume change: a retrospective analysis of Japanese clinical trial participants.Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Cancer Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Assessment Tool: A Literature Review.Randomized clinical trial comparing long-term quality of life for Billroth I versus Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Clinical Benefit and Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Patients Treated with Cisplatin/S-1 Versus Cisplatin/5-FU: Secondary End Point Results From the First-Line Advanced Gastric Cancer Study (FLAGS).The quality of life trajectory of resected gastric cancer.Phase I study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin for locally advanced gastric cancer (Neo G-SOX PI).
P2860
Q26774542-0029E2C8-3960-4B15-8057-5CDCAA67B12DQ35023494-33A79EF4-A2DB-4639-84E3-D3722CD20C82Q35756607-31E9FDAA-B232-43AE-BD5A-B195259AE41AQ36462955-A47576C6-681D-4C92-9CBC-EEAF1E1059F8Q37181422-B81B1A80-C09A-420B-AD99-E54621944218Q37897489-D2415C75-E098-4C5B-AC2C-3281C338C72CQ38215310-DD93BAB2-D141-4EB3-AF31-D71F9248804CQ38853461-3F3CECB7-52F2-4196-ACA7-44E222F1839CQ39703529-9A4D52E7-B519-41D9-A195-289D6CB14570Q47110902-703DE87C-474F-4B90-8BF6-73BCB0A590ECQ47836567-5559A33C-9C45-4B51-B8F5-E3788FA82A28Q48048391-73EF80B5-0CD3-4302-A901-3EA9CB4E7AC6Q48542636-2B4B00A2-C58C-47DA-9D9C-2569D0C7E714Q55005321-5658F4EF-E079-4D2A-9F5B-2A2E255F3FFE
P2860
Prospective evaluation of the reliability, validity, and minimally important difference of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-gastric (FACT-Ga) quality-of-life instrument.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Prospective evaluation of the ...... a) quality-of-life instrument.
@en
Prospective evaluation of the ...... a) quality-of-life instrument.
@nl
type
label
Prospective evaluation of the ...... a) quality-of-life instrument.
@en
Prospective evaluation of the ...... a) quality-of-life instrument.
@nl
prefLabel
Prospective evaluation of the ...... a) quality-of-life instrument.
@en
Prospective evaluation of the ...... a) quality-of-life instrument.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Prospective evaluation of the ...... a) quality-of-life instrument.
@en
P2093
Andrew Lawe
Bradly J Biagioni
David Cella
Guy Pelletier
Michael Eliasziw
Oliver F Bathe
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/CNCR.25556
P407
P577
2010-10-19T00:00:00Z