Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
about
Maximizing health literacy and client recall in a developing context: speech-language therapist and client perspectives.Comparison of the South African Spondaic and CID W-1 wordlists for measuring speech recognition threshold.Stroke Research Staff's Experiences of Seeking Consent from People with Communication Difficulties: Results of a National Online Survey.Initial evaluation of the Consent Support Tool: a structured procedure to facilitate the inclusion and engagement of people with aphasia in the informed consent processAddressing the long-term impacts of aphasia: how far does the Conversation Partner Programme go?Qualitative research in aphasia: A review of the literatureSelf-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression in chronic stroke patients with and without aphasia
P2860
Q37928738-74A657D9-3AC2-4086-98D0-A13BF032DB06Q38405332-6F587859-82B4-49F0-9E02-0AAF0FE5615CQ44580307-46C66732-05B3-4032-8765-9D327078BEA8Q56770663-498EFF9B-3527-4959-BB13-CD3DF3064695Q57274638-0EF07A60-707D-499D-A038-0315C77EB6C5Q58252294-0161003D-63BD-49B8-937F-6675E28DF556Q58306518-6E507D31-B392-4078-AA45-FEEAFC6BD4BF
P2860
Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
description
article
@en
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в листопаді 2008
@uk
name
Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
@en
Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
@nl
type
label
Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
@en
Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
@nl
prefLabel
Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
@en
Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
@en
P2093
Claire Penn
Jennifer Watermeyer
Madeleine Müller
Tali Frankel
P2860
P356
10.1080/02687030701521786
P577
2008-11-28T00:00:00Z