about
Cerenkov luminescence imaging (CLI) for image-guided cancer surgeryEORTC PET response criteria are more influenced by reconstruction inconsistencies than PERCIST but both benefit from the EARL harmonization program.The maximum standardized uptake value of 18 F-FDG PET scan to determine prognosis of hormone-receptor positive metastatic breast cancerTexture analysis of (125)I-A5B7 anti-CEA antibody SPECT differentiates metastatic colorectal cancer model phenotypes and anti-vascular therapy response.Early experiences in establishing a regional quantitative imaging network for PET/CT clinical trials.Scanning linear estimation: improvements over region of interest (ROI) methods.Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Nanosolutions for a Big Challenge.EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies.Performance of cardiac cadmium-zinc-telluride gamma camera imaging in coronary artery disease: a review from the cardiovascular committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).Usefulness of standardized uptake value normalized by individual CT-based lean body mass in application of PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST).Response assessment of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent malignant glioma using [18F]Fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine PET in comparison to MRI.Patient's weight: a neglected cause of variability in SUV measurements? A survey from an EARL accredited PET centre in 513 patients.EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems.18F-FDG PET/CT heterogeneity quantification through textural features in the era of harmonisation programs: a focus on lung cancer.Diagnostic accuracy of C-11 choline and C-11 acetate for lymph node staging in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Primary lung tumor segmentation from PET-CT volumes with spatial-topological constraint.
P2860
Q28070116-0F573C03-A200-4A2D-B524-5AC5CE3CFE4FQ33740261-61C96ED7-3CC9-49EF-BDCF-7C0AC2A4443CQ34569318-2FA863E0-22AA-4DCC-A92B-002B816FCE79Q36086870-FA373044-3DE5-44EF-94D5-DB1A6F699A3FQ36303559-DD2ECA61-2E68-47F9-BF7A-D0DAA27371FBQ36731371-6098F441-8035-4A57-A605-45644D00326BQ36920672-E40CE99C-8E62-4E5F-9291-29D7156EDED1Q37422972-ECDD30A4-47CB-46BC-998F-CAC41C054D31Q37433290-2A263B1E-9890-4D77-913B-FF0C594D6CEFQ38799395-C1E3CDC8-299D-42EF-AD82-68BBCCC00DE2Q40000275-0EFDC8E0-04B8-443B-B499-0BC0730B78CDQ44461998-230D0EDF-D9AB-4E8C-B0D6-51129AB3C626Q47353613-9455101B-8084-41EE-A10C-FE8255F72B91Q47388017-A4F63156-C93F-4DF8-8616-6327D53F38DEQ48248991-9517808D-AE1C-44B8-ADC3-30CEF751572EQ48320897-9D9CCF36-8432-45A9-B4B6-F26EBADF8439Q50889439-7FF74E9C-D4E5-47FB-A1A0-18AF1947CEA1
P2860
description
article
@en
im Dezember 2011 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в грудні 2011
@uk
name
Mutatis Mutandis: Harmonize the Standard!
@en
Mutatis Mutandis: Harmonize the Standard!
@nl
type
label
Mutatis Mutandis: Harmonize the Standard!
@en
Mutatis Mutandis: Harmonize the Standard!
@nl
prefLabel
Mutatis Mutandis: Harmonize the Standard!
@en
Mutatis Mutandis: Harmonize the Standard!
@nl
P1476
Mutatis Mutandis: Harmonize the Standard!
@en
P356
10.2967/JNUMED.111.094763
P407
P577
2011-12-08T00:00:00Z