Interspecific Gene Flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo
about
Evidence for landscape-level, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bentgrass with CP4 EPSPS as a markerOrigin and evolution of cultivated cucurbitsIndirect costs of a nontarget pathogen mitigate the direct benefits of a virus-resistant transgene in wild CucurbitaLetting the gene out of the bottle: the population genetics of genetically modified crops.Specialist Osmia bees forage indiscriminately among hybridizing Balsamorhiza floral hosts.HYBRIDS AND PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS I. PATTERNS OF CHARACTER EXPRESSION IN HYBRIDS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR CLADISTIC ANALYSIS.Risk assessment of genetically engineered crops: fitness effects of virus-resistance transgenes in wild Cucurbita pepo.Population size and incidence of virus infection in free-living populations of Cucurbita pepo.EVIDENCE FOR LONG-DISTANCE POLLEN DISPERSAL IN MILKWEEDS (ASCLEPIAS EXALTATA).Microsatellite primers for studies of gene flow and mating systems in white-eyes (Zosterops).Long distance pollen-mediated gene flow at a landscape level: the weed beet as a case study.Long-distance GM pollen movement of creeping bentgrass using modeled wind trajectory analysis.Establishment of transgenic herbicide-resistant creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) in nonagronomic habitats.ATTERNS AND LEVELS OF POLLEN-MEDIATED GENE FLOW IN LATHYRUS LATIFOLIUS.Introgression of transgenic crop alleles: Its evolutionary impacts on conserving genetic diversity of crop wild relatives
P2860
Q24563831-72EA887F-9213-4F9E-9AFF-B3123B3D6962Q30047491-1F0FF95C-B6C9-43D1-9604-46550455D6FDQ34613171-1D9F76A4-3B56-4B87-948D-E7AF0D61F3BCQ36454408-3F891B15-4CA9-4EEA-91FF-C4A65419D713Q37862120-65868060-AD3B-4A5C-874D-DAB4D49B3C39Q38753576-45159EB3-4371-4A5E-B473-8FBA14DCD6ABQ39107274-2AFC5D03-832C-4E44-A38C-00F642216599Q45387986-F1CB72C9-B00D-4D09-8A64-31094BCE2D6CQ46166330-7D242DC9-7368-454D-A96D-B4C13F95DB11Q47992358-17ABD1E1-9BB2-4EF1-9E02-C3AA6DBD15D5Q51107531-E02620DF-54B5-45B5-8A00-0C05C57EF264Q51707237-CEC6E7FA-65A4-4949-BB09-281B2AE92C6CQ51719375-4F1AE8CD-E666-4EB4-9336-77C6549B679BQ53967260-0F201551-286A-4409-8F89-A62F6259FACBQ56506814-0A161228-18C1-41E1-9BDA-99F739E0BABC
P2860
Interspecific Gene Flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo
description
article
@en
im April 1988 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована у квітні 1988
@uk
ലേഖനം
@ml
name
Interspecific Gene Flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo
@en
Interspecific Gene Flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo
@nl
type
label
Interspecific Gene Flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo
@en
Interspecific Gene Flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo
@nl
prefLabel
Interspecific Gene Flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo
@en
Interspecific Gene Flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo
@nl
P356
P1476
Interspecific Gene Flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo
@en
P2093
Hugh D. Wilson
Kurt J. Kirkpatrick
P356
10.2307/2444217
P407
P577
1988-04-01T00:00:00Z