Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory.
about
The evidence-policy divide: a 'critical computational linguistics' approach to the language of 18 health agency CEOs from 9 countriesThe lived experience of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in young people receiving etanercept.How to improve vital sign data quality for use in clinical decision support systems? A qualitative study in nine Swedish emergency departmentsInterview-based Qualitative Research in Emergency Care Part II: Data Collection, Analysis and Results ReportingPharmacogenomics in diverse practice settings: implementation beyond major metropolitan areasMethodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: a research reviewRights and Responsibilities of Tuberculosis Patients, and the Global Fund: A Qualitative StudyUniversal Health Coverage's evolving location in the post-2015 development agenda: Key informant perspectives within multilateral and related agencies during the first phase of post-2015 negotiations.Sexual and reproductive health and rights in the evolving post-2015 agenda: perspectives from key players from multilateral and related agencies in 2013.What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies.Music Therapy and Spiritual Care in End-of-Life: A Qualitative Inquiry into Ethics and Training Issues Identified by Chaplains and Music Therapists.The social determinants of health and health service access: an in depth study in four poor communities in Phnom Penh CambodiaActing Out: Enabling Meaningful Participation Among People With Long-Term Mental Health Problems in a Music and Theater Workshop.Sources of stress and coping in American college students who have been diagnosed with depression.Differential experiences of discrimination among ethnoracially diverse persons experiencing mental illness and homelessnessHostility During Training: Historical Roots of Primary Care DisparagementAcupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: a protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.Breastfeeding the late preterm infant: experiences of mothers and perceptions of public health nurses.Life trajectories, genetic testing, and risk reduction decisions in 18-39 year old women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Development of a cross-cultural HPV community engagement model within Scotland.Comparison of focus groups on cancer and employment conducted face to face or by telephoneSecurity and skills: the two key issues in health worker migration.Rethinking risk: gender and injection drug-related HIV risk among female sex workers and their non-commercial partners along the Mexico-U.S. border.Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality-based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trialStudy protocol of EMPOWER participatory action research (EMPOWER-PAR): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of multifaceted chronic disease management strategies to improve diabetes and hypertension outcomes in primary care.Using health provider insights to inform pediatric HIV disclosure: a qualitative study and practice framework from Kenya.Controlled trial of a collaborative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depression: rationale and design for a comprehensive evaluation.The PROactive innovative conceptual framework on physical activitySilent loss and the clinical encounter: Parents' and physicians' experiences of stillbirth-a qualitative analysis."Those comments last forever": parents and grandparents of preschoolers recount how they became aware of their own body weights as children"I wouldn't be this firm if I didn't care": preventive clinical counseling for reproductive health.Current practices of suicide risk management protocols in research.Encountering abuse in health care; lifetime experiences in postnatal women - a qualitative study."A little on the heavy side": a qualitative analysis of parents' and grandparents' perceptions of preschoolers' body weights.Experiencing everyday ethics in context: frontline data collectors perspectives and practices of bioethicsCharacteristics and experiences of patients with localized prostate cancer who left an active surveillance program.HIV, violence and women: unmet mental health care needs.An online evidence based medicine exercise prompts reflection in third year medical studentsAlexithymia, emotional dysregulation, and recovery from alcoholism: therapeutic response to assessment of moodWhy underserved patients do not consult their general practitioner for depression: results of a qualitative and a quantitative survey at a free outpatient clinic in Paris, France.
P2860
Q24288953-ACE39304-47FE-4004-8BA2-926712526BC5Q27303519-FF4961C8-D961-4DE2-89C2-5ABEC172CF0EQ27307735-A575E1C1-934F-47E2-A820-65333BF6FF41Q27315969-6E73529E-6508-428B-A9AB-914CB8FCF52FQ27335306-D22FF764-D17A-4781-9C24-4CED177B6DE1Q28392268-4987B5FB-EA47-4D80-87DD-D8453764C7DAQ28550902-65E308F4-E999-4099-A550-842B51568D56Q30062116-B9CBE6BC-C74A-4452-BD59-FF2F6A8C665DQ30062189-A55982AA-F032-4DB0-B1D7-41916FD3B3C7Q30384307-1B3D043F-79F8-43DA-B8C0-52E17F29E586Q30389923-19686C3A-294F-44C6-8B65-DC31F31BA46DQ30394676-BC9709AC-5648-495D-B195-9B0AE28E794AQ30395790-CEB82389-73AD-4DD5-BDCB-1C7E0431CC07Q30419637-AB1B13AA-079E-461C-AD3D-CD55EFFED7B9Q30611274-90341127-CA00-4096-A784-AAC6F76552EFQ33572138-D140419E-8DAD-482D-80B9-7FBBFFFDB2A8Q33610964-A81E163E-1DA2-4F12-8596-26766C39A665Q33651523-78546BE2-019A-4D6A-BC6F-DDAA405D072CQ33710013-E4E8469D-EB8B-432F-B530-1444BA7B1397Q33732071-A2C7AEA8-51E2-4438-B092-72BF8696ECBBQ33805042-21B569DC-9D57-431A-B813-2E01851EDED8Q33977646-FA267DED-9EC4-40A8-BD1C-32592DF7C6ACQ34047059-EC5C09E0-4502-47F9-A512-A292F6F5A4AEQ34203657-BE742814-7056-4CF5-854A-0962F2215DBEQ34241759-5EA624A4-5147-451E-8E2A-8A303E26656AQ34283983-2E796017-53FF-482F-BC2C-14D52772B0CEQ34381700-BD9A4132-CE10-40F3-9056-4CA22C5C7286Q34436896-A6EB1012-C902-4470-83CE-F9E4D8D75E0AQ34488559-65F83FFD-2D46-4233-A1A6-7EE5F926DD3CQ34505711-B2DB38DC-3B91-4195-857E-D35F544B2A1CQ34511011-6D981B70-8582-4032-8B91-6C3D598A266DQ34572134-00A5CC7E-5EAF-4593-A8D7-F2D622E302A0Q34632568-1AA3DFF7-19E4-44ED-B81A-E42D70E0D59BQ34692409-E285F9FE-7563-44A0-A168-06B94582426EQ35037745-928D6A2E-A372-4D79-8F76-148EACA1DAC6Q35095972-029B308F-FF69-4A32-8AB8-5A55D4DB7506Q35122334-142D1F2A-75C9-4315-88B9-7B4773169F5EQ35222005-37BEE780-AE33-4591-AF82-495A22D367A2Q35587367-E1C98C69-1448-48DA-B999-A597A37923E2Q35624544-C35048A8-2423-4095-B773-072A740D362B
P2860
Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Choose your method: a comparis ...... analysis, and grounded theory.
@en
Choose your method: a comparis ...... analysis, and grounded theory.
@nl
type
label
Choose your method: a comparis ...... analysis, and grounded theory.
@en
Choose your method: a comparis ...... analysis, and grounded theory.
@nl
prefLabel
Choose your method: a comparis ...... analysis, and grounded theory.
@en
Choose your method: a comparis ...... analysis, and grounded theory.
@nl
P356
P1476
Choose your method: a comparis ...... analysis, and grounded theory.
@en
P2093
Helene Starks
P304
P356
10.1177/1049732307307031
P577
2007-12-01T00:00:00Z