How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
about
A tradition in transition: factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic reviewThe impact of user fees on access to health services in low- and middle-income countriesPerformance of retail pharmacies in low- and middle-income Asian settings: a systematic reviewSystematic Review of Methods in Low-Consensus Fields: Supporting Commensuration through `Construct-Centered Methods Aggregation' in the Case of Climate Change Vulnerability ResearchWhat do people really think of generic medicines? A systematic review and critical appraisal of literature on stakeholder perceptions of generic drugsHow are treatment decisions made about artificial nutrition for individuals at risk of lacking capacity? A systematic literature reviewEating soup with nails of pig: thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature on cultural practices and beliefs influencing perinatal nutrition in low and middle income countriesHealth systems guidance appraisal--a critical interpretive synthesisExploring the influence of trust relationships on motivation in the health sector: a systematic review.Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions educationDisaster management in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review of the evidence base.Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis.Using Sandelowski and Barroso's Meta-Synthesis Method in Advancing Qualitative Evidence.Integrating Emotions Into the Critical Interpretive Synthesis.End of life care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the qualitative literature.Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups.Reviewing methodologically disparate data: a practical guide for the patient safety research field.Health professionals' views on the barriers and enablers to evidence-based practice for acute stroke care: a systematic reviewA worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents.Barriers and facilitators to evidence-use in program management: a systematic review of the literature.Managing depression in primary care: A meta-synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research from the UK to identify barriers and facilitatorsFactors associated with parental non-adoption of infant male circumcision for HIV prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.A systematic review of qualitative research on the contributory factors leading to medicine-related problems from the perspectives of adult patients with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus.Where is the evidence for emergency planning: a scoping reviewPrescriber barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications in adults: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.A qualitative evidence synthesis of employees' views of workplace smoking reduction or cessation interventions.Professionals' views of fetal monitoring during labour: a systematic review and thematic analysis.Qualitative systematic reviews of treatment burden in stroke, heart failure and diabetes - methodological challenges and solutionsThe economic burden of diabetes in India: a review of the literaturePrimary care clinicians' attitudes towards point-of-care blood testing: a systematic review of qualitative studies.Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic reviewOver-reassurance and undersupport after a 'false alarm': a systematic review of the impact on subsequent cancer symptom attribution and help seeking.A systematic review of the health and well-being benefits of biodiverse environments.Review and Synthesize Completed Research Through Systematic Review.Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews.An evidence synthesis of the international knowledge base for new care models to inform and mobilise knowledge for multispecialty community providers (MCPs).Barriers and Facilitators to Safe Food Handling among Consumers: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research StudiesHeath beliefs of UK South Asians related to lifestyle diseases: a review of qualitative literatureSearching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological reviewProcess and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review.
P2860
Q22248046-0F7501DC-E976-4778-BA13-E91D193D46B7Q24235053-9760B798-2784-49D9-BAD9-00C67B3D8117Q26766673-68E8495E-3DC6-4813-A831-AF284915C8BAQ26768417-F7B845AC-0843-492E-94D1-8D2ACAA6C6CCQ26801726-1F012DE1-513B-4613-A16C-FD45B6A5B259Q26829761-1EF6EDDF-F2AB-4F54-935D-70609D8BAF2FQ27311490-85D5A1DB-0249-4AD8-B306-65A21941785AQ28074115-8BB40ABE-7247-4970-9833-C71C2E4EE6EDQ28650432-4586B8EA-0E65-4BD0-9566-A66A00919426Q29037051-640C4072-9256-4649-8122-698D7C4123C2Q30217191-A96E1DF8-2BDA-4C6F-B868-881DC5BB4391Q30240072-4AE177C9-BF2A-48EA-9A8C-CA1D41ECC149Q30316698-2B915233-0FDD-45B7-9BDC-4CEC0F33639AQ30386617-2B536915-DDD9-4447-8265-1DC3E0CE9DA7Q30499327-9DC59FE3-836A-42DC-A583-68B60594B70FQ33251994-F59E84C7-6965-4615-BCF8-7B95ED716BC3Q33655512-EB1CBB65-1757-4BDF-B66F-9406F7900C54Q33768472-CD198791-BDF5-46E7-A30E-0BE797A87403Q33848464-8A376CEC-8330-49B9-9E10-AFD93FADA949Q33914109-572CD97E-E6E5-408E-AC7B-48D695FD234CQ33928074-E46B26F8-8862-467B-ADD6-06AA4B681971Q34018069-ADFEC0FC-3F6B-46C5-917B-29A65FCD4C95Q34219865-3BDCA8B0-8142-4AB2-A03A-1BA8699CCBE1Q34348141-5BCEAA93-C3D4-4042-B675-075F69082593Q34452703-18088296-3368-4BFA-A3C2-51B929E82086Q34465611-1446BE4C-EB26-4FCE-B031-97F5E4085F4EQ34523747-3BB47016-D6CE-4A4C-9C9B-529832638D5DQ34565245-9E1240C5-CE7A-4DBD-B2AA-C73747586E29Q34789055-E6D16FE6-E347-48EC-8A60-E152DCBFC668Q34941308-5D1133D2-5493-4561-BC73-947E94E1D15AQ35035225-325CEF34-8330-45B1-AA2C-EFA297202F57Q35065321-BA5595D4-BFA9-4915-A1FC-ACB8C6CCE506Q35111826-FEC80B99-44FD-49DE-99EC-22581F2C801CQ35595608-73E34EB2-4B1F-4909-A4E4-C0136A51E26CQ35613576-62B49E46-708C-453F-BCA1-383B6B40729CQ36157389-1D3B5A49-4E1E-4115-9C29-14715524B16AQ36210288-BB90E121-32E3-4B1E-A7FD-53FBF0E33672Q36656497-2D2BABBA-0593-4F7C-A03D-52D40FD2D8AEQ36866573-476D763D-C15B-40D0-865D-592D6ECF12C9Q36869785-14C9899B-8189-4436-BC71-86E1B00F62AC
P2860
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
description
article
@en
im Februar 2006 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в лютому 2006
@uk
name
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
@en
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
@nl
type
label
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
@en
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
@nl
prefLabel
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
@en
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
@en
P2093
Alex J. Sutton
David R. Jones
Jonathan A. Smith
Sheila Bonas
P2860
P356
10.1177/1468794106058867
P577
2006-02-01T00:00:00Z