about
The democratic fallacy in matters of clinical opinion: implications for analysing cause-of-death dataBrazilian obstetrician-gynecologists and abortion: a survey of knowledge, opinions and practices.Essential elements of an early intervention service for psychosis: the opinions of expert cliniciansTowards a comprehensive structural coverage of completed genomes: a structural genomics viewpointReversing opinions on Dollo’s LawDefining life: the virus viewpointPublic Opinion at the Time of the Vote on Health Care ReformAmyloid fibrils from the viewpoint of protein foldingOptimising outcome in congenital hypothyroidism; current opinions on best practice in initial assessment and subsequent managementClassification of weevils as a data-driven science: leaving opinion behindInformation requirements related to new energy technologies: NIOSH viewpointViewpoint response to unresolved mysteriesSmall business owners' opinions about written health and safety information.Knowledge and opinions of designers of industrialized wall panels regarding incorporating ergonomics in designViewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviewsLocal opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesViewpoint: Randomised controlled trials using invasive control interventions should be included in Cochrane Reviews.Viewpoint: Randomised controlled trials using invasive ‘placebo’ controls are unethical and should be excluded from Cochrane ReviewsLocal opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesEmergence of Congenital Zika Syndrome: Viewpoint From the Front LinesAdvantages of excluding underpowered studies in meta-analysis: Inclusionist versus exclusionist viewpointsOpinion: Reproducible research can still be wrong: adopting a prevention approachScientists and the marketplace of opinions. Scientific credibility takes on a different meaning when reaching out to the publicAn online survey of chiropractors' opinions of Continuing Education.J M W Turner and some of his predecessors and successors, from the viewpoint of medical historySex and gender issues in competitive sports: investigation of a historical case leads to a new viewpointOlfactory receptor multigene family in vertebrates: from the viewpoint of evolutionary genomicsScreening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen testing: American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion.The effect of opinion clustering on disease outbreaksExorcism: a psychiatric viewpointThe anaesthetist's viewpoint on the treatment of respiratory complications in poliomyelitis during the epidemic in Copenhagen, 1952Apical dominance and shoot branching. Divergent opinions or divergent mechanisms?Opinion: predictive testing for Huntington disease in childhood: challenges and implicationsMalaria and helminth interactions in humans: an epidemiological viewpointViewpoints on the problems of chemicals in foods; the viewpoint of a food manufacturerThe standard of care debate: against the myth of an "international consensus opinion"The standard of care debate: the Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinionWhite coat ceremonies: a second opinionPublic opinion regarding earmarked cigarette tax in TaiwanDebate: A subversive view of subsets - a dissident clinician's opinion
P31
Q21093219-F8833985-5270-44B7-BC5D-748980208579Q21245039-897B8D6F-DEC3-4466-BC22-5D3AD069CF5DQ21260305-027D48FB-7A0D-4246-8295-96EA66402482Q21284214-49C5887C-4DDC-43C3-BA8F-9A983BD7D802Q22162493-35A2E60E-19DD-4A19-9A15-B7CE8A78A3FEQ22240835-46FED17E-A4F9-4F15-AF77-3481F5C72085Q22250869-9CB06547-E275-4EB8-BED2-A0F894FA0EF9Q22252804-79D2D7C2-148B-46FC-A40F-757F40ECEF60Q22305414-064F8C0B-9B31-4285-8026-828FF29F85F7Q22680770-EA8E6CE7-2906-4B65-B615-BD23C45BC769Q23910461-E91E6BBE-43D3-4F19-8A4E-6B4F90CA1A93Q23912770-3277B943-B8B4-4933-8428-87DCB7E3AC2DQ23917053-EC84980D-CA93-4664-957B-55D4795DBB40Q23921965-4743F048-00F6-4D46-87EE-8E20EF2BD43FQ24185986-52120D21-8C86-4471-9AC5-24FD6D2D55D0Q24234966-4C9E14C5-81BC-426B-95B4-CBC0A49B8E4EQ24235321-D0808374-46A0-4146-B2B0-349356F27344Q24236226-6E819C35-8C3D-445F-9B02-B7A0A006191EQ24243192-C09729F8-A387-46C9-8500-40EA8B476FC8Q24261097-62E9E8B4-1A98-4AE5-8A9F-5501DA459A48Q24273203-A37FB306-F857-48D1-B34D-830FBD113B9FQ24289255-5A510569-9715-4165-849B-A14837CA6D26Q24537206-7BE943CE-5F66-48A6-A6DC-75E764D225D5Q24537552-97A1E17E-3F18-4BCF-9D3E-F37C0945222AQ24542528-B3699AC9-7FCB-40FA-995E-3C0A1BBB7D84Q24604042-CF689697-9A3B-4417-A4B5-E0A3541F8B19Q24613863-DF49AA75-720B-44CC-A285-673EEB7FB5C9Q24620320-1B5E1A6A-2611-42A7-B55A-67C438D94194Q24641924-944457BC-3173-4A36-952D-905E37201268Q24649188-14DC233D-43FF-4242-AA48-5825CCDDB17FQ24672282-41FE26B8-4F23-48DC-97DC-8A2730DC248EQ24676260-2106B367-5E72-47AB-A133-34A11A8153F3Q24677475-8C133FFE-ECD2-4405-B6A2-5E70671C3254Q24677835-1F88B80B-056E-405E-9361-0EC43EF6B907Q24680157-DD99DCA9-CF99-4521-A585-E12679BDFC6BQ24682159-328C644D-1DB0-46ED-A84B-B909716D0D02Q24682219-D823FFCC-2FC5-49D7-90B1-1248598DF5D4Q24682404-1776CEA8-7378-4D57-8BD6-625DF4890077Q24791556-C112F190-C37D-4664-9870-F6F051428759Q24792396-8FCC9261-0E5F-4CEE-B734-2AEC9079E3C8
P31
description
Type of scholarly publications
@en
name
Opinion paper
@en
type
label
Opinion paper
@en
altLabel
Viewpoint
@en
prefLabel
Opinion paper
@en