about
Only Behavioral But Not Self-Report Measures of Speech Perception Correlate with Cognitive Abilities.Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence.How Does Auditory Training Work? Joined-Up Thinking and Listening.Benefits of phoneme discrimination training in a randomized controlled trial of 50- to 74-year-olds with mild hearing lossThe relationship of speech intelligibility with hearing sensitivity, cognition, and perceived hearing difficulties varies for different speech perception tests.Working memory training for adult hearing aid users: study protocol for a double-blind randomized active controlled trialAuditory training can improve working memory, attention, and communication in adverse conditions for adults with hearing loss.Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation is associated with computer-based auditory training uptake, engagement, and adherence for people with hearing loss.Computer skills and internet use in adults aged 50-74 years: influence of hearing difficulties.Computer and Internet Interventions to Optimize Listening and Learning for People With Hearing Loss: Accessibility, Use, and Adherence.Understanding the psychosocial experiences of adults with mild-moderate hearing loss: An application of Leventhal's self-regulatory model.Erratum: How does Auditory Training Work? Joined up Thinking and ListeningThe development of a measure of participation in adults with hearing loss: a qualitative study of expert views.The Association Between Cognitive Performance and Speech-in-Noise Perception for Adult Listeners: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Applying theories of health behaviour and change to hearing health research: Time for a new approach.Research priorities for mild-to-moderate hearing loss in adults.Application of health behaviour theory to hearing healthcare research: The state of play and beyond.Association between subjective tinnitus and cognitive performance: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysisAuditory and Cognitive Training for Cognition in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisIdentifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting PartnershipEvidence-Based Interventions for Adult Aural Rehabilitation: That Was Then, This Is NowApplications of qualitative grounded theory methodology to investigate hearing loss: protocol for a qualitative systematic review
P50
Q27304798-891A555B-D918-4587-B7C7-DBB4699CD3B6Q28487933-E5C30951-27C0-45F7-8E71-70EF7CF097A9Q30371295-1F836434-5414-4095-BF46-33160074E652Q30435962-797088D7-9F7A-4B52-8F35-285567E133EEQ30654442-2F8680F8-FEDF-4D91-BBF7-5F1ACA6ACD5AQ34530295-64735BE2-C890-492C-ACF5-2FA34DDCEA24Q35659399-AEECCD41-15BE-45EF-BEB3-AA66BFE2C407Q35921915-A8551513-50D0-4E35-85F4-E8D3957AB2D9Q36435564-7AB28B20-8F07-43C3-9BD8-D0D0A8A04476Q38933926-7D919307-A8C4-4053-BB09-C4EDD6311E32Q40120352-91BAF7C3-FDAE-4DF7-89A6-0797F963A1AAQ41842366-18B855C7-A2F0-4241-988D-F3B1416DDF70Q46173066-1C966DCF-8A93-45F7-8461-8B060EBE7562Q47103383-9AB6717D-641C-40BD-B6CB-806D64691D99Q50213971-8E723C0D-1D0F-4446-9651-CE4E83A8B1A4Q50317455-70471702-603C-4C83-836A-5E7470C84EACQ50349003-6D051E74-FC8C-4863-ABF4-1542E86DD17CQ58786090-0A00B348-E88A-4059-A572-230F7A5FE504Q58790682-072F2D71-4CBA-4D6D-BB2E-A4562205B73DQ91384961-9D4FFF71-B1C4-429B-90B9-1D203FD1969BQ91388129-99EB42B3-D1AD-4B99-9700-13523FD440ECQ91968525-1DBE250D-DD75-4EA2-ABBB-3E1921526C40
P50
description
onderzoeker
@nl
researcher ORCID ID = 0000-0002-0547-4403
@en
name
Helen Henshaw
@ast
Helen Henshaw
@en
Helen Henshaw
@es
Helen Henshaw
@nl
type
label
Helen Henshaw
@ast
Helen Henshaw
@en
Helen Henshaw
@es
Helen Henshaw
@nl
prefLabel
Helen Henshaw
@ast
Helen Henshaw
@en
Helen Henshaw
@es
Helen Henshaw
@nl
P106
P1153
36632195100
P31
P496
0000-0002-0547-4403