Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?
about
Quality of life data in older adults: self-assessment vs interview.Confirmatory factor analysis of the validity of the SF-12 for persons with and without a history of strokeAssessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations.The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty.Falls and confidence related quality of life outcome measures in an older British cohortFactor structure of the Singapore English version of the KINDL children quality of life questionnaireLongitudinal patient-oriented outcomes in neuropathy: Importance of early detection and falls.Quality-of-life measurement in chronic heart failure: do we take account of the patient perspective?A multicenter cross-sectional study of mental and physical health depression in MHD patientsQuality of life in older people: a structured review of self-assessed health instruments.Health and quality of life outcomesMeasurement bias of the SF-36 Health Survey in older adults with chronic conditions.A lifestyle intervention as supplement to a physical activity programme in rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Problems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities. The reliability and validity of the SF-36 and the effect of cognitive impairment.Performance of a mail-administered version of a stroke-specific outcome measure, the Stroke Impact Scale.Function and disability in late life: comparison of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument to the Short-Form-36 and the London Handicap Scale.Health status in patients with Alzheimer's disease: an investigation of inter-rater agreement.A review of stroke outcome measures valid and reliable for administration by postal surveyLate Life Function and Disability Instrument: II. Development and Evaluation of the Function Component
P2860
Q30839315-1A50A126-6C6C-4B94-9AFC-FB7333849670Q34185649-4672FA3F-E24F-4232-A6DE-592118E52702Q34329733-19F4EEF8-4FBC-4050-A72B-2A2EE4660D15Q35429235-252B9BA1-C471-44CD-80C3-92ACA66BBE0DQ35510586-99B71D53-460C-4875-9915-A84BCD17010CQ35633123-8305362E-D315-4027-A6A8-9E09F223189EQ35850724-F14CC213-D603-4555-AB9F-9B3C11833575Q36142228-5E355CF5-657A-4F44-860B-502B3756D4CFQ36391008-29BB5ABE-4611-446B-B3E8-BAC6E227C698Q37763181-9C003610-B684-4344-AB23-0ABCEF9EB1D5Q41956076-5C21C05A-DDFE-4ECB-B55D-67D89960009FQ48285603-102628BA-80D9-4E61-A34B-6A26057EE5E6Q48786570-BBD65B56-405A-45BF-BCC7-781C35FC4828Q51961622-22493B59-46CA-400B-80E7-F3D55018930AQ52942285-C936D14B-4B7B-480B-81A6-DA6300B43A83Q53338675-E44E6CD0-34A4-4FA1-BB4E-2DBB6170D93EQ53379082-04D1D2ED-C14D-40BC-89B8-27ACF4D4F7EAQ56592938-8B534876-D919-4A29-A741-6C29CB902A40Q58392169-79B3F635-ED07-4C28-AD15-57FBB816D572
P2860
Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?
description
1998 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1998年の論文
@ja
1998年学术文章
@wuu
1998年学术文章
@zh
1998年学术文章
@zh-cn
1998年学术文章
@zh-hans
1998年学术文章
@zh-my
1998年学术文章
@zh-sg
1998年學術文章
@yue
1998年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?
@en
Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?
@nl
type
label
Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?
@en
Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?
@nl
prefLabel
Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?
@en
Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?
@nl
P2093
P356
P1433
P1476
Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients?
@en
P2093
P356
10.1093/AGEING/27.1.19
P577
1998-01-01T00:00:00Z