Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
about
Women in Academic Science: A Changing LandscapeThe Science of Sex Differences in Science and MathematicsSex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence: A New Look at the Old Question.Jeopardy not bonus status for African American women in the work force: why does the myth of advantage persist?Scientific Eminence: Where Are the Women?Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies.The value of outside support for male and female politicians involved in a political sex scandal.Gender bias in leader evaluations: merging implicit theories and role congruity perspectives.The death effect in literary evaluation: reverence for the dead?Perceived gender of a pastor's name and ratings of vocational success.The effects of race, weight, and gender on evaluations of writing competence.Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy.Explaining Extremity in Evaluation of Group Members: Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Theories.A Role for the X Chromosome in Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence?Are People Prejudiced Against Women? Some Answers From Research on Attitudes, Gender Stereotypes, and Judgments of CompetenceAre Women Evaluated More Favorably Than Men?: An Analysis of Attitudes, Beliefs, and EmotionsUsing New Technology to Assess the Academic Writing Styles of Male and Female Pairs and IndividualsPerceptions of success and life satisfaction: a gender examination in Taiwan
P2860
Q28265069-7B4CEA4B-C164-446F-B13D-278801DDEBC2Q30422759-CC2AC2D8-EE87-4E23-A6EE-29914694A4F9Q34484265-AE62794D-55AE-41B0-8739-120BE6AB88EBQ38553325-84BF96F3-762C-40AF-B0C1-FFAF351811F3Q39144358-F82C9779-D35D-490B-B7C2-3F2D9C120863Q40425561-B13B93D6-96B5-4D08-84D7-A708ADC278B0Q44219790-DE0843F5-5821-483D-B683-3DCA7C720397Q44417815-271FDE2E-22A8-4CD5-9365-666875405030Q45363985-AB949BEB-E01E-4360-A257-5DDCC4BBBFACQ46333290-91C37AC2-BE0E-42F3-B04F-E8C746B262B2Q47311132-DFEED660-3662-4A18-8D2C-55C5F5FA099CQ48126410-FDC63E98-1F36-4F48-9105-FFE1D4E1D202Q50948756-57775C2A-D1ED-4366-AA11-C44C5C3BBA79Q51861376-E6CC234D-3F5A-401E-866D-B288E5CC1926Q56657361-9F8AB6AD-C231-496E-9702-A3796C62E657Q56657363-DE125B55-97C9-4051-9C31-E8F30F338574Q57252891-F8813D5B-EADB-4907-92C7-21EEF003F1E6Q58236059-E9DF2F24-4199-45F1-8504-E3CA93AF2012
P2860
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
description
article
@en
im Januar 1989 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в 1989
@uk
ലേഖനം
@ml
name
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
@en
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
@nl
type
label
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
@en
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
@nl
prefLabel
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
@en
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
@nl
P2093
P1476
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
@en
P2093
David G. Myers
Eugene Borgida
Geoffrey Maruyama
Janet Swim
P304
P356
10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409
P577
1989-01-01T00:00:00Z