about
Continuous quality improvement: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomesFiguring out fidelity: a worked example of the methods used to identify, critique and revise the essential elements of a contextualised intervention in health policy agencies.The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation's capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policyMeasuring organizational and individual factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.Protocol for the process evaluation of a complex intervention designed to increase the use of research in health policy and program organisations (the SPIRIT study).Implementing evidence-based recommended practices for the management of patients with mild traumatic brain injuries in Australian emergency care departments: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trialDeveloping a targeted, theory-informed implementation intervention using two theoretical frameworks to address health professional and organisational factors: a case study to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency depEvidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design.The Many Organisational Factors Relevant to Planning Change in Emergency Care Departments: A Qualitative Study to Inform a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Aiming to Improve the Management of Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain InjuriesMeasuring team factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.Development and validation of SEER (Seeking, Engaging with and Evaluating Research): a measure of policymakers' capacity to engage with and use research.Evidence for a comprehensive approach to Aboriginal tobacco control to maintain the decline in smoking: an overview of reviews among Indigenous peoples.Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge.Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1-purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction.Policymakers' experience of a capacity-building intervention designed to increase their use of research: a realist process evaluation.The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy.What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers' capacity to use research? A realist scoping review.Design and formative evaluation of the Policy Liaison Initiative: a long-term knowledge translation strategy to encourage and support the use of Cochrane systematic reviews for informing health policyToward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2-risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidenceEvaluation of a targeted, theory-informed implementation intervention designed to increase uptake of emergency management recommendations regarding adult patients with mild traumatic brain injury: results of the NET cluster randomised trialParenting after a history of childhood maltreatment: A scoping review and map of evidence in the perinatal periodThe impact of oil-derived products on the behaviour and biochemistry of the eleven-armed asteroid Coscinasterias muricata (Echinodermata)Long-term effects of alcohol consumption on cognitive function: a systematic review and dose-response analysis of evidence published between 2007 and 2018Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic dataHealing The Past By Nurturing The Future: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of pregnancy, birth and early postpartum experiences and views of parents with a history of childhood maltreatmentHealing the Past by Nurturing the Future-co-designing perinatal strategies for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander parents experiencing complex trauma: framework and protocol for a community-based participatory action research studySynthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guidelineUse of GRADE in Australian clinical practice guidelines: a methodological review protocol
P50
Q24241182-9204A6A3-9C9E-49E1-A55A-B88BDABB42A6Q27301969-C36AB0B0-4553-4DC9-9303-A72B79969458Q27303852-4953BDFE-F99B-4D1A-B0BF-B8524C731B56Q30535829-F9AE92FE-AF2E-413E-84FB-1848D168CBF0Q30596833-73F7FBAC-EB10-4226-A4C3-80F955F094F5Q33938604-8812B230-9DAB-42A9-8EE4-0ADE8C7BBA26Q35655326-352CB11A-9ED6-4BC0-A4C0-2555AB917951Q35887528-B58DBD7A-0ECE-42A2-96D9-D71ACF0097A6Q35914626-2148E32C-67F4-422D-9500-102DE3A8DD4AQ36697906-6A7F1CDD-C118-46DD-8E78-F76E72849962Q37589356-FB968920-F0A9-438D-B31E-95A140DD7F4FQ38685839-E6F9C991-6787-4DD1-91AF-187584139E0DQ42355471-47166C0B-D804-44B4-8BF5-E8B105CF1F96Q45270183-60B633DE-CD3F-4A45-96DE-CA03D4338922Q47136743-22EEF89E-C71E-4109-832C-FDD62C3EB5C0Q50273423-81CF532B-1094-423A-96C6-5A002637B13DQ55020549-FA7269E7-39C0-44E6-BD0A-9338D56B46FDQ57317368-2643D629-EC85-497B-A74D-09FA708EF44BQ57473200-B96ADDC4-862E-4897-A675-A8DDBEA2CBA8Q61446914-E1FB18EC-725C-40D3-8B88-9BE2B2071227Q64099766-5554BFA4-50E2-4810-B4E8-CD6FD81A2A7FQ73232747-C4901597-2EBF-434B-9E28-585CD91DDDEBQ89699788-B275E142-5007-4663-8FA1-1D28722D48F5Q90671558-E061ED4E-6A03-45FE-97A4-D8FC7EA0B795Q91959148-CEEEA929-0D52-4D6C-9F84-3C8FEC83B87EQ92689569-8E3E3A17-97FA-47FD-94B5-2CC755A8D3EAQ92710204-51042026-5D30-4D4E-B1CD-B06423234FD0Q93140949-DD34C736-842B-4F83-8BF9-A62C6AE74C42
P50
description
onderzoeker
@nl
researcher ORCID ID = 0000-0003-1789-8809
@en
name
Sue E Brennan
@ast
Sue E Brennan
@en
Sue E Brennan
@es
Sue E Brennan
@nl
type
label
Sue E Brennan
@ast
Sue E Brennan
@en
Sue E Brennan
@es
Sue E Brennan
@nl
prefLabel
Sue E Brennan
@ast
Sue E Brennan
@en
Sue E Brennan
@es
Sue E Brennan
@nl
P106
P1153
35766406000
P31
P496
0000-0003-1789-8809