about
Ecological and evolutionary processes drive the origin and maintenance of imperfect mimicryCompetition and mimicry: the curious case of chaetae in brachiopods from the middle Cambrian Burgess ShaleComparison of natural histories and karyotypes of two closely related ant‐eating spiders,Zodarion hamatumandZ. italicum(Araneae, Zodariidae)Predator learning favours mimicry of a less-toxic model in poison frogs.The evolution of inaccurate mimics.Who resembles whom? Mimetic and coincidental look-alikes among tropical reef fishesA hypothesis to explain accuracy of wasp resemblances.From cues to signals: evolution of interspecific communication via aposematism and mimicry in a predator-prey system.Mimicry for all modalities.A 130-Year-Old Specimen Brought Back to Life: A Lost Species of Bee-Mimicking Clearwing Moth, Heterosphecia tawonoides (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae: Osminiini), Rediscovered in Peninsular Malaysia’s Primary RainforestEvidence for Batesian mimicry in a polymorphic hoverfly.Resemblance of a model species and its mimic: Response to Bury and Cichoń.Frequency-dependent variation in mimetic fidelity in an intraspecific mimicry system.Prey community structure affects how predators select for Mullerian mimicry.The effect of alternative prey on the dynamics of imperfect Batesian and Müllerian mimicries.Assassin bug uses aggressive mimicry to lure spider prey.A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry.The almost invisible league: crypsis and association between minute fishes and shrimps as a possible defence against visually hunting predatorsHoverflies are imperfect mimics of wasp colouration
P2860
Q21133556-CA2160D8-D870-4E78-A48B-D6FBEE4AA7E3Q28648033-98977701-3DE7-4C4B-9AA3-4047F97D806EQ29037822-6C458B9B-801D-40FD-B5FD-DE9DFFB4431BQ33993997-6594628F-951D-46DC-8908-F9BEA70DBC98Q34142234-44E85FE8-310A-4F5B-9716-01AF9FD31171Q34325705-7D47C33D-9915-436D-9711-9DF9D06EAD7DQ34548901-AF15D806-537E-452D-8A9C-F96A23971CF2Q35116586-B46F876D-AA2C-4C7E-BAA8-D86FB2795169Q38875443-64968AAE-10A8-4B90-81E4-6811604DC039Q46013271-1E43BE75-69D8-402B-8769-977B67E86FBBQ46948026-84D91F94-F8E1-4A30-84BA-4D91F6EA6190Q48236674-7E92E1DB-C55E-4583-A036-7C8169BAD557Q51497701-328AD0B1-424C-4FBB-A162-B7088F1256BFQ51826407-C1B99B98-69CE-42E9-BB23-ED46C312B7F6Q51993607-3514DDFE-B5CA-44B4-96C6-1E9F979C3B89Q52710638-7DDB0BE7-12F6-4F42-A9E9-1E991E5823DCQ52735625-4ACC5A5F-D21B-438B-931C-F4D8495DB5C1Q55878562-C19703AB-57F8-4AED-960E-EE2990460BD5Q59270393-0FCEA0EC-AAAA-43C2-B87A-E793E2F90076
P2860
description
im Juli 2000 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в липні 2000
@uk
name
Why are there good and poor mimics?
@en
Why are there good and poor mimics?
@nl
type
label
Why are there good and poor mimics?
@en
Why are there good and poor mimics?
@nl
prefLabel
Why are there good and poor mimics?
@en
Why are there good and poor mimics?
@nl
P2860
P1476
Why are there good and poor mimics?
@en
P2093
MALCOLM EDMUNDS
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1095-8312.2000.TB01234.X
P577
2000-07-01T00:00:00Z