The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study

about

The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q58770735

description

article

@en

im August 2018 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel

@de

wetenschappelijk artikel

@nl

наукова стаття, опублікована в серпні 2018

@uk

name

The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study

@en

The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study

@nl

type

Item

label

The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study

@en

The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study

@nl

prefLabel

The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study

@en

The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study

@nl

P1476

The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study

@en

P2093

Elie A Akl

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Fadi El-Jardali

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Joseph R Habib

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lama Bou-Karroum

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Maram B Hakoum

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mounir Al-Gibbawi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

Why the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Should Include Funding Source as a Standard Item

Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor

Developing and refining the methods for a 'one-stop shop' for research evidence about health systems

Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions.

Association between funding source, methodological quality and research outcomes in randomized controlled trials of synbiotics, probiotics and prebiotics added to infant formula: a systematic review.

A Systematic Review of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: Part 2. Funding Source, Conflict of Interest, and Sample Size in Plastic Surgery.

A randomized study of how physicians interpret research funding disclosures.

Funding source and the quality of reports of chronic wounds trials: 2004 to 2011.

Disclosure of funding sources and conflicts of interest in phase III surgical trials: survey of ten general surgery journals.

P2888

s12961-018-0356-3

P304

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/S12961-018-0356-3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Assem M. Khamis

P577

2018-08-17T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1106156041

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

30119673

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

health policy

P932

6098580

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string