A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58618365

about

Diet, supplement use, and prostate cancer risk: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial Marine fatty acid intake is associated with breast cancer prognosis Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire Diet and breast cancer: a systematic review.A toolkit for measurement error correction, with a focus on nutritional epidemiology Allowing for never and episodic consumers when correcting for error in food record measurements of dietary intake Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers A carotenoid health index based on plasma carotenoids and health outcomes Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology.An examination of clinical differences between carriers and non-carriers of chromosome 8q24 risk alleles in a New Zealand Caucasian population with prostate cancer.Dietary intake of specific fatty acids and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women in the VITAL cohort.Hazard ratio estimation for biomarker-calibrated dietary exposures.The role of dietary measurement error in investigating the hypothesized link between dietary fat intake and breast cancer--a story with twists and turns.Binary regression in truncated samples, with application to comparing dietary instruments in a large prospective study Regression calibration in nutritional epidemiology: example of fat density and total energy in relationship to postmenopausal breast cancer.Physical activity's impact on the association of fat and fiber intake with survival after breast cancer.Summary and meta-analysis of prospective studies of animal fat intake and breast cancer.Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of diabetes-related cancers: a meta-analysis.Food sources of fat and sex hormone receptor status of invasive breast tumors in women of the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort.Identification of Urinary Polyphenol Metabolite Patterns Associated with Polyphenol-Rich Food Intake in Adults from Four European Countries.Dietary total fat and fatty acids intake, serum fatty acids and risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Dietary intake of saturated fat is not associated with risk of coronary events or mortality in patients with established coronary artery disease.Dietary assessment and the reliability of nutritional epidemiology research reports.Dietary fiber and colorectal cancer risk: a nested case-control study using food diaries.High corn oil and extra virgin olive oil diets and experimental mammary carcinogenesis: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical p21Ha-Ras expression study.Estimating the alcohol-breast cancer association: a comparison of diet diaries, FFQs and combined measurements.Identification of a dietary pattern characterized by high-fat food choices associated with increased risk of breast cancer: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study.Associations between dietary methods and biomarkers, and between fruits and vegetables and risk of ischaemic heart disease, in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort Study.Diet quality and mortality: a population-based prospective study of men.Self-reported energy intake by FFQ compared with actual energy intake to maintain body weight in 516 adults.Concurrent and construct validity of Mediterranean diet scores as assessed by an FFQ.Fibre intake in relation to serum total cholesterol levels and CHD risk: a comparison of dietary assessment methods Dietary pattern predicts breast cancer risk – evidence from the EPIC-Potsdam study

P2860

Q24594183-D5DA265F-2E02-4C2E-A546-6A6C3D6EB65E Q24597210-F9314E8E-76AB-4AC3-A51A-19675299DE1E Q33760947-6B2D48C8-B8F1-4C75-A07C-D2400AD62997 Q34437348-6FD78D89-BA36-41E8-BCEB-92839CBDAC94 Q34844738-2A7B029B-439D-4508-9AA5-92646561BC7B Q35204348-E915E9F9-8C07-4A34-AE21-24541BC6F4D7 Q35450577-5D1E6CDD-F1F7-49E8-A86F-FDA846DF943B Q35678566-82031821-80C7-4025-8CCE-4DA01597B65A Q35734348-0A5977FC-4319-4DF3-8EDC-05FC9951C702 Q36663319-D5DD963F-49E8-40F4-B87A-892B4548490D Q36787916-59B8BEE2-F959-476A-9B66-1D4E78B5047A Q36828541-9D7D327C-C425-4EB0-A234-AAAE9E774F34 Q37052743-C6F28FFF-1C83-4B30-86D8-91C57B81CB71 Q37272937-70D2AF92-03AF-4383-ABFD-7E070C226F3A Q37348610-50DAA403-4506-4CB1-BB96-D443FEB164B3 Q37432391-C2CCBCC9-D57F-4828-BC67-F64DD260EFAD Q37697928-BF7D72E8-3604-4DBF-A12C-FB3A11874269 Q38061213-B4A6800F-CFAB-4B70-A2B2-62D83B6E86EE Q39991338-840E51DB-7C19-4017-813E-6E72A872355B Q40102054-27F7B55F-5519-4987-8E00-E389AC66668F Q41106113-7A79D0AE-28C2-4D30-9040-270D6E238F91 Q41491205-3F763710-CB41-41A9-B664-D5BB300C907C Q42793280-00E7B8DB-3744-46D8-868B-1EA3D7BE9CCE Q43091514-07BFDC76-21DE-43B6-91B8-8E070FCD360B Q43502076-40E06E85-D58B-4364-941F-F35B12BBF159 Q43984921-FCCFB8FD-5857-4424-AE3A-01A8CDCEA38B Q44116713-B5F17C02-A4FF-43D4-902A-61BF0DA2B098 Q44605860-B20B1B4F-3D16-4AFF-A3A7-DCE365025D51 Q46866089-1B16CD84-BDDA-4EB3-A322-36FB5BD28D51 Q47390013-40003A8F-2962-4055-A2E1-E07C61C53595 Q50794901-84943CA5-EF90-4FCC-A68F-2F1C42457FE1 Q57202644-D8FA8BF3-AFE3-4012-AFCC-B628D6B8F14C Q57744747-7C366580-9A96-4714-9936-36C98DB35FAD

P2860

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58618365

description

im Mai 2006 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel

@de

scientific article published on 03 May 2006

@en

wetenschappelijk artikel

@nl

наукова стаття, опублікована в травні 2006

@uk

name

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship

@en

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship

@nl

type

label

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship

@en

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship

@nl

prefLabel

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship

@en

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat–breast cancer relationship

@nl

P1433

Q58618365-BD9D2CDD-5405-47A3-993B-015BA47E1E5D

P1476

Q58618365-97B742E8-C9FB-4531-BCAD-45D79CEEC718

P2093

Q58618365-219330D5-99E9-4049-92FF-6DC50EEC730B

Q58618365-62154081-3D78-4054-A0BE-811708B266DA

Q58618365-ACC93498-9C9F-4979-BEB3-DC61CE7D7CF8

Q58618365-BC3DD80B-19CA-4CBA-A771-678CBA0E8862

Q58618365-BC66400C-94EC-44AF-B4ED-9758FD199766

Q58618365-EC40C7D7-C434-4C00-96EA-91D4B4A85D45

Q58618365-F10A00A2-4876-46AC-B2AB-96FDA9ACCC8C

Q58618365-F3DE2451-CDFB-42AA-9749-F3255F244F7D

Q58618365-F6B709AF-69F1-4A91-8BE0-5C5446CA2225

Q58618365-F9C1AD3A-0FB3-41DA-8031-7FBD37E0E51E

P2860

Q58618365-01418102-C5AF-4894-9DDA-C8DC63F87AD5

Q58618365-0EF3EE36-2F59-42E9-9B67-B51C34569927

Q58618365-1AC23AE2-AC08-49E8-9F5A-AEC8ED079772

Q58618365-1CB64FD6-E2B5-4424-92AF-45B224625002

Q58618365-2E3BB6C7-8B22-4494-B358-56ED27FB4CE5

Q58618365-33917044-955D-4309-87A2-986A425AD6A0

Q58618365-388B5A9D-0B46-4566-BDE3-91E733E44C80

Q58618365-3B4FB6A0-61DB-43E5-A34D-41DA5F28AB11

Q58618365-3CB754DB-4D79-4049-A5C4-7EBE647B7C91

Q58618365-3DBDF448-70CD-4408-A7F3-BB6F310486E4

P304

Q58618365-20D221D1-163C-47D3-824F-3124CBAF9C0C

P31

Q58618365-B2C43B64-D207-4B9E-BD5E-E1BFD0811AB1

P356

Q58618365-F3B27C44-B07D-4834-9284-9FB8392FFFAD

P433

Q58618365-AA46D178-50FE-4E07-95F2-4ECF8F05B401

P478

Q58618365-45F37B0F-344C-4786-B9A2-53EBD2B33748

P50

Q58618365-00856EED-597A-49C6-B10B-82B6FD788A56

P577

Q58618365-42B2BCE7-55C5-467C-B0D4-2384754177E9

P698

Q58618365-0C073650-EC1F-4F82-90FB-2D480296B7F4

P356

P1433

International Journal of Epidemiology

P1476

A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat-breast cancer relationship

@en

P2093

Amy F Subar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Arthur Schatzkin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Douglas Midthune

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Frances E Thompson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Laurence S Freedman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nancy Potischman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Raymond Carroll

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ross Prentice

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ruth Patterson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Victor Kipnis

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Dietary fat and breast cancer risk revisited: a meta-analysis of the published literature

Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of invasive breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial

Commentary: Dietary diaries versus food frequency questionnaires-a case of undigestible data.

Dietary factors and risk of breast cancer: combined analysis of 12 case-control studies.

Feasibility of a randomized trial of a low-fat diet for the prevention of breast cancer: dietary compliance in the Women's Health Trial Vanguard Study.

The Women's Health Initiative recruitment methods and results.

Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles.

Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.

Dietary sources of nutrients among US adults, 1994 to 1996.

Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology.

P304

1011-1021

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1093/IJE/DYL085

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

35

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Richard P. Troiano

P577

2006-05-03T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

16672309

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string