Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
about
Test Statistics and Confidence Intervals to Establish Noninferiority between Treatments with Ordinal Categorical Data.Early embryo mortality in natural human reproduction: What the data say.The monoclonal myth.Is there diversity among UGT1A1 polymorphism in Japan?No detection of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae from Swedish patients, 1996-2013.Seroprevalence of Rift Valley fever virus in sheep and goats in Zambézia, MozambiqueInternal states drive nutrient homeostasis by modulating exploration-exploitation trade-off.A New Method of Random Environmental Walking for Assessing Behavioral Preferences for Different Lighting Applications.Seizures after single-agent overdose with pharmaceutical drugs: analysis of cases reported to a poison center.Smooth bootstrap-based confidence intervals for one binomial proportion and difference of two proportions.A comment on sample size calculations for binomial confidence intervalsComparing the characteristics of snowboarders injured in a terrain park who present to the ski patrol, the emergency department or both.A Smooth Bootstrap Procedure towards Deriving Confidence Intervals for the Relative Risk.How to report and interpret screening test properties: guidelines for driving researchers.Cultural challenges to implementation of formative assessment in Saudi Arabia: an exploratory study.Confidence Interval Estimation for Sensitivity to the Early Diseased Stage Based on Empirical Likelihood.Buprenorphine transdermal system and quality of life in opioid-experienced patients with chronic low back pain.Prediction of virologic response in difficult-to-treat chronic hepatitis C patients during high-dose interferon induction therapy.Spatial rectal dose/volume metrics predict patient-reported gastro-intestinal symptoms after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.On percentile norms in neuropsychology: proposed reporting standards and methods for quantifying the uncertainty over the percentile ranks of test scores.Prevalence of chronic ocular diseases in a genetic isolate: the Norfolk Island Eye Study (NIES).The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the construction industry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Increased airway hyperreactivity with the M40 protective mask in exercise-induced bronchospasm.Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity for combined biomarkers.Airborne concentrations of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) in North American wood mills during the manufacturing of oriented strand board (OSB).Coeliac disease in The Netherlands.Performance of Juvenile Cutthroat Trout Translocated as Embryos from Five Populations into a Common HabitatSimultaneous Confidence Intervals of Risk Differences in Stratified Paired DesignsIntroductory Statistics Textbooks and the GAISE RecommendationsSample size for estimating a binomial proportion: comparison of different methodsClosed Sequential and Multistage Inference on Binary Responses With or Without ReplacementSimple and Effective Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Differences of Proportions Result from Adding Two Successes and Two FailuresMean-Minimum Exact Confidence IntervalsA Coverage Probability Approach to Finding an Optimal Binomial Confidence ProcedureParadoxes and Improvements in Interval Estimation
P2860
Q30830451-036CFD96-CAA5-4337-945F-42DD3485D9FBQ33724337-986D6092-2A15-4A47-9E08-C3A7EF1E68E2Q33822307-186E2679-BA1E-4FCE-B74C-1CDB6D5C42A5Q36120735-1A890E3A-D251-4817-B48A-0B7E3D4F75A7Q36965933-278C0931-CE0B-45D6-85AF-2D4F63E150CEQ37067311-BC56EC32-AC00-47F3-948C-1A05A251AC6FQ37413085-0A5AA857-E995-4915-B697-018F18C78CE7Q37685892-3F26BBE3-52A3-4B07-B2A9-636784F14D2CQ38213129-97FB347E-41F8-4088-9DE3-5B45D87A913BQ38967936-A094D0D3-84AB-4B39-91D3-C03E1006DB0FQ39007201-BAF02A56-14ED-4322-B4D5-082165500668Q39123237-77E377B1-0499-4FC5-B32B-35B499973259Q39127599-90995D87-9EA8-4D14-8158-247AD2DF7120Q39284132-2B0CCFD3-8E0B-4A80-AEA3-5AD0977319A2Q41171488-B0C6D95A-F389-4800-8AF9-5A3FD46CC35DQ41213714-8EB17241-31EC-4868-8D49-4959ADB43698Q42685607-461CDE53-838A-4FAE-BEAE-A063C6991DF9Q42979490-2AF09733-E143-4C31-AAAA-2D485DA4BF67Q43365011-AE036D2B-8BB9-4A08-AB91-B252A2EC610BQ45104739-32FF9906-5E35-4FCC-9223-C83DD1DBE750Q45398387-5BFB2A47-0C4E-42F0-9FC1-2746A15F2359Q47593469-00D5B812-8529-4574-920C-D74F0D894D07Q51093866-A2F72CCC-886A-481D-BB34-FF008A27E9D3Q51226892-AC7A812A-0503-4912-80C6-CD7C12C97F2CQ51534120-3EACDB52-6550-4BEA-99C3-EFADAE8A132BQ53344284-B7013F92-AF1A-43D4-BD96-917CC59D7910Q56420578-3DFCC9F7-D551-4BE5-94EE-4CABD9B73BACQ57535720-5ED5C702-2F31-46CE-AEC1-EBD71FB56C97Q58167835-A0C8A4F9-6E40-4986-BED1-4C49B3698519Q58206327-259767C2-DF14-483A-9B86-A1910EC94AC9Q58249275-AE08D1EA-8BA8-442E-9B96-35E54E728E8CQ58264158-FE63AFA2-0D20-44D3-BC80-476A49736BD2Q58270358-4C240431-46AC-43AD-B290-55B0303C55A2Q58277175-4D8C192B-606F-4780-9333-0CD2632DC4E9Q58298164-9E2BCED6-CDBB-4679-AF4F-92A0BC9CF8E2
P2860
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
description
im Mai 1998 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в травні 1998
@uk
name
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
@en
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
@nl
type
label
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
@en
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
@nl
prefLabel
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
@en
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
@nl
P2860
P1476
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
@en
P2093
Alan Agresti
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/00031305.1998.10480550
P407
P577
1998-05-01T00:00:00Z