Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

about

Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q55384078

description

2018 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2018年の論文

@ja

2018年学术文章

@wuu

2018年学术文章

@zh-cn

2018年学术文章

@zh-hans

2018年学术文章

@zh-my

2018年学术文章

@zh-sg

2018年學術文章

@yue

2018年學術文章

@zh

2018年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Comparison of optical quality ...... laser in situ keratomileusis.

@en

Comparison of optical quality ...... laser in situ keratomileusis.

@nl

type

Item

label

Comparison of optical quality ...... laser in situ keratomileusis.

@en

Comparison of optical quality ...... laser in situ keratomileusis.

@nl

prefLabel

Comparison of optical quality ...... laser in situ keratomileusis.

@en

Comparison of optical quality ...... laser in situ keratomileusis.

@nl

P1476

Comparison of optical quality ...... laser in situ keratomileusis.

@en

P2093

Hong-Ting Liu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jian-Zhong Huang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jiang-Xia Wang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Li Li

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Min Kong

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Min Li

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Owhofasa Agbedia

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Wen-Jing He

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Wu-Qiang Luo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Xin Gao

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Objective assessment of transient corneal haze and its relation to visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy.

Implantable contact lens for high myopia.

Bilateral comparison of wavefront-guided versus conventional laser in situ keratomileusis with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix.

Comparison of NIDEK CATz wavefront-guided LASIK to traditional LASIK with the NIDEK CXII excimer laser in myopia.

Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia.

Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.

Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.

Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.

Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

Comparison of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation using the double-pass instrument.

P304

656-661

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.18240/IJO.2018.04.20

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2018-04-18T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29675387

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5902373

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string