about
The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.How should treatment decisions be made for incapacitated patients, and why?Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.Should informed consent for cancer treatment include a discussion about hospital outcome disparities?Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants.T cell activation causes diarrhea by increasing intestinal permeability and inhibiting epithelial Na+/K+-ATPase.Returning individual research results: development of a cancer genetics education and risk communication protocolInformed consent for research and authorization under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule: an integrated approach.Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: interest, impact, and demands on researchers.Teleoncology for gynecologic cancers.Geographic access to gynecologic cancer care in the United States.Non-surgical management of ovarian cancer: Prevalence and implications.Building a better advance directive: next steps.Interactions with industry under the Sunshine Act: an example from gynecologic oncology.Are patients willing to travel for better ovarian cancer care?Typical-use contraception and pharmaceutical research.Research in pregnancy: back to first principles.Ethical analysis of communicating the risk of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants.Suggestibility of Oncologists' Clinical Estimates.Access to gynecologic oncology care and the network adequacy standardSurvival implications of staging lymphadenectomy for non-endometrioid endometrial cancersReplyAbstract 3726: Race-based disparities in loss of functional independence after uterine cancerShared Decision-Making and the Lower Literate PatientDoes surgical treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia require referral to a gynecologic oncologist?Iterative adaptation process for eHealth Mindful Movement and Breathing to improve gynecologic cancer surgery outcomes
P50
Q33236318-9D6D5EDC-DFCC-471F-B274-1D5E25A980B2Q33280132-3D0B3FB5-6529-4D69-BCFF-259E273EA9E8Q33334605-96180495-B333-46EA-8ECD-CCC151BD144FQ33378677-0C0FDC93-9802-41A0-A321-E9673D1ECD76Q34441798-7E39CDAF-3E47-49C2-8197-DC78570E0F74Q34816745-B106A968-3F0F-4851-A292-5B388CDD189EQ35173889-C3CC30FD-B8DA-4D3C-A562-5B72D8793C46Q36466857-C64FEB0B-FF00-4517-8DAC-F496CDAEC69AQ37324432-F7430E09-37DF-4B11-BD44-BA60AF296201Q38543534-D62CA06B-F72D-47E2-8947-18944550590EQ39013118-505FBF24-5AA7-4C2F-9F43-71F033718858Q39827859-A565DAD0-461C-4842-9D51-6E0D25738AA9Q39884364-F2F91F7E-9AC6-46C5-9970-A5D3128119C7Q39978054-20C925A0-E304-4AB6-BC5E-6865E70C07D9Q47636216-BC7FA2AF-C6E2-4A8F-9CE6-02541AA3EFFEQ48429371-0D9B3455-F41E-472D-B8F3-A013E9161C22Q48681631-6A3C98CF-3D80-4AB1-B967-9EFA64B3E1DFQ49134178-5E0DE3AE-2EDD-4492-A033-4A80A378EC6FQ53132496-14127D6B-575F-4E58-B094-444C7EAE716CQ53423479-B787E0DF-F713-4190-BFB5-85850AB6872AQ57269367-5B0A0408-62CA-4B7D-830E-55865B1B01D0Q57269370-F3F17E33-4515-4F08-9B5B-F45F271A5FF5Q57269374-3E5A223A-2D19-4AAD-94F4-CDE6E9AFB35DQ57269378-EC0E78B3-97EF-497C-9145-02007EA4764BQ57269393-061F0CAB-42B1-4856-A865-C5A02ECCC936Q90349531-96A76C49-B0C7-4072-AB45-74CBE679194CQ92895681-65B97498-EBC5-4024-8182-B742C503E25E
P50
description
researcher
@en
wetenschapper
@nl
հետազոտող
@hy
name
David I Shalowitz
@nl
David I Shalowitz
@sl
David I. Shalowitz
@en
David I. Shalowitz
@es
type
label
David I Shalowitz
@nl
David I Shalowitz
@sl
David I. Shalowitz
@en
David I. Shalowitz
@es
prefLabel
David I Shalowitz
@nl
David I Shalowitz
@sl
David I. Shalowitz
@en
David I. Shalowitz
@es
P108
P106
P108
P1153
6507689230
P21
P31
P496
0000-0002-5189-4687