Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
about
Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study.The Prognostic Value of the Work Ability Index for Sickness Absence among Office Workers.Impact of a clinical decision model for febrile children at risk for serious bacterial infections at the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.Clinical prediction model to aid emergency doctors managing febrile children at risk of serious bacterial infections: diagnostic studyPerseverance time of informal caregivers for people with dementia: construct validity, responsiveness and predictive validity.Nonparametric estimation and inference for polytomous discrimination index.Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models.Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model: a multicentre external validation study.Rationalizing the management of pregnancies of unknown location: temporal and external validation of a risk prediction model on 1962 pregnancies.Managing pregnancy of unknown location based on initial serum progesterone and serial serum hCG levels: development and validation of a two-step triage protocol.Optimal linear combination of biomarkers for multi-category diagnosis.Subjective ultrasound assessment, the ADNEX model and ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy to differentiate disseminated primary ovarian cancer from metastatic non-ovarian cancer.Flawed external validation study of the ADNEX model to diagnose ovarian cancerThe Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.Validation of the Feverkidstool and procalcitonin for detecting serious bacterial infections in febrile children.External validation of ADNEX model for diagnosing ovarian cancer: evaluating performance of differentiation between tumor subgroups.
P2860
Q30428244-7FB499BA-529B-4A65-AB3B-C6031778441FQ35643511-2964D102-9B5E-4154-BD4F-716E39804D1CQ35646403-B441EED3-8F90-45A5-9F88-915DD238CEAFQ36734152-0BD195C5-54ED-4927-A335-FF367BB5DB74Q37736710-C3ADD65E-8131-4D44-9240-267BAABB4DD5Q38971533-A84F6491-4E33-4DEA-B818-17B104114B10Q39248510-F0DC5F5E-3A7C-4BFB-A806-22BBCD3001A2Q39534429-DBD8F7DA-3098-4E74-B97F-7AE1DAE54601Q40084198-A4078838-7FD7-4DF2-A139-6E2BC1E8A989Q40097963-88B91729-6C2C-4B27-A26D-F294919CD061Q40650069-09D2B3C4-A44A-4A76-88C0-700C852B7E67Q41272539-605750C0-1839-49C0-AC3C-462FF278957CQ42353314-3325BD2A-3818-453D-95CD-68862CA1A80FQ44224234-579369B1-88B6-4DC6-930E-44A9D56C32F8Q47425814-D534C416-1709-4859-9A5D-0475646E4493Q48125912-15E412E4-285E-48B0-BF80-F2700833B31E
P2860
Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
@en
Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
@nl
type
label
Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
@en
Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
@nl
prefLabel
Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
@en
Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories
@en
P2093
Caspar W N Looman
Dirk Timmerman
Vanya Van Belle
Yvonne Vergouwe
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S10654-012-9733-3
P577
2012-10-07T00:00:00Z