about
Risk, Uncertainty and Precaution in Science: The Threshold of the Toxicological Concern Approach in Food Toxicology.The pros and cons of ecological risk assessment based on data from different levels of biological organizationSurvival data analyses in ecotoxicology: critical effect concentrations, methods and models. What should we use?The response of soil organism communities to the application of the insecticide lindane in terrestrial model ecosystems.Potential ecological and human health risks associated with the presence of pharmaceutically active compounds in the aquatic environment.Environmental risk assessment of pesticides in the River Madre de Dios, Costa Rica using PERPEST, SSD, and msPAF models.Examining predictors of chemical toxicity in freshwater fish using the random forest technique.Efforts to standardize wildlife toxicity values remain unrealized.Furthering the derivation of predictive wildlife toxicity reference values for use in soil cleanup decisions.Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment.Comment on ET&C perspectives, November 2015-A holistic view.A critical evaluation of the fish early-life stage toxicity test for engineered nanomaterials: experimental modifications and recommendations.Toxicity of formulated glyphosate (glyphos) and cosmo-flux to larval Colombian frogs 1. Laboratory acute toxicity.Evaluation of the test of significant toxicity for determining the toxicity of effluents and ambient water samples.Validation of the species sensitivity distribution in retrospective risk assessment of herbicides at the river basin scale-the Scheldt river basin case study.Misuse of null hypothesis significance testing: would estimation of positive and negative predictive values improve certainty of chemical risk assessment?Estimating population-level HC5 for copper using a species sensitivity distribution approach.Chronic Toxicity of Unweathered and Weathered Macondo Oils to Mysid Shrimp (Americamysis bahia) and Inland Silversides (Menidia beryllina).Tissue concentrations as the dose metric to assess potential toxic effects of metals in field-collected fish: Copper and cadmium.Are acute and chronic saltwater fish studies required for plant protection and biocidal product active substance risk assessment?Well past time to stop using NOELs and LOELs.
P2860
Q30388203-B59940B0-B24C-49F8-9C71-B0A52B0F41C4Q31110434-7B4AF528-4B03-4827-BB9A-A55284D05F16Q34149616-46C8143E-1D77-49F5-8D68-C46E134531F4Q34522116-F8086C54-B1B8-45FE-93EE-7142B124CCE2Q35870888-C7652331-D7E6-4A5D-8785-0DD29E7220CBQ36129717-73D84E75-47DD-4556-8520-96BC27A5DA7BQ36297139-13CF2DFD-E622-4661-A05B-3BDD7AC396C7Q38036961-16A7F684-4BE7-48C1-9836-2B6560973386Q38126481-FE8F6F85-568D-4662-A0CC-CFFE4BC34B4AQ38825204-43EF2643-3305-4B85-BA45-34606C8B622BQ38842509-D4A00D84-795A-4A68-BFA5-2145F934F855Q38869530-F594A8EA-C702-47A0-9FF8-33DA21C41D93Q38905696-893A8076-8FC2-486D-B9DE-955030A376E1Q43354785-CFE5882F-B600-44F1-AC2B-094E2BA0EBC4Q43834715-53145156-C16A-4C23-98E9-2931A91A7BBDQ44181711-E0871392-D227-4739-9E00-52599FE8A2E5Q45190375-FE4DBD5D-12FC-4354-98B0-D94B2D9131FAQ46561861-06B3D674-2374-4BD8-95F6-0A687A50CCDBQ46733936-8B1ABFE4-E11E-4710-9109-32B4BA54307CQ46965852-7601B50B-F0D8-449B-A7FA-53739E77BAE0Q51584971-E88149B6-DC8C-43E6-8540-BCA1A605B582
P2860
description
im Februar 2000 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в лютому 2000
@uk
name
What level of effect is a no observed effect?
@en
What level of effect is a no observed effect?
@nl
type
label
What level of effect is a no observed effect?
@en
What level of effect is a no observed effect?
@nl
prefLabel
What level of effect is a no observed effect?
@en
What level of effect is a no observed effect?
@nl
P356
P1476
What level of effect is a no observed effect?
@en
P2093
Mark Crane
Michael C. Newman
P304
P356
10.1002/ETC.5620190234
P577
2000-02-01T00:00:00Z