Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram.

Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q53477269

about

Post-surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations Current adjuvant treatment modalities for gastric cancer: From history to the future Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions D1 versus D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer Point-of-care testing in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancers: current technology and future directions Laparoscopic gastric surgery for cancer: where do we stand?Systematic review of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer.Evolution in the surgical management of gastric cancer: is extended lymph node dissection back in vogue in the USA?Comparison of disease-specific survival in the United States and Korea after resection for early-stage node-negative gastric carcinoma Prognostic impact of the c-MET polymorphism on the clinical outcome in locoregional gastric cancer patients.Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer: an update meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.Surgical management of gastric cancer: the East vs. West perspective Validation of the memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram to predict disease-specific survival after R0 resection in a Chinese gastric cancer population.Survival nomogram for curatively resected Korean gastric cancer patients: multicenter retrospective analysis with external validation.Changes of lipid profiles after radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.Evaluation of the 7th UICC TNM Staging System of Gastric Cancer Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling of advanced gastric carcinoma cases reveals frequent clinically relevant genomic alterations and new routes for targeted therapies.Treatment of resectable gastric cancer.Current management and future strategies of gastric cancer.Conditional survival analysis in Korean patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative gastrectomy.Comparisons of Gastric Cancer Treatments: East vs. West.The New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging system for adenocarcinoma of the stomach: increased complexity without clear improvement in predictive accuracy.Comparison of Delta-Shape Anastomosis and Extracorporeal Billroth I Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.Clinical characteristics of hepatoduodenal lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer The Effects of Helicobacter pylori on the prognosis of patients with curatively resected gastric cancers in a population with high infection rate.Differences in gastric cancer survival between the U.S. and China Impact of marital status on survival of gastric adenocarcinoma patients: Results from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database Phase II study of modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.MET expression and amplification in patients with localized gastric cancer.Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: review and update of current practices.Loss of ARID1A expression predicts poor survival prognosis in gastric cancer: a systematic meta-analysis from 14 studies.Different survival outcomes after curative R0-resection for Eastern Asian and European gastric cancer: Results from a propensity score matched analysis comparing a Korean and a German specialized center.Adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer: chemotherapy versus radiation Different lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer from Korean: What is the best prognostic assessment tool?Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula in curative gastric cancer surgery.Survival of korean adult cancer patients by stage at diagnosis, 2006-2010: national cancer registry study Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the West: A Case-Control Study.FOLFIRI as a second-line therapy in patients with docetaxel-pretreated gastric cancer: a historical cohort.

P2860

Q24198252-55BD1201-F378-48EC-B97B-04D19376C6FF Q26739046-7E88F62C-5397-42D3-AEA1-B55FA1CA785D Q26748744-E641BB7E-CAF0-4BF6-971A-CD67CF3B28C9 Q26766111-09B67EF3-9903-40A7-B1FA-F7DFBF154D2A Q26863293-73C07AC1-8C85-4621-8449-335794C2FBC3 Q27000391-63052614-F23A-44BF-8842-B446197C503C Q27000944-82F9AD84-1141-493B-92F2-015FA2FEBC11 Q27693303-48F01B1F-34A5-4FDE-B4BC-8DABC42137A3 Q30851464-7FFF431A-7B52-4EBE-BA04-618C6E20D86C Q33912865-7DB78AF3-CFD8-46EB-8C5E-F8F58F966D8B Q34269220-72BBC441-A143-4559-8BCB-88884FD3094A Q34446136-5CEB1CEC-077F-478F-A4DE-3D9CE048F183 Q34567138-CEBDF00D-2C0D-4B1E-AF52-2F937892A695 Q34962070-174802B6-7238-4E0B-ABB2-2F828A9910DD Q35022599-BB5FCBC1-AE5D-4FB4-90B8-ABA5C1993EAF Q35130204-46063EB1-3238-4A5E-829D-AF5C4A95B628 Q35218727-D34C2DD8-5329-473B-9F25-9EEBAB5379FB Q35481147-768ADCD6-08D7-4366-9D2D-12B524574118 Q35586700-1C43D652-5641-4F57-AE4F-BA7CC3C9FDF1 Q35688584-8A72BE66-FD8E-448B-B7C1-864E2BECEF94 Q35767395-BB0A1C1A-F3CD-4960-B414-A2BEA5EF6333 Q35877315-E60950A1-D0C9-4627-9C88-795DABD6C4D3 Q36083593-769B6476-6D0C-413A-B841-1DD763C152D6 Q36113713-25118037-5150-4214-8D99-BB5590BC2DB6 Q36133784-54AA96B5-2FEE-446C-AC56-BBD9308833B6 Q36145277-DFA09621-B01F-44A1-BC61-102B4EC2DCC8 Q36306523-892CDCF4-65A0-49CF-A87F-DBBC7775A4C3 Q36341684-25543E0B-5F8E-465A-865E-A8DAD0EE376C Q36579491-42A2C1FB-A0B5-48D1-B5FC-CD0ED585F63A Q36822182-09B80876-5A65-453D-A69F-8541893E91BF Q36949256-DC214F00-CC06-4177-8307-1BB9739517D2 Q37046529-358EA67E-D33B-4389-8836-1DD80F1115EF Q37050045-9FB42497-7F09-420E-8DB0-F1E2355BD083 Q37116949-278E97A5-23B8-45C4-AB87-30DE7E49C7EC Q37191333-E2B6C0DC-D1C7-4718-8882-0A686CB1C4DF Q37205096-8D35FE40-A9DE-4BFC-B3A6-BA88F4B42B05 Q37245736-7B67A34C-13A2-4239-B88F-C554D580D348 Q37245897-F9082778-399E-44D2-BD14-0E9FD492F643 Q37310952-717C5878-825B-47AE-87B3-E1FB59D303B5 Q37362737-964FD88D-B3C2-4565-A526-DB243E4F3622

P2860

Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q53477269

description

2010 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2010年の論文

@ja

2010年学术文章

@wuu

2010年学术文章

@zh

2010年学术文章

@zh-cn

2010年学术文章

@zh-hans

2010年学术文章

@zh-my

2010年学术文章

@zh-sg

2010年學術文章

@yue

2010年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Comparison of gastric cancer s ...... nationally validated nomogram.

@en

Comparison of gastric cancer s ...... nationally validated nomogram.

@nl

type

label

Comparison of gastric cancer s ...... nationally validated nomogram.

@en

Comparison of gastric cancer s ...... nationally validated nomogram.

@nl

prefLabel

Comparison of gastric cancer s ...... nationally validated nomogram.

@en

Comparison of gastric cancer s ...... nationally validated nomogram.

@nl

P1433

Q53477269-2B404D1C-54DE-4B40-9A58-6BB56CCCF6E2

P1476

Q53477269-AEA79699-CB91-43EA-9EBD-8ADB2541DC1B

P2093

Q53477269-3975BBCF-1F8D-487C-87EB-663FC9CF5FAA

Q53477269-8731A649-E5C4-4233-A95B-516BF07CD230

Q53477269-89365584-264B-4F54-A19B-08E47BF133E0

Q53477269-94041719-CDA6-417A-A481-3238D5B35A8C

Q53477269-B1D75BCF-2F2B-442A-A2B6-4DF3B5EF9C11

Q53477269-D70BAF18-3B7C-4D97-AE3F-0114AB44ABF0

Q53477269-FBC172AD-68C4-49E1-9EA0-B28E6D14357E

P304

Q53477269-70ADA0A6-38A8-4F71-8B06-C3BD9358C69E

P31

Q53477269-1A1E4170-B5FD-4848-8E8D-061F0A72986A

P356

Q53477269-CA054A5E-1134-4864-9C2F-5861487C7EB2

P407

Q53477269-215F7959-B74A-4C4C-A57D-7B27E63B4A1C

P433

Q53477269-A39C8913-D02D-410F-BE6A-FAA309F25CC9

P478

Q53477269-59181912-3882-4BF7-9207-A7A57FEA5A07

P50

Q53477269-91696B09-CB22-492F-B2BA-6EEE18E0C018

P577

Q53477269-53BF79A2-B6DE-4FB9-85B0-3451E7AACF68

P698

Q53477269-558EEEF6-1ED2-446C-B158-F06FFF1C2DED

P356

SLA.0B013E3181D3D29B

P1433

Annals of Surgery

P1476

Comparison of gastric cancer s ...... nationally validated nomogram.

@en

P2093

Cho Hyun Park

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Daniel G Coit

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kyo Young Song

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lindsay M Jacks

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Manish Shah

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mithat Gonen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Vivian E Strong

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P304

640-646

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1097/SLA.0B013E3181D3D29B

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

251

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2010-04-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

20224369

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string