about
Organization level research in scientometrics: a plea for an explicit pragmatic approachAnswer to Professor Szostak (concept theory)What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papersClassification in a social world: bias and trustReflections on classification: Thomas Reid and bibliographic descriptionClassification systems in the light of sociology of knowledgeDescribing engineering documents with faceted approaches
P2860
Q36598675-DF500B91-87CC-4604-9C76-4DD8874BC696Q55992643-8E917B1C-8974-4A2C-B046-36704A24CA10Q57195555-A37F60D9-BC80-4C5F-84B3-64CD88E89B12Q58628417-A4C35929-F0D5-43C2-A89C-7AF7B4D23173Q58628525-F2DF2C47-8B2C-4BDB-8241-AC02F01221F7Q58629790-B13644B2-D3B9-46A4-B4A4-0A03B7DC7FE7Q58631892-51AFD5EE-F48E-4129-958A-64648F41E8F7
P2860
description
im April 2008 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована у квітні 2008
@uk
name
Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak
@en
Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak
@nl
type
label
Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak
@en
Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak
@nl
prefLabel
Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak
@en
Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak
@nl
P2860
P1476
Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak
@en
P2860
P304
P356
10.1108/00220410810867560
P577
2008-04-25T00:00:00Z