Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
about
A critical review of the neuroimaging literature on synesthesiaThe N-pact factor: evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical powerHigh impact = high statistical standards? Not necessarily soLearning from our GWAS mistakes: from experimental design to scientific methodThe natural selection of bad sciencePsychDisclosure.org : Grassroots Support for Reforming Reporting Standards in Psychology.The impact of data-analysis methods on cumulative research knowledge: statistical significance testing, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis.Statistical inferences under the Null hypothesis: common mistakes and pitfalls in neuroimaging studiesMapping the emotional face. How individual face parts contribute to successful emotion recognitionAre effect sizes and confidence levels problems for or solutions to the null hypothesis test?The influence of posttreatment mutual help group participation on the friendship networks of substance abuse patients.Does intuition cause cooperation?The significance fallacy in inferential statistics."Rules" of evidence in assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments.Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature.Bayesian data analysis for newcomers.Molecular-genetic correlates of infant attachment: a cautionary tale.Methodological issues in the epidemiological study of alcohol-drug problems: sources of confusion and misunderstanding.Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?Meta-analysis at middle age: a personal history.When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment.The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable researchThe Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective.A Tutorial on Hunting Statistical Significance by Chasing N.Valuing structured professional judgment: predictive validity, decision-making, and the clinical-actuarial conflict.Correlation coefficients in medical research: from product moment correlation to the odds ratio.Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: recommendations for research and educational practice.A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0.The Failure of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing When Studying Incremental Changes, and What to Do About It.Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is better.Comment on "Ducklings imprint on the relational concept of 'same or different'".Experimental power comes from powerful theories - the real problem in null hypothesis testing.From Discovery to Justification: Outline of an Ideal Research Program in Empirical Psychology.The relation between statistical power and inference in fMRI.Functional MR images and scientific inference: reproducibility maps.Mental health concepts of evangelical Protestants.Can nursing epistemology embrace p-values?In pursuit of truth: A critical examination of meta-analyses of cognitive behavior therapy.Changes in experienced value of everyday occupations after nature-based vocational rehabilitation.Construct validity, disconfirming evidence and test-anxiety research.
P2860
Q24273356-3AA723CA-D7DF-431B-999D-212BA6910284Q24288678-9DB5E9DF-CCB7-4B54-99AB-0378935F3DDEQ24288700-C5AA579D-4204-45B7-86C2-A80D21DAF981Q24289199-986D7878-F96D-468C-A4F6-14449EC1EEC4Q27333717-4E081E4B-6603-46A6-823D-2845CF5D2640Q30488129-8CAC66A4-6F25-4F08-9EB7-9D50E5A756B8Q30570022-84C7845D-635C-4D91-AF67-2CCCF5D8EB5CQ30905479-D7EFB245-31E6-4723-81F9-FD8F0F26B493Q33664041-1CC104D9-B058-49E4-96DC-271AA635F99EQ33937331-E201C545-4FEF-4476-9838-B7F86E28120BQ34433376-708DA68C-5752-4E5E-9C5C-0058684C1930Q35163758-7B13FE3A-9EEF-42F6-A9DE-F99D93BED732Q35225769-19A163E5-0930-44FF-93DB-8944D8019BDAQ35560864-4A3A431D-E6DE-4BD2-81C5-182DEC1408EDQ36295168-FEA3E60F-D5F9-4294-85FE-17E665F9840FQ36345643-AFBD4CC8-4367-4989-BCBA-D17CA3141E16Q37734913-36279CAB-2582-4E3E-92E2-6CB01455D0D3Q37918658-D9C449F3-14C2-409D-BDB5-BD25DC7D37E1Q38546092-9E46AA9F-0024-4B7C-986B-82D8A5C84BF3Q38584062-2959E545-3A8C-43C7-88DB-076C75541A9FQ38616823-42F90B5C-AB66-42AB-8C3A-567037F3DF6AQ38683193-B98B0774-4024-4790-A3FC-4848FBC604B0Q38972920-A7D18268-94D7-4698-AB90-06717BEEF402Q39314704-8D5C5909-7B2D-476F-B56C-48FAD711A0F4Q39481301-0C15034F-960F-47DA-AF48-7E7BA61CD5B0Q40247730-D22C2B27-3C30-4DBB-80AA-4549B6888D09Q42627336-7C764163-E8CE-4F5D-8000-C503802B9C19Q42660033-1FE90448-934D-4500-B505-E55DF6F183CBQ42690805-0D177124-ADB3-475C-BE7E-B3F82397409CQ43064855-F044CE16-7495-4B68-9437-31ECFF471DB5Q44169146-3B42F1D4-AF3D-40D8-B0D5-FC1602EC4CDBQ45894595-CDE5623E-8BF3-44F3-984D-435EBF0CB878Q47100579-1925EE34-5625-40AF-9346-6E55669A3D9DQ47104480-0A18A6B3-D738-4406-B2D7-86FA6F4D098AQ47374557-43A8D469-4123-4522-A181-773C282B02BAQ47435462-A62FA9B3-988E-48D2-9598-D9781855C7CAQ47575227-9A856B14-01DA-4FCD-BCD4-FD1FE9CAA305Q50117601-20489B53-F8C2-4119-9055-84511B7E4268Q50690819-C96A5E1E-478A-4374-BAF8-868F4FCEDB36Q51320360-593B92A7-AF71-4390-AC14-D32392167F14
P2860
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
description
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в червні 1967
@uk
name
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
@en
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
@nl
type
label
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
@en
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
@nl
prefLabel
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
@en
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
@nl
P356
P1476
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
@en
P2093
Paul E. Meehl
P304
P356
10.1086/288135
P577
1967-06-01T00:00:00Z