The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations
about
Expert failure: re-evaluating research assessmentHundred top-cited articles focusing on acute kidney injury: a bibliometric analysisThe natural selection of bad scienceUsing publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impactAuto-correlation of journal impact factor for consensus research reporting statements: a cohort studyThe cock, the Academy, and the best scientific journal in the worldSharing Neuron Data: Carrots, Sticks, and Digital RecordsTen simple rules for a successful cross-disciplinary collaboration“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellenceA systematic review of rodent pest research in Afro-Malagasy small-holder farming systems: Are we asking the right questions?Assessing Individual Intellectual Output in Scientific Research: Mexico's National System for Evaluating Scholars Performance in the Humanities and the Behavioral Sciences.Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review.Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social mediaEvery scientist is a memory researcher: Suggestions for making research more memorable.Reviewing post-publication peer review.A Falsification of the Citation Impediment in the Taxonomic LiteratureScientific publications in nursing journals from Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: a 10-year survey of the literatureCauses for the persistence of impact factor maniaThe 100 most cited publications in cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size.Article-level assessment of influence and translation in biomedical research.Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda.New research journals are needed and can compete with titans.Editorial: a Very Special IssueThe interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research.Have research assessment exercises improved the quality of nursing research?
P2860
Q21563534-C550DDBF-CBF2-4621-A93C-1169374952A6Q26779625-EF9EC08A-99E1-46EE-9963-D1B36B8EFF4DQ27333717-61BC7FC9-E210-470B-8181-2B2DF981D2D1Q28597772-24B5D6EB-9DC7-4724-A96B-5474095B248AQ28601029-C9ADC5EC-E8BC-472D-90F7-93B39B28A64EQ28603786-AF901D0C-E826-44EC-A1F0-7C3921E4CA2CQ28606629-14D46699-DBBC-4B10-8DA0-E3E4B9821015Q28974680-DA0FB163-308E-497F-9250-4C87FDC59F3FQ29017249-E15C43FB-35EE-4134-B86A-E0028934FE34Q30359253-CF31C01B-8C2D-4FDD-A3DE-F785DFDD6D5AQ30388252-0EC150C2-9276-4BDC-9374-FF6AF979BCA6Q30487340-B8A4A092-77B3-4A52-907D-0FBF5711E766Q30504858-EE010E3B-E274-422E-A697-E996B6DADD16Q35173312-9CEB36D6-032C-44FC-85B2-197B97E42F54Q35756669-48EBCB06-83B6-4215-B664-BD6BD5AB9BE3Q35962065-87A9CB3F-60B3-4F83-B6E3-CCE3B05E647CQ36691331-00E9D4A5-54AE-408E-A285-770A0D34CDD0Q37667976-4E478C24-19C0-434D-B289-07974921F72FQ38248174-CDA32F64-5866-4436-8F29-40D8EC8880CCQ38661305-914113EE-84C0-4772-8FDB-5C68B82699A2Q38755573-3609DED6-52FF-4E66-85E9-09B1080DE950Q38765450-163A4B9A-0F54-46E9-8A0B-994C27A51458Q42371525-51109C8A-9678-4DDD-84B2-505E684FA543Q42755596-8C19A32B-2601-489D-9A1E-193F89731614Q47588615-3C4414AD-A80C-471B-9F45-BC31686C2AA6Q48144665-CBE02623-815B-41BC-BAD4-0A2FC38C2DD6
P2860
The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@ast
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@en
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@en-gb
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@nl
type
label
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@ast
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@en
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@en-gb
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@nl
prefLabel
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@ast
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@en
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@en-gb
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@nl
P2860
P921
P3181
P1433
P1476
The assessment of science: the ...... r, and the number of citations
@en
P2093
Nina Stoletzki
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1001675
P407
P577
2013-10-01T00:00:00Z