Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia
about
The Prospects for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Vietnam: A Look at Three Payment Schemes.Impact of payments for environmental services and protected areas on local livelihoods and forest conservation in northern Cambodia.Interactions between human behaviour and ecological systemsReframing the concept of alternative livelihoods.A human-centered framework for innovation in conservation incentive programsLessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from forests to rangelandsEffects of payments for ecosystem services on wildlife habitat recovery.Communal Participation in Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Unpacking the Collective Decision to Enroll.Environment and Development. Get the science right when paying for nature's services.Can conservation contracts co-exist with change? Payment for ecosystem services in the context of adaptive decision-making and sustainability.Effectiveness of community forestry in Prey Long forest, Cambodia.A Multicountry Assessment of Tropical Resource Monitoring by Local CommunitiesShould payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?Experimental test of a conservation intervention for a highly threatened waterbirdHow to sell ecosystem services: a guide for designing new marketsWhy keep lions instead of livestock? Assessing wildlife tourism-based payment for ecosystem services involving herders in the Maasai Mara, KenyaNo pay, no care? A case study exploring motivations for participation in payments for ecosystem services in UgandaTowards operational payments for water ecosystem services in Tanzania: a case study from the Uluguru Mountains
P2860
Q30395382-898ED99C-DC75-41A1-B117-160D8F300E75Q35035324-27CD9591-1CF5-4853-9284-20C575DFE716Q35572315-AEECAF3C-1A11-454A-8BB8-3655B83030BAQ35756603-FE722EB2-8F7F-41BE-B299-9BDB454C195BQ36284938-DD25AF4D-37DB-4DD7-B9A6-6D24B60355DBQ36343333-142ABDF5-8947-4EE3-8A71-41EE8D5309ACQ40064615-9B389F0D-F753-42F4-ABF3-CF1B934F4110Q46408102-448D1DBF-0654-4892-9DCA-9C2E20D9DE9CQ46760405-6B50AD6B-8CE2-4D2A-A9AC-90B481CBA9EBQ46831793-F427E9C2-FAE6-4C0A-B659-9BF1FE1C0DE0Q46949517-AFA1EFA8-430A-46C6-BB0F-34D33001776DQ56554254-A80A0113-1C30-43FB-8B4F-4692E1A4E05EQ56923862-0A75FD80-EF36-4FBB-B009-089E789305E3Q56972759-905D2EFB-DEAA-4887-A664-982A92086C22Q56974406-61EDCD4B-32C9-40C7-831B-DA804E8F17D5Q57206395-C6D3F97B-374F-4402-83BD-8393FE8A349CQ57947167-EE2BF3F2-203D-41CE-8E35-A02672FC85AFQ58242199-4A211C07-0092-4A5A-B882-03591851AA9F
P2860
Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia
description
article
@en
im April 2010 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована у квітні 2010
@uk
name
Payments for biodiversity cons ...... f three programs from Cambodia
@en
Payments for biodiversity cons ...... f three programs from Cambodia
@nl
type
label
Payments for biodiversity cons ...... f three programs from Cambodia
@en
Payments for biodiversity cons ...... f three programs from Cambodia
@nl
prefLabel
Payments for biodiversity cons ...... f three programs from Cambodia
@en
Payments for biodiversity cons ...... f three programs from Cambodia
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Payments for biodiversity cons ...... f three programs from Cambodia
@en
P2093
Ashish John
Karen Nielsen
Tom Clements
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2009.11.010
P577
2010-04-01T00:00:00Z