about
Relevant Beyond the Roman Period: Approaches to the Investigation, Analysis and Dissemination of Archaeological Investigations of the Rural Settlements and Landscapes of Roman BritainiTrench: A study of user reactions to the use of information technology in field archaeologyPost-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflective and radical practiceTowards a post-colonial artefact analysisAssembling archaeological pedagogy. A theoretical framework for valuing pedagogy in archaeological interpretation and practiceArchaeology after interpretation. Returning humanity to archaeological theorySupply, demand and a failure of understanding: addressing the culture clash between archaeologists' expectations for training and employment in ‘academia’ versus ‘practice’On the Outside Looking in: What Will Brexit Mean for European Archaeology?Food surplus and archaeological proxies: a case study from Roman CreteDestruction and the Rhetoric of ExcavationArtefactual Persons: The Relational Capacities of Persons and Things in the Practice of ExcavationBreaking through the language barrier – bringing ‘dead’ languages to life through sensory and narrative engagementSocial Practice, Method, and Some Problems of Field ArchaeologyBook reviews. John Lewis et al. Landscape Evolution in the Middle Thames Valley: Heathrow Terminal 5 Excavations Volume 1, Perry Oaks (Framework Archaeology Monograph 1). xii+250 pages, 122 b&w & colour figures, 56 colour plates, 30 tables, CD-ROM. 2Heathrow Terminal 5 Excavation Archive (Data Paper)Bridging the Two Cultures – Commercial Archaeology and the Study of Prehistoric BritainArchaeological Survey Design, Units of Observation, and the Characterization of Regional VariabilityEXCAVATING THE ROMAN PEASANT I: EXCAVATIONS AT PIEVINA (GR)Seeing ThingsAlienation and Redemption: The Praxis of (Roman) Archaeology in BritainEngagement and Management: Developing a Monitoring System for Open-air Rock Art in the UK and IrelandRe-excavation, Reflexivity and Responsibility at Colonial WilliamsburgOn Disciplinary Culture: Archaeology as Fieldwork and Its Gendered AssociationsGrey Literature, Academic Engagement, and Preservation by UnderstandingLegal and Administrative FrameworksOften Fun, Usually Messy: Fieldwork, Recording and Higher Orders of ThingsCommentaryField Schools, Transferable Skills and Enhancing EmployabilityKnowledge, Value and the Celtic TigerArchaeology and Capitalism: Successful Relationship or Economic and Ethical Alienation?‘Late Antique Field Archaeology’: A Legitimate Aim?Wet-Site Excavation and Field Methodology at Butrint, Albania: The Roman Forum Excavations ProjectEpilogueArchaeological FieldworkParadigm and pragmatism: GIS‐based spatial analyses of Roman infrastructure networks and land‐use concepts in the Upper Rhine ValleyIt’s Not Mitigation! Policy and Practice in Development-Led Archaeology in EnglandRecording Loss: film as method and the spirit of Orford Ness
P2860
Q47487639-ec464f5f-4355-4eb5-37a6-8427b4a978feQ57195614-8024d6f7-4f38-d731-266d-7b147c005f7fQ57627458-c82cbd24-40d8-bdba-b2bb-f388fbe7dcebQ57627851-34495fd1-4126-9755-3916-79bee8c5801aQ57627911-a3f53429-4f17-d189-0460-e25a93d77937Q57627994-7ae02943-4529-4d2c-047d-09f7bc847283Q57667704-82688363-4436-6c7f-7a00-3d61cfc2170bQ57684565-FACC7EA6-4069-41D3-AE28-0323882C3E11Q57753734-273283D3-6CFA-4244-AF82-E403C343DEE1Q58514949-0d3c4d74-4eb4-6db2-114d-d57bb7e31625Q58531465-3b40c61f-4cb4-b8be-5fee-2829f308ea5eQ58686919-0a307641-47b7-b3ad-e776-4b4182a55ed6Q58715597-C9CA1EA1-1691-4163-BF78-E0530FB8E4F6Q59104611-4642f3e4-47c6-b280-83c7-1a361912910bQ59150800-4d2e91bf-4000-4648-d1f4-3096e06a6d17Q59184687-753c2b08-4912-a63c-6c27-51b4daab207cQ59236571-e6c00701-47f3-3c8b-9789-0c0ec054c9ceQ59396546-4ab6a39e-46b9-dfe6-10c6-4be2a4cb8cbbQ64592495-27d34c03-4871-c7ef-2d04-eadc908d2fe5Q72176146-239082ee-4198-aeb1-29fe-19481b24b73fQ85945086-2414282f-455c-99d1-b4d3-57ec43a231beQ92567911-1F3D21FB-DCB5-4056-A6DC-5FFB56400289Q92567912-6E56F3AE-F1B0-4CC6-8461-7B532287119DQ92567913-158AC928-DE04-49E9-8E7C-119608C77023Q92567915-0267C2B5-54F0-4F5D-8718-66B387EECAA1Q92567917-26D0484C-ABA2-4F64-8276-E3F16E099735Q92567918-B91863E0-32ED-426D-984A-E5ABCFB779E9Q92567920-B2307117-4986-40EF-856D-8DE143F2C4E2Q92567925-9431A86B-6223-4767-A151-8AEB976AA887Q92567931-89866F63-00EC-40FE-A0C5-5F3AA8FFD0C4Q92567938-107C0530-D175-48A7-8496-97928924F521Q92567943-83E1C1E5-9305-4BF9-BF76-F97BFFE887E2Q92567950-FA7A4F2A-29A3-439B-AE98-1F2B61BDAB40Q92567956-A988D474-AE76-4715-8FA4-ACA5C341B72AQ92567961-DDE1855B-48DE-448C-9432-75B97119DE54Q92567968-754AA5CF-5174-4F76-964B-40399ED54831Q92567974-D0A51774-E9F5-4397-BA90-332E5E121D85
P2860
description
article
@en
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована у вересні 2000
@uk
name
Interpretation not record: the practice of archaeology
@en
Interpretation not record: the practice of archaeology
@nl
type
label
Interpretation not record: the practice of archaeology
@en
Interpretation not record: the practice of archaeology
@nl
prefLabel
Interpretation not record: the practice of archaeology
@en
Interpretation not record: the practice of archaeology
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
Interpretation not record: the practice of archaeology
@en
P2093
Gill Andrews
John S. C. Lewis
P2860
P304
P356
10.1017/S0003598X00059871
P407
P577
2000-09-01T00:00:00Z