Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy
about
Public Perceptions About Sex Offenders and Community Protection PoliciesPsychopathy Checklist-Revised Use and Reporting Practices in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations.Sticks and Stones Can Break My Bones but Labels Scar My Soul.Psychological Science Can Improve Diagnostic Decisions.Stage-independent, single lead EEG sleep spindle detection using the continuous wavelet transform and local weighted smoothing.Can violent (re)offense be predicted? Review of the role of the clinician and use of actuarial tests in light of new data.Are actuarial risk data used to make determinations of sex offender risk classification? An examination of sex offenders selected for enhanced registration and notification.Threat assessment: defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence.Psychological assessment, treatment, and outcome with sex offenders.Screening Offenders: The Exploration of a Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: (YLS/CMI) Brief ScreenerEarly patterns of symptom change signal remission with interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed adolescents.Assessing and managing violence risk in outpatient settings.Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.The development and validation of the Youth Actuarial Care Needs Assessment Tool for Non-Offenders (Y-ACNAT-NO)Policy interventions designed to combat sexual violence: community notification and civil commitment.Detection of unsafety in families with parental and/or child developmental problems at the start of family support.Predicting wife assault: a critical review and implications for policy and practice.Advances in the assessment and prediction of interpersonal violence.Simultaneous evaluation of the harms and benefits of treatments in randomized clinical trials: demonstration of a new approach.SCREENING, ASSESSMENT, AND REFERRAL PRACTICES IN ADULT CORRECTIONAL SETTINGS : A National PerspectiveRisk and safety assessment in child welfare: instrument comparisons.Accepted legal applications of actuarial testing and delinquency interventions: examples of savings in real-life situations.Identification, treatment, and prevention of homicide: fallacies in research, treatment, and policy--a postscript on youth violence.Tools for the job: why relying on risk assessment tools is still a risky business.Domestic violence perpetrator programs in Europe, Part I: A survey of current practice.Classification accuracy of actuarial risk assessment instruments.Managing aggression and violence: the clinician's role in contemporary mental health care.Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change.Correcting Psychotherapists' Blindsidedness: Formal Feedback as a Means of Overcoming the Natural Limitations of Therapists.Risk factors for child maltreatment recurrence: An updated systematic review.Change trajectories for the Youth Outcome Questionnaire self-report: identifying youth at risk for treatment failure.Holistic thinking is not the whole story: alternative or adjunct approaches for increasing the accuracy of legal evaluations.Using Dynamic Risk to Enhance Conditional Release Decisions in Prisoners to Improve Their Outcomes.Research Review: Multi-informant integration in child and adolescent psychopathology diagnosis.Understanding Clinicians' Use of Cues When Assessing the Future Risk of Violence: A Clinical Judgement Analysis in the Psychiatric Setting.Impaired decoding of fear and disgust predicts utilitarian moral judgment in alcohol-dependent individuals.Evaluating risk assessments using receiver operating characteristic analysis: rationale, advantages, insights, and limitations.Another look at the (im-)precision of individual risk estimates made using actuarial risk assessment instruments.The role of warning behaviors in threat assessment: an exploration and suggested typology.The development and validation of the guidelines for stalking assessment and management.
P2860
Q28315692-7BBF1CEC-80CC-49C3-AE28-973648697EB3Q30278442-D64B09BD-2F4A-4700-8534-593D54DCF73AQ30376548-ADA8B323-4CE2-4FDB-96A7-77ED42BF9DEBQ30459682-A81D077B-DAFF-44EB-9CF0-886ED972E7E0Q30639298-E19BCFB5-F022-4E70-9B1E-CC10F9A23561Q33456057-6B9B0158-34F6-46C5-AEF0-C937553DE531Q33622223-F61111EE-FF90-43FC-B651-FEDE8892A43EQ33730310-9ECD042C-0CAB-4DE7-98F9-13DB3EA43479Q33874950-279A20B3-5405-46C0-B276-1C1613D87136Q33897417-F7EDAA71-FF3D-403E-93CB-8351ED8A76FBQ33948209-5F86E74E-B049-4826-BC01-A21D4DCEE215Q34070243-31646A0C-F70B-4192-9AE3-D7E0A5A686A2Q34683453-E611F332-AA12-44C1-BB6C-3F7415918620Q35441364-18303797-7593-497E-A2AB-FCBCDC1F86D8Q35861822-15C355E4-8545-4396-A464-4A1C82C2FBD1Q35900253-45857456-AB66-4FC8-B891-DDA02D521361Q35969320-D83898FF-FC6D-4FAE-9868-34359338D183Q35985722-85020DFF-2D9F-4561-861D-1FC8D6953F09Q36451057-64C06C1F-6490-4A8C-A77D-81DF841FA107Q36632419-A551A103-50DF-4C9D-9F7E-759D51BA2D47Q37343964-4A01B62B-3B69-409C-80DD-3E60B94839C2Q37500393-ECFE2BDF-5D4C-4FA3-A695-0009E7A1D7ABQ37500398-14907658-B501-473D-A391-F5D60417F0C7Q37954405-4C8AAEF6-7771-45AB-A5FE-979192E6E219Q38069814-3A5900D9-2922-4DC4-AC35-B6D92506FBB7Q38074374-DB1474EE-14FF-4CF5-83C3-CE495E3D39BCQ38108505-2A5C091C-8D99-4785-89C2-81182AF7420EQ38133377-C01C626D-3502-4C61-A545-3E175D2723D6Q38181033-A97C9AA2-5CBA-47DD-BC8F-47F7A9D4E20CQ38238373-343391C7-4A36-4847-A953-33C26CF39F6AQ38416859-3DFE855E-70C3-4D40-85B3-0C9704E956CBQ38522329-4F8DC8AD-6061-475E-9A0C-B28377B1B027Q38780378-68191B62-6FA5-477B-A06D-CDBB51ABBFBBQ38834408-39E318A1-FA22-4E80-BBE8-8F2C2DB83639Q39043039-2B345609-DA34-4055-BAB5-2DD99AE4302EQ39267694-F825EF3C-A8E2-415D-83B6-DFBD74E474A1Q39481328-0C6E4A16-A3C2-4A8C-8D5F-B55105007F8BQ39484783-F1C6CEA8-A37D-48BB-BC15-A3E59CC5734AQ39621562-3CD5D0BD-9FC4-455A-8700-043B5A7C5302Q39775588-294DF778-CA55-4A2E-9D5A-D4C587857946
P2860
Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy
description
article
@en
im Januar 1996 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в 1996
@uk
ലേഖനം
@ml
name
Comparative efficiency of info ...... inical-statistical controversy
@en
Comparative efficiency of info ...... inical-statistical controversy
@nl
type
label
Comparative efficiency of info ...... inical-statistical controversy
@en
Comparative efficiency of info ...... inical-statistical controversy
@nl
prefLabel
Comparative efficiency of info ...... inical-statistical controversy
@en
Comparative efficiency of info ...... inical-statistical controversy
@nl
P1476
Comparative efficiency of info ...... inical-statistical controversy
@en
P2093
Paul E. Meehl
William M. Grove
P304
P356
10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293
P577
1996-01-01T00:00:00Z