Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
about
Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indicationsDevelopments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal CancerCT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening StrategiesPotentially Important Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography: Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.Indeterminate but Likely Unimportant Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography (C-RADS Category E3): Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.CT colonography screening: ready for prime time?CT colonography: advanced computer-aided detection scheme utilizing MTANNs for detection of "missed" polyps in a multicenter clinical trial.Individualizing colonoscopy screening by sex and race.Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk North Americans: an economic evaluation.At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know?Objective and Subjective Intrapatient Comparison of Iohexol Versus Diatrizoate for Bowel Preparation Quality at CT ColonographyCT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination.Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.An evidence-based microsimulation model for colorectal cancer: validation and applicationCost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare populationCost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview.Virtual gastrointestinal colonoscopy in combination with large bowel endoscopy: clinical applicationIntra-individual comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for bowel preparation at CT colonography: automated volumetric analysis of residual fluid for quality assessmentCost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.Estimating the unknown parameters of the natural history of metachronous colorectal cancer using discrete-event simulation.Computer disease simulation models: integrating evidence for health policy.Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screeningCost Differences After Initial CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy in the ElderlyAutomated volumetric analysis for comparison of oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) with established cathartic agents at CT colonography.Screening methods for early detection of colorectal cancers and polyps: summary of evidence-based analysesMedicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.Quantitative radiology: automated measurement of polyp volume in computed tomography colonography using Hessian matrix-based shape extraction and volume growingColorectal Polyps Missed with Optical Colonoscopy Despite Previous Detection and Localization with CT Colonography.Clarifying differences in natural history between models of screening: the case of colorectal cancerScreening CT colonography: multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence.Variation in diagnostic performance among radiologists at screening CT colonographyComputed tomographic colonography for colorectal cancer screening: risk factors for the detection of advanced neoplasia.Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years: results from VA Cooperative Studies Program 380.Choosing between CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnostic context: a qualitative study of influences on patient preferences.Review of economic evidence in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer.Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): climax of a new era of validation and transition into community practice.Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.Minimum-invasive early diagnosis of colorectal cancer with CT colonography: techniques and clinical value.
P2860
Q26744300-43D7B22E-ACDF-48B7-B5A6-28C5146EBB73Q26778581-AB6859FD-094A-46A1-AB08-873903CFDBEEQ27011424-311AEC6B-7F5C-4512-A00C-7983F1F1719DQ28087292-91539C1D-D9D8-4B29-91D5-FB6270EE76ECQ31009677-E359C7F7-17CE-436B-8C44-028DBBDCC6A0Q31120543-6D36C066-ED84-41FF-9DFC-66CA8AF19575Q33554533-602365C1-F88B-44AE-AF84-5DD2384D84D0Q33571706-6E4D8A35-8BEE-43C1-9910-97EE2F9E8E1FQ33588581-3A0DF7E0-F914-43E7-A7DD-02A869B2AB3EQ33761052-051D08E1-5167-4241-AB45-C5EE00B0AF14Q33810469-2F1C61FB-B091-4137-8C30-22687E1DC93FQ33874772-61907D42-3554-461C-9827-89D94FC0A428Q33913244-040AC76A-8207-4A49-9061-B0D95A718F7DQ33913257-1AB12675-162D-4E75-A5CA-86A405AD9190Q33981053-4F6D03E0-FADB-4F90-B7B0-B243F99709F0Q34058114-EC004279-FEED-4A7F-B334-4618A82C6AD4Q34071763-F3305899-70A3-43BD-A9A7-FC06CE49B849Q34125840-870B68D7-72DE-45C3-894E-F0D6F9254C50Q34326632-8A05303A-53CA-4184-822E-CA2C2ABB990BQ34361398-3E417E25-6F52-4037-B40F-EFCE821FD31CQ34420202-D329EB9B-2D36-4341-A3C0-1BD12C216219Q35050728-3279F5DB-148B-4ADB-A879-B143BED0494FQ35074556-8840B05E-F78F-491E-8B08-2430E3B207EEQ35095108-9CB1CCD6-4BE7-432C-8D22-BE7034320AE1Q35564808-22AAACB1-2F13-48A4-9C4F-3FB38D2441D3Q35985192-524CB893-DC08-48C1-B962-DC7CEF286D56Q36039910-A699917B-F5DD-4F28-8F0A-B9CBAFFC9439Q36236068-6DEF8D4B-BEC8-4BDE-9AF5-2466BE826C07Q36352637-9BA974C4-EEDA-4BE9-AB6F-98946B5514D0Q36483921-F0902064-1A3E-4130-90E4-0AC6ED206991Q36493426-6B9D0698-9D55-4FFB-8EF8-511C2D4F8EDDQ36945833-7F8329A9-34AC-42EB-9C4D-0E149FCF24DBQ36946475-0072F446-F8E1-434C-BDEA-6F8B38E0CB1DQ36980056-551573A2-99B5-4260-958B-DB848EDF738FQ37060748-45F0D118-7977-4A62-90CF-60A53D700267Q37332385-3D813D34-8553-4554-BC23-160A1C394300Q37356637-FDA01C7C-1E29-427A-9320-E5CC38CBC7BFQ37427806-950D5D7F-BF27-487F-9435-8B5003436E91Q37688398-3F62990D-9135-4F2C-A2E8-B17B3966908EQ38089943-0A7B383C-715B-4B45-B470-ECE987638413
P2860
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Cost-effectiveness of colorect ...... reporting diminutive lesions.
@en
Cost-effectiveness of colorect ...... reporting diminutive lesions.
@nl
type
label
Cost-effectiveness of colorect ...... reporting diminutive lesions.
@en
Cost-effectiveness of colorect ...... reporting diminutive lesions.
@nl
prefLabel
Cost-effectiveness of colorect ...... reporting diminutive lesions.
@en
Cost-effectiveness of colorect ...... reporting diminutive lesions.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
Cost-effectiveness of colorect ...... reporting diminutive lesions.
@en
P2093
David H Kim
Perry J Pickhardt
Sergio Morini
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/CNCR.22668
P407
P577
2007-06-01T00:00:00Z