Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
about
Validity of Willingness to Pay Measures under Preference Uncertainty'Been there done that': disentangling option value effects from user heterogeneity when valuing natural resources with a use component.Estimating willingness to pay for environment conservation: a contingent valuation study of Kanas Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China.The discrete-choice willingness-to-pay question format in health economics: should we adopt environmental guidelines?An analysis of willingness to pay for community-based conservation activities at the Ghodaghodi Lake Complex, NepalEconomic valuation of flood risk exposure and reduction in a severely flood prone developing countryWillingness to Pay for a Highland Agricultural Restriction Policy to Improve Water Quality in South Korea: Correcting Anomalous Preference in Contingent Valuation MethodMaking Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across EuropeTemporal stability and transferability of models of willingness to pay for flood control and wetland conservationScope sensitivity in households' willingness to pay for maintained and improved water supplies in a developing world urban area: Investigating the influence of baseline supply quality and income distribution upon stated preferences in Mexico CityRespondent direct experience and contingent willingness to pay for new commodities: a switching endogenous interval regression analysisIncorporating zero and missing responses into CVM with open-ended bidding: willingness to pay for blue skies in BeijingChoice Consistency and Preference Stability in Test-Retests of Discrete Choice Experiment and Open-Ended Willingness to Pay Elicitation FormatsThe Effect of Risk Context on the Value of a Statistical Life: a Bayesian Meta-model
P2860
Q27312667-931CAA65-8BAC-4EA5-919B-BDE4DB738185Q51324441-3046D0DC-1461-404C-BDAA-F2D67D9D0E14Q51613853-B87956A2-7897-4BAA-97E6-AA76E3CA2200Q53913630-B469E87F-306A-43C5-9681-AD1E6FF8AAEFQ57010176-76CF7FB6-9DBB-4FFA-ACE0-27DBB2A00FFBQ57309231-7E95B060-DC6C-42BF-B258-8130BED7FEA3Q57529774-3D9328B9-7E40-4A46-998E-7FE73B64C9DBQ57922553-E0AEB5F1-6FA6-4ED6-AEF8-A7D72D5D5290Q57949584-46790BA6-53FB-483D-80FA-1F69920A71DCQ57949650-1EFDA328-9AB6-4122-9C84-081F700C6726Q58309607-5AE4A8EE-7C4D-4F51-A73A-D60573177AEFQ58392483-514768FA-5AB6-4488-BA89-CE910392C67FQ58405026-E5FBDDB1-EA50-4AC9-B8EB-D4E6E7E8C3D1Q58405181-836047E9-BA1C-4A00-9636-CE8569319B1B
P2860
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
description
im Februar 1995 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в лютому 1995
@uk
name
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
@en
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
@nl
type
label
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
@en
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
@nl
prefLabel
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
@en
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
@en
P2093
Guy D. Garrod
Ian H. Langford
Ian J. Bateman
Ken G. Willis
R.Kerry Turner
P304
P356
10.1016/0921-8009(94)00044-V
P577
1995-02-01T00:00:00Z