Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity
about
Conspecific plasticity and invasion: invasive populations of Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) have performance advantage over native populations only in low soil salinity.Evolutionary responses to global change: lessons from invasive species.The physiology of invasive plants in low-resource environmentsImpact of drought on plant populations of native and invasive origins.Trait values, not trait plasticity, best explain invasive species' performance in a changing environment.Plasticity in gene transcription explains the differential performance of two invasive fish speciesCommon and rare plant species respond differently to fertilisation and competition, whether they are alien or native.The relative importance for plant invasiveness of trait means, and their plasticity and integration in a multivariate framework.Testing mechanisms of N-enrichment-induced species loss in a semiarid Inner Mongolia grassland: critical thresholds and implications for long-term ecosystem responses.Norway maple displays greater seasonal growth and phenotypic plasticity to light than native sugar maple.Functional morphology underlies performance differences among invasive and non-invasive ruderal Rubus species.Evidence for shifts to faster growth strategies in the new ranges of invasive alien plants.A test for pre-adapted phenotypic plasticity in the invasive tree Acer negundo LResponses to nitrogen pulses and growth under low nitrogen availability in invasive and native tree species with differing successional status.The invasive wetland plant Alternanthera philoxeroides shows a higher tolerance to waterlogging than its native Congener Alternanthera sessilisGenetic diversity and floral width variation in introduced and native populations of a long-lived woody perennialA comparative study of physiological and morphological seedling traits associated with shade tolerance in introduced red oak (Quercus rubra) and native hardwood tree species in southwestern Germany.Can transgenerational plasticity contribute to the invasion success of annual plant species?Evolution of phenotypic plasticity in colonizing species.Plastic responses in the metabolome and functional traits of maize plants to temperature variations.Differences in developmental strategies between long-settled and invasion-front populations of the cane toad in Australia.Functional traits contributed to the superior performance of the exotic species Robinia pseudoacacia: a comparison with the native tree Sophora japonica.Plastic traits of an exotic grass contribute to its abundance but are not always favourableDoes Acacia dealbata express shade tolerance in Mediterranean forest ecosystems of South America?Nutrient foraging strategies are associated with productivity and population growth in forest shrubs.Dominance of an alien shrub Rhus typhina over a native shrub Vitex negundo var. heterophylla under variable water supply patterns.Experimental assessment of factors mediating the naturalization of a globally invasive tree on sandy coastal plains: a case study from Brazil.Predation resistance does not trade off with competitive ability in early-colonizing mosquitoes.Trade-off between early emergence and herbivore susceptibility mediates exotic success in an experimental California plant community.Jack-and-master trait responses to elevated CO2 and N: a comparison of native and introduced Phragmites australis.Timing and propagule size of invasion determine its success by a time-varying threshold of demographic regime shift.Alien plant species with a wider global distribution are better able to capitalize on increased resource availability.Comparison of growth traits between abundant and uncommon forms of a non-native vine, Dolichandra unguis-cati (Bignoniaceae) in AustraliaBeware: alien invasion. Where to next for an understanding of weed ecology?Responses of common and rare aliens and natives to nutrient availability and fluctuationsPerformance of the invasive Eupatorium catarium and Ageratum conyzoides in comparison with a common native plant under varying levels of light and moistureGrowth and photosynthetic responses of invasiveBidens frondosato light and water availability: A comparison with invasive and native congenersQuick assessment of the invasiveness of non-native plant species by using eco-physiological parameters in Tram Chim National Park, VietnamInvasive plant species are locally adapted just as frequently and at least as strongly as native plant speciesAdaptive phenotypic plasticity and competitive ability deployed under a climate change scenario may promote the invasion of Poa annua in Antarctica
P2860
Q30667224-07079673-5CD9-44FC-91FA-37304DBB8ABDQ30773718-F92FA2A1-F1B1-488D-BAEF-305D6E83B2C9Q31107584-55B37D15-A00B-4C7C-9287-989C866199F1Q31124508-4679DB71-CE4F-473C-843B-EEE8043D863BQ33354644-0B425CCA-02E2-43BA-82E7-B3E014711E20Q33792293-389D88C9-360A-4AEF-B354-AA0177101D19Q34296133-7FECFFA3-A7C9-4902-AFB0-2457A4FBC62DQ34307974-4D472A15-AB1E-4DAF-B3D1-21A2668E3A66Q34436428-97DA8712-BDFD-4192-9004-0EBB8CF8F735Q34450074-0399425A-262B-4CE8-8ABC-332B6A346C50Q34699376-971CBFE5-DAF3-4FA0-9AE7-622FF58BDCE8Q34778646-75006FF4-2E01-4124-9B26-F4503E9B9C78Q34989904-C1CBC2A7-64C4-462D-A7C4-D7AE8740DA40Q35057240-37C4C0A8-1F1E-4EA3-9F30-8D7504BB3994Q35058585-782A4628-3C84-44AE-81C9-1EDAC0091CF5Q35069663-375801DB-E2CF-4714-8AC9-8061EC367DA2Q35095018-52016F9C-F5C7-4C21-A7F0-44637496AA56Q35188226-536686EB-6A1B-4421-98ED-1A7FB9DCA59FQ35537861-073B8BF8-0488-48D8-91A4-FC5193870D1EQ35747615-194BBA06-321E-47ED-9E82-46AB0F3B4FB3Q35835655-24A76A82-9FC3-4243-84F1-9BC66F2CDA68Q35865821-0ADBE306-05BA-444A-A6BF-F36BC1516823Q35908705-234074B1-15FA-406D-B1DF-97E977759357Q36057869-2ECD26FC-28BB-4132-ABAB-FF5AD3A46907Q36259207-9CADE9AB-78BA-4141-829E-778A87938A1EQ36356504-3DC8240F-204C-4340-8931-7A372F8179DEQ37154808-8E1535AA-5208-4A2B-A067-58F053803E2BQ37521659-DD1C0822-02FF-4694-A85D-17FAD7FABBC0Q37539839-0B96808B-B3D8-4C25-855E-51F8924866C1Q41603724-CAB8A02F-956A-4E63-86A0-A3151347C958Q46837527-AE7E1DE6-706A-4CB3-874D-5DE82EBCBD97Q48030547-8DB9F514-1986-4CAC-AE34-D269C44906DDQ51146041-473F1129-C10F-43BB-9E8F-FB03D2A4D4E6Q51169596-66831A3A-CCD1-4E18-9FEE-A0CA409F9775Q56331377-FDB843BD-C97E-4AA0-8D30-DEA967DF9FE2Q56332114-29EF8904-5AB2-4F8D-981C-E604E08196E6Q56334635-EE96A161-ED00-46AD-B6D4-14D183B7F56EQ56374262-22B91E8D-602D-497B-823C-1DDF818B48FDQ56390581-E3102405-2672-4C3A-9B9A-F4B9842CE34AQ56418011-A9A59EB2-9F32-4723-A87B-D62606B2AC5A
P2860
Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity
description
article
@en
im Juli 2011 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в липні 2011
@uk
ലേഖനം
@ml
name
Multispecies comparison reveal ...... ts but not in their plasticity
@en
Multispecies comparison reveal ...... ts but not in their plasticity
@nl
type
label
Multispecies comparison reveal ...... ts but not in their plasticity
@en
Multispecies comparison reveal ...... ts but not in their plasticity
@nl
prefLabel
Multispecies comparison reveal ...... ts but not in their plasticity
@en
Multispecies comparison reveal ...... ts but not in their plasticity
@nl
P2860
P50
P1433
P1476
Multispecies comparison reveal ...... ts but not in their plasticity
@en
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1365-2435.2011.01886.X
P577
2011-07-19T00:00:00Z