about
Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountabilityFrequency of discrepancies in retracted clinical trial reports versus unretracted reports: blinded case-control studyIncreasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research'Peer review' for scientific manuscripts: Emerging issues, potential threats, and possible remediesA comprehensive comparative analysis of articles retracted in 2012 and 2013 from the scholarly literatureThe natural selection of bad scienceThe Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research PublicationsWhat is open peer review? A systematic reviewSelf-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impactThe increasing urgency for standards in basic biologic research.Internet publicity of data problems in the bioscience literature correlates with enhanced corrective actionData fraud in clinical trials.A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewSources of error in the retracted scientific literatureMethodological Rigor in Preclinical Cardiovascular Studies: Targets to Enhance Reproducibility and Promote Research TranslationEditorial research and the publication process in biomedicine and health: Report from the Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, December 2012.A survey of retracted articles in dentistryFinancial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publicationsA comprehensive analysis of articles retracted between 2004 and 2013 from biomedical literature - a call for reforms.Estimating the prevalence of researcher misconduct: a study of UK academics within biological sciences.Overflow in science and its implications for trust.What studies of retractions tell usWhy growing retractions are (mostly) a good signDoes Exonerating an Accused Researcher Restore the Researcher's Credibility?Exploring the attitudes of medical faculty members and students in Pakistan towards plagiarism: a cross sectional survey.Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.Scientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective.Life Science's Average Publishable Unit (APU) Has Increased over the Past Two Decades.Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic reviewStrong Inference in Mathematical Modeling: A Method for Robust Science in the Twenty-First Century.Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies.Some Consequences of Refusing to Participate in Peer ReviewScientific publications - Unscientific demeanor: Where are the problems?Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions.Faculty promotions in medical institutions in India: Can we improve the criteria?Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed CentralDuplicate publication rate decline in Korean medical journals.Submitting a manuscript for peer review--integrity, integrity, integritySafeguarding the integrity of science communication by restraining 'rational cheating' in peer reviewConcern noted: A descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central.
P2860
Q24288992-E728DC63-BB3E-425B-BF35-E55D4ECB7587Q24289040-B5A802C2-8D7D-4F89-BD8E-9FC31A0E4F58Q24289253-F1858F93-CA73-4B34-8A7A-5144A111C7CDQ24497581-D02FBD1D-721C-4DAE-9AF8-E5A68D686D27Q27024924-F2A0CAC6-D201-4D05-A7F2-68B404AE35BAQ27333717-431D6789-9285-4CB0-A057-0D4729448527Q28596390-7BD149F3-20C9-42E3-AD99-F1E9A0711ED0Q29649956-683DC151-0E9E-4ED9-8762-1E7F51225F3CQ30486792-BC43A467-938A-4F2C-A89B-979067B14196Q30487147-DBBF89FA-D283-4488-BEBA-B7859A1F0E68Q30808769-762FAE87-392A-42E4-BC67-B5DDB6D38D1FQ30902176-47E97126-C222-4FCF-BFDD-471EB87E0172Q33269085-C55BAF59-62C1-4885-8824-9E3EDDA35E93Q33576182-E50048DC-4871-4F09-A094-C544C2D17907Q33782901-934DD0C0-BC17-4D49-9010-B6CCC125236FQ33852090-2233567D-CFA7-489A-B8C7-F65CD0775F68Q33882499-583E4EAA-7FD1-43EE-A120-6037A7D2EEE3Q34042935-7736B20C-9D87-433F-B2C9-28B0B8C1C697Q34080780-08C0B32F-2C14-43C5-8C2D-A76CD403E7B2Q34211450-42222C68-2F04-422E-A647-AAEF767B3244Q34493918-B92DC8D4-E9F6-40B1-A08D-00F94C7B5899Q34781955-FEB96FD9-8624-49D9-870A-ABEF0B1F468AQ35060121-01741D01-C98E-42FB-909E-BE5FDE992928Q35602976-766B276E-BED3-408A-8508-CACB2D18EE94Q35765028-4F70922A-5D5D-443D-91A3-971CD4FAFFAAQ35878581-CD3DCCFD-10A1-4CCD-87ED-62F42FE73A89Q35913615-77D55E97-A087-4A02-A7F4-4A5BA091D034Q36054494-31D2736D-2F58-4FB8-A88A-0A49338B1482Q36063705-E7432B7A-F45E-4A13-9DDF-50D52D202908Q36097151-96B08C5A-C44F-4868-BE1C-831805CC3E5BQ36248302-9149BD1D-12D4-42A3-ACF0-592920C77A65Q36844492-A1E64490-C71B-4441-BBAC-BFECD61CDA32Q36932196-7054F38F-B23A-4481-BB25-AFED5D0B4ED5Q37130633-5495A6DD-0D45-45AA-BAD6-D75BD7A92DF7Q37444868-27A2FBF3-9048-4B3A-8D41-D8BC4930F210Q37516805-B336E339-2093-407E-9C7C-31030383ECFCQ37583022-E03E334B-A7A8-4B1C-8C50-68F35A3A5650Q37588792-ECFFEA67-5F7C-47C5-9921-3EBCB4DB2683Q38269477-D2404D03-D55C-4AF6-B759-AD16CE10930CQ38372710-6D00F066-9B5D-4A43-AFBA-8D8D7E77E6DB
P2860
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@ast
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@en
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@en-gb
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@nl
type
label
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@ast
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@en
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@en-gb
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@nl
prefLabel
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@ast
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@en
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@en-gb
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@nl
P2860
P3181
P1433
P1476
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
@en
P2093
R Grant Steen
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0068397
P407
P577
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z