Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid
about
Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid
description
article
@en
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в березні 2007
@uk
name
Peer review process: Assessmen ...... flated, unreliable and invalid
@en
Peer review process: Assessmen ...... flated, unreliable and invalid
@nl
type
label
Peer review process: Assessmen ...... flated, unreliable and invalid
@en
Peer review process: Assessmen ...... flated, unreliable and invalid
@nl
prefLabel
Peer review process: Assessmen ...... flated, unreliable and invalid
@en
Peer review process: Assessmen ...... flated, unreliable and invalid
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Peer review process: Assessmen ...... flated, unreliable and invalid
@en
P2093
HERBERT W. MARSH
NIGEL W. BOND
UPALI W. JAYASINGHE
P2860
P356
10.1080/00050060600823275
P577
2007-03-01T00:00:00Z