about
« Biology/medicine 2.0 »: an overviewBibliographic Analysis of Nature Based on Twitter and Facebook Altmetrics DataCorrelation and interaction visualization of altmetric indicators extracted from scholarly social network activities: dimensions and structureResearch blogs and the discussion of scholarly informationIdentifying audiences of e-infrastructures--tools for measuring impact.A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter.What do computer scientists tweet? Analyzing the link-sharing practice on Twitter.Astrophysicists' conversational connections on TwitterHow the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citationsHow Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index.Career development tips for today's nursing academic: bibliometrics, altmetrics and social media.Performance Behavior Patterns in Author-Level Metrics: A Disciplinary Comparison of Google Scholar Citations, ResearchGate, and ImpactStoryTwitter as a tool for communication and knowledge exchange in academic medicine: A guide for skeptics and novices.Social media in public health: is it used and is it useful?Can alternative indicators overcome language biases in citation counts? A comparison of Spanish and UK researchMendeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differencesDoes research with statistics have more impact? The citation rank advantage of structural equation modelingTheoretical and technological building blocks for an innovation acceleratorFrom Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer ReviewHyperlinks embedded in twitter as a proxy for total external in-links to international university websitesSelective linking from social platforms to university websites: a case study of the Spanish academic systemTweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on TwitterHighly tweeted science articles: who tweets them? An analysis of Twitter user profile descriptionsChanging styles of informal academic communication in the age of the webExamining Characteristics of Traditional and Twitter Citation
P2860
Q26862799-4A3D180D-94DF-4B5D-8BD7-0A5BBE9248E3Q28590850-ECD12816-CAC4-4D8C-9594-83E7E33CD1C5Q28661438-8C0E85C3-A9C0-4F9B-B18C-62C80F069683Q28730020-40CD78C3-1A4F-441D-B4DC-41A786A25279Q31109178-6931E696-81AC-4F54-813B-30B1B79D6434Q33553966-FEFC7759-98C5-48CF-B595-99818D52076DQ33821795-B8D0A04B-317D-4D25-A4E3-88644B33030DQ34084040-D1ADD776-5BBD-4A45-A5FB-32726B323FB4Q34469537-CE096F29-0958-4606-9E8B-4768450895DEQ36161367-EBB45A4C-BDA1-4E00-9486-0B9B52589BE6Q36896956-A02DAE7A-3099-405A-8ACB-569EC881EC3BQ39614506-CEBC1387-E0B9-4FB5-83B3-B690870F0F12Q47090468-78813062-BE06-4664-B0FE-5A821FE02CBBQ48055716-49B85242-06D4-4CEF-AD7D-9A38C66CD6E9Q51455006-9D0C6870-A510-45CD-8E53-FD0124507E48Q56220067-245C956D-DEBD-47C7-8F27-8CEDC2E93E87Q56220068-01583538-ECBB-4E8B-A069-329F8363D540Q56220090-56A59918-CD68-4DF1-9C08-5A87171E8E47Q56510183-9564CE7A-33D5-4EEB-945A-939E8E551C30Q56854653-21D3A095-E3B4-4A75-9B85-D618C44122E7Q57659996-5488E8FC-7669-478E-9C21-AF5788C4BE86Q57660027-528D533A-D1B1-4275-9E7E-440BA43034D9Q57768393-9741C292-CA03-474E-8896-DAE49723ED72Q57782217-61C08DAF-3D84-40DC-88F2-0D501DFD4ACCQ58629457-FCADC7D4-D920-4EAE-A095-12B2A14464C9Q58643396-1545CAD1-B7B2-4CD1-B229-D8FD210293FB
P2860
description
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в листопаді 2010
@uk
name
How and why scholars cite on Twitter
@en
How and why scholars cite on Twitter
@nl
type
label
How and why scholars cite on Twitter
@en
How and why scholars cite on Twitter
@nl
prefLabel
How and why scholars cite on Twitter
@en
How and why scholars cite on Twitter
@nl
P356
P1476
How and why scholars cite on Twitter
@en
P2093
Kaitlin Light Costello
P356
10.1002/MEET.14504701201
P50
P577
2010-11-01T00:00:00Z