Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
about
Multi-country willingness to pay study on road-traffic environmental health effects: are people willing and able to provide a number?Threatened bird valuation in AustraliaUsing the stated preference technique for eliciting valuations: the role of the payment vehicle.Impact of perceived importance of ecosystem services and stated financial constraints on willingness to pay for riparian meadow restoration in Flanders (Belgium).Are children rational decision makers when they are asked to value their own health? A contingent valuation study conducted with children and their parents.Replacing rubber plantations by rain forest in Southwest China--who would gain and how much?Elicitation of ostomy pouch preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea – a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal statesWho Wants More Open Space? Study of Willingness to Be Taxed to Preserve Open Space in an Urban EnvironmentÉthique et évaluation monétaire de l'environnement : la nature est-elle soluble dans l’utilité ?A Meta-study Investigating the Sources of Protest Behaviour in Stated Preference SurveysProtester or non-protester: a binary state? On the use (and non-use) of latent class models to analyse protesting in economic valuation*A mixed approach to payment certainty calibration in discrete choice welfare estimationThe potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costsNonmarket valuation of water quality in a rural transition economy in Turkey applying an a posteriori bid design
P2860
Q33647325-3B32B05D-3B2E-46FE-B904-01BDF3003722Q33793568-A85C23C9-5BB4-42B5-A84E-419DAD8E8C13Q38134667-3D953FD8-4485-47F0-A099-74C68D02FFA1Q39189816-6E9B6614-C941-4A3D-8E00-3228BD86D2BBQ40044018-16E1CA22-462E-4951-A808-A91D69BFFB53Q46784540-F1B831AE-91CB-46A2-ABFE-FBB017ED2D77Q48628490-4CD5A958-695D-4308-B1BA-86A8D4554CFAQ57047615-468E1BF6-7DB0-4B1D-A5C4-52F8CE27913DQ57428043-6B6590E9-2C2E-41D0-BE99-ED979CED450DQ58154685-35FA104B-53DE-434E-9FCC-20FEB736AD3FQ58358814-C6809EF3-4CC7-40BC-BD0F-3C21BB463E7BQ58358870-D58B4744-816E-4FF6-8950-E12BB9743932Q58405166-0A8E435C-DDC7-40A3-8938-AAC83852BD5AQ58405208-3132E0B9-242C-4141-8175-5AC2B3DD37D0Q58405211-3D7D4870-6B3C-4442-A16E-73514C932065
P2860
Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
description
im Juni 2006 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в червні 2006
@uk
name
Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
@en
Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
@nl
type
label
Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
@en
Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
@nl
prefLabel
Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
@en
Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
@nl
P1433
P1476
Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
@en
P2093
Jürgen Meyerhoff
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2005.04.021
P577
2006-06-01T00:00:00Z