about
Assessing the INDCs' land use, land use change, and forest emission projectionsPeaking profiles for achieving long-term temperature targets with more likelihood at lower costsTemperature increase of 21st century mitigation scenariosParis Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C.Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goalsThe key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigationNational GHG emissions reduction pledges and 2°C: comparison of studiesAssessing the ambition of post-2020 climate targets: a comprehensive frameworkReducing global GHG emissions by replicating successful sector examples: the ‘good practice policies’ scenarioNational post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadershipCopenhagen Accord Pledges imply higher costs for staying below 2°C warmingMulti-gas emission envelopes to meet greenhouse gas concentration targets: Costs versus certainty of limiting temperature increaseMulti-model comparison of the economic and energy implications for China and India in an international climate regimeImplications of the international reduction pledges on long-term energy system changes and costs in China and IndiaEmission allowances and mitigation costs of China and India resulting from different effort-sharing approachesImplications of greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios for the main Asian regionsThe Copenhagen Accord: abatement costs and carbon prices resulting from the submissionsThe implications of carbon dioxide and methane exchange for the heavy mitigation RCP2.6 scenario under two metricsCosts, benefits and interlinkages between adaptation and mitigationEnvironmental effectiveness and economic consequences of fragmented versus universal regimesExploring the bargaining space within international climate negotiations based on political, economic and environmental considerationsA quantitative minimax regret approach to climate change: Does discounting still matter?Exploring IMAGE model scenarios that keep greenhouse gas radiative forcing below 3W/m2 in 2100Comparison of different climate regimes: the impact of broadening participationMeeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participationThe effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptationLong-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gasesAbatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimesLong-term reductions in costs of controlling regional air pollution in Europe due to climate policyLong-term, consistent scenarios of emissions, deposition, and climate change in EuropeA staged sectoral approach for climate mitigationContribution of the G20 economies to the global impact of the Paris agreement climate proposalsAre major economies on track to achieve their pledges for 2020? An assessment of domestic climate and energy policiesAnalysing the greenhouse gas emission reductions of the mitigation action plans by non-Annex I countries by 2020The effect of updated pledges and business-as-usual projections, and new agreed rules on expected global greenhouse gas emissions in 2020Predictability, equitability and adequacy of post-2012 international climate financing proposalsThe emissions gap between the Copenhagen pledges and the 2°C climate goal: Options for closing and risks that could widen the gapMethods for quantifying the benefits of sustainable development policies and measures (SD-PAMs)Differentiation of countries’ future commitments in a post-2012 climate regimeEarly action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems
P50
Q28588510-D556FC2D-A094-4EBB-B38E-D969CD62DC29Q28756672-9456850D-7ADA-46B4-AC2C-FB1DB329D6AEQ28756917-179565F1-0D7C-4C7F-842E-11F49872299CQ36064388-4B9EF24D-88CC-4A80-847B-69EF5CAE0CF2Q56867832-03C8629E-CC89-42DF-899F-1CABDAA4F5EDQ57198183-E018A6A3-3E4E-4057-A38E-0749FA86B9A0Q57265916-B09785A2-C5E7-43E7-B877-9B1409FBE6ABQ57719834-75C0652D-D7CE-4A6B-AD97-B91FD6BBBF99Q57719841-1A744632-F94A-42B8-AB18-5E7ABC9B5C32Q58058189-FE9E7BF5-6432-4081-9F12-78279C4A98CFQ58058199-37063F14-392F-496D-88EF-8A8045F1AC8CQ58058240-FD7AFA81-4818-42EC-B28F-7C6577816ABDQ58082374-4D665AE6-E838-4E22-B36E-7989933A423FQ58082400-E84CF114-2FE1-46B4-BBA7-FABD0D605ED4Q58082418-863A14C8-A0D5-4F0D-A0B7-B837F74D178DQ58082424-9C3235F3-561A-43A7-AAE1-B2CDDC252A25Q58082455-6F3F462A-F534-47D0-833B-AA34D4E1DA85Q58094940-5711823A-81B3-4040-8A88-28BA18A3BD8AQ58094970-F58C325D-6949-4BC5-B9EB-6CB4EC7DE844Q58094980-D2748DB2-A722-4B7B-BE96-5BE8DC2FE518Q58095085-B83506F9-4DF2-431A-B834-83258B3A8817Q58095112-CBA00330-17A3-48C0-9B17-7BAB5853A324Q58095134-9C8AFCF2-14C2-4E9B-B26F-D54BFB536CB3Q58095170-B232D65E-4349-43C4-B10E-62E1B23085D6Q58095194-3F44B3A7-C23F-4B88-B6AF-DA363E84C4AFQ58095201-6669CC4D-2A2F-48DE-99BC-E7145FD84AE1Q58095225-EAF14DC9-B591-4258-8C58-F627E69DC860Q58095256-DA814ADF-33EB-4B9A-89C0-D3DB97E7BF48Q58095298-207F716B-224A-405A-A5B0-CED680D49B54Q58095303-43693E92-972D-4527-BD2E-CC54668CDD7FQ58098289-0A469A94-4001-4B90-A414-40701FE8AACEQ58244442-59E6A00D-EFF0-4CCF-914D-F7C07A1DA43DQ58244467-7867BD94-C82C-4723-953A-16907965585AQ58244473-D610C7A2-1D31-49DB-B188-411514A7353CQ58244479-1B9610FE-020C-42F6-B0CF-B6F4F0A09439Q58244488-66A27AA4-91C8-46E9-8193-B51088925446Q58244493-9F1F41CA-AACB-49A8-BF6D-2F9E1348799CQ58268685-95067AEA-2DF6-495C-BEB5-3304E01EFC4AQ58268692-65059733-E191-48C9-8E5F-4F3D8AE84A22Q58308980-6F5F276E-2FAE-4F6D-882A-2B734675C93F
P50
description
researcher, ORCID id # 0000-0002-5128-8150
@en
wetenschapper
@nl
name
Michel den Elzen
@ast
Michel den Elzen
@en
Michel den Elzen
@es
Michel den Elzen
@nl
type
label
Michel den Elzen
@ast
Michel den Elzen
@en
Michel den Elzen
@es
Michel den Elzen
@nl
prefLabel
Michel den Elzen
@ast
Michel den Elzen
@en
Michel den Elzen
@es
Michel den Elzen
@nl
P1006
P214
P1006
P106
P1153
6602757925
P21
P214
P31
P496
0000-0002-5128-8150
P735
P7859
viaf-281492979