PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO GROUNDWATER DEPTH VARIES AMONG SPECIES AND WITH RIVER FLOW REGULATION
about
Managing artificially drained low-gradient agricultural headwaters for enhanced ecosystem functionsElevated CO₂ does not offset greater water stress predicted under climate change for native and exotic riparian plants.Incorporating climate change and exotic species into forecasts of riparian forest distribution.Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwood and willow before, during, and after two years of soil water removal.Water Relations and Foliar Isotopic Composition of Prosopis tamarugo Phil., an Endemic Tree of the Atacama Desert Growing at Three Levels of Water Table Depth.Prevalence and magnitude of groundwater use by vegetation: a global stable isotope meta-analysis.The application of ecohydrological groundwater indicators to hydrogeological conceptual models.Application of tree-ring isotopic analyses to reconstruct historical water use of riparian trees.A conditional trophic cascade: birds benefit faster growing trees with strong links between predators and plants.The effects of groundwater depth on water uptake of Populus euphratica and Tamarix ramosissima in the hyperarid region of Northwestern China.Geomorphological controls of Fraxinus excelsior growth and regeneration in floodplain forests.Physiological condition and water source use of Sonoran Desert riparian trees at the Bill Williams River, Arizona, USA.Linking stream flow and groundwater to avian habitat in a desert riparian system.Flood regime and leaf fall determine soil inorganic nitrogen dynamics in semiarid riparian forests.Co-ordination among leaf water relations and xylem vulnerability to embolism of Eucalyptus trees growing along a depth-to-groundwater gradient.Species Introductions and Their Cascading Impacts on Biotic Interactions in desert riparian ecosystems.Conserving threatened riparian ecosystems in the American West: Precipitation gradients and river networks drive genetic connectivity and diversity in a foundation riparian tree (Populus angustifolia).Long-term Water Table Monitoring of Rio Grande Riparian Ecosystems for Restoration Potential Amid Hydroclimatic Challenges.Groundwater availability mediates the ecosystem effects of an invasion ofProsopis pallidaPhreatophytes under stress: transpiration and stomatal conductance of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in a high-salinity environmentApplication of the conceptualization groundwater data model to study the Upper Arkansas River corridor, western KansasDistribution and Abundance of Saltcedar and Russian Olive in the Western United StatesECOHYDROLOGY IN A COLORADO RIVER RIPARIAN FOREST: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DECLINE OF POPULUS FREMONTIISpatio-Temporal Patterns of Water Table and Vegetation Status of a Deserted AreaREGIONAL PATTERNS OF PLANT COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO CHANGES IN WATER: OWENS VALLEY, CALIFORNIAFlooding Regime Impacts on Radiation, Evapotranspiration, and Latent Energy Fluxes over Groundwater-Dependent Riparian Cottonwood and Saltcedar Forests
P2860
Q28657999-8F826C0F-5FC1-41F9-8C6F-98771953D907Q30578165-1F0A4DA4-BDEA-4A38-94C0-235A89420E89Q30850905-6429ADC3-3D6B-4FB9-B961-520DDB356739Q33560102-04C608EF-DAB9-46CE-8A8A-5348DAFC7311Q36740216-C1FF6B23-8633-4AD2-9D41-55F7FB49D97FQ37692391-26BCE4B9-3FFF-43F0-BDE8-60B744C76778Q37965824-74161E9D-14B7-4AF9-B2A5-0E2A4FD8AFA5Q38870933-C18BC242-A2F6-4689-A4F4-0BB59FB57AF1Q38921086-F6412859-EE4D-4D70-AB7C-D999B920F203Q38942516-29FEBCE2-5AC2-43E6-86D6-305E3D8866DDQ38979251-4D9464D7-C4D2-45C4-B765-8D2DE86F31DAQ39077513-DF3DAF13-5895-465B-B1CF-E5AA60DA4E5DQ39246496-AEA60ABE-B427-4705-A37A-1CBE006D436AQ39449543-827F45C1-5D41-43DE-A084-835E28E1D50CQ39633279-755BECC3-F6B9-422C-A753-52C02A22461FQ46085819-8081E23B-2230-471E-918F-90D57515F3DFQ46325424-4A8C874D-4527-4BBD-BE5F-D06D0DDBA29FQ47850209-873304AE-0C3F-4505-AE3A-7BF0258BB90BQ56444314-2844A7C4-4B70-4F1D-81E6-B21F294AF7ADQ56480200-BB3036D4-8B9E-4A16-8B7A-A37ED5BC0CACQ56578366-DC48F8F8-D3D9-494B-9119-55E6064FD280Q56764974-3B8EDEB9-4C52-4ACA-B7E2-E573435340ECQ56783312-73BB8851-42D7-412C-B2DC-A79130179AF8Q57534402-CF49A877-9DB1-4F37-AF7A-0C06355051F8Q58109777-91DC2532-C4BB-4A97-B7C8-3556B2BF66FBQ59102828-D0F84029-8B7A-4172-97F3-472F132973E3
P2860
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO GROUNDWATER DEPTH VARIES AMONG SPECIES AND WITH RIVER FLOW REGULATION
description
article
@en
im August 2001 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в серпні 2001
@uk
name
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO GROU ...... AND WITH RIVER FLOW REGULATION
@en
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO GROU ...... AND WITH RIVER FLOW REGULATION
@nl
type
label
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO GROU ...... AND WITH RIVER FLOW REGULATION
@en
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO GROU ...... AND WITH RIVER FLOW REGULATION
@nl
prefLabel
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO GROU ...... AND WITH RIVER FLOW REGULATION
@en
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO GROU ...... AND WITH RIVER FLOW REGULATION
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO GROU ...... AND WITH RIVER FLOW REGULATION
@en
P2093
Jonathan L. Horton
Stephen C. Hart
Thomas E. Kolb
P2860
P304
P356
10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1046:PRTGDV]2.0.CO;2
P577
2001-08-01T00:00:00Z