about
The Evaluation Scale: Exploring Decisions About Societal Impact in Peer Review Panels.Relative Values: Perspectives on a Neuroimaging Technology From Above and Within the Ethical LandscapeUK science press officers, professional vision and the generation of expectations.Healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach."The Danger of Lurking": Different Conceptualizations of "User Awareness" in Social Media Research.The UK's 100,000 Genomes Project: manifesting policymakers' expectations.Genomics England's implementation of its public engagement strategy: Blurred boundaries between engagement for the United Kingdom's 100,000 Genomes project and the need for public support.From "a Fair Game" to "a Form of Covert Research": Research Ethics Committee Members' Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research.Public trust and 'ethics review' as a commodity: the case of Genomics England Limited and the UK's 100,000 genomes project.Towards a national genomics medicine service: the challenges facing clinical-research hybrid practices and the case of the 100 000 genomes project.Knowledge, beliefs, and decisions of pregnant Australian women concerning donation and storage of umbilical cord blood: a population-based survey.Perspectives on Achieving Institutional Trust in Personalized MedicineIs It Time to Re-Evaluate the Ethics Governance of Social Media Research?The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research DataCivil society stakeholder views on forensic DNA phenotyping: Balancing risks and benefitsPersuasive bodies: Testimonies of deep brain stimulation and Parkinson's on YouTubeReasoning "Uncharted Territory": Notions of Expertise Within Ethics Review Panels Assessing Research Use of Social Media
P50
Q36674341-B60B3732-73C0-40E5-83A5-65255016F602Q37253639-43458C68-8F66-4928-9E9B-3A2F880685D4Q37551549-8312FDB7-0B45-4CFF-A1B9-4BD383FC25F5Q38633533-55FC71A2-FD24-4C83-AC34-AC520F46B163Q42271226-3BFD3868-189E-4B41-B64E-2B2E24418E8CQ47113416-6B40A1EE-0190-4B21-B8B8-88DBBD08BC22Q47309224-2C36A181-44F2-44FF-90E1-A92A34F806C0Q47557139-D2AEA49E-A8CD-4637-82D9-6C48964BCB19Q47633296-80961583-00DE-4C13-9662-779C209FC0B0Q52678411-6D8AADE8-9956-4446-BDF5-547F556A53ABQ54742245-785C757F-41E9-4E73-BFC3-541C060A2EEBQ57988729-19D6D840-3EC0-4E6B-BFB9-7CCBA5A6167EQ58656966-AEC4F16E-D865-4260-8C94-8E1C952C83D2Q90004074-C43A4815-91EB-41C1-9553-3D88B83476EAQ90097759-FBB6D05A-8ACE-46A8-8326-7DED3F43D84BQ90837903-909B7DE6-3F84-4483-8D50-CA0B088820E2Q91886543-0AACA21C-6D26-4C68-ACC9-16081B6AA536
P50
description
researcher ORCID ID = 0000-0001-8111-2730
@en
wetenschapper
@nl
name
G Samuel
@ast
G Samuel
@en
G Samuel
@es
G Samuel
@nl
type
label
G Samuel
@ast
G Samuel
@en
G Samuel
@es
G Samuel
@nl
prefLabel
G Samuel
@ast
G Samuel
@en
G Samuel
@es
G Samuel
@nl
P108
P1153
7005273386
P31
P496
0000-0001-8111-2730